Urgensi Rancangan Undang-Undang Perampasan Aset dalam Optimalisasi Pengembalian Hasil Korupsi di Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v4i2.4773Keywords:
Asset confiscation, Asset confiscation’s bill, CorruptionAbstract
The development of corruption nowadays is accompanied by other crimes related to hide assets from corruption and one way of it is by money laundering mechanism. The mechanism of it is contained in the Criminal Code, Criminal Procedure Code, Law No. 20/2001 jo. Law No. 31/1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption and Law No. 8/2010 concerning Prevention and Eradication of the Crime of Money Laundering. There are also international legal instruments adopted to strengthen efforts to seize assets from criminal acts of corruption, such as UNCAC which was ratified by the Government of Indonesia into Law Number 7/2006 concerning Ratification of the UNCAC on April 18, 2006. Indonesia needs a regulation that has stronger legal force and has a special mechanism regarding the mechanism for the confiscation of assets and assets that are suspected of being obtained as a result of corruption. It can be suggested to the Government and the legislature to encourage the discussion and passing of the asset confiscation bill’s immediately.
Downloads
References
Bahder Johan Nasution. (2008). Metode penelitian ilmu hukum. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53.
Diaz, J. (2015). Federal forfeiture law: Provisions, issues and reform proposals. In Federal Forfeiture Law: Provisions, Issues and Reform Proposals.
Fauzia, A., & Hamdani, F. (2021). Legal development through the implementation of non-conviction based concepts in money laundering asset recovery practices in Indonesia. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Law and Human Rights 2021 (Vol. 592).
Fernando, Z. J., Pujiyono, P., Susetyo, H., Candra, S., & Putra, P. S. (2022). Preventing bribery in the private sector through legal reform based on Pancasila. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2138906
Greenberg, T. S., Samuel, L. M., Grant, W., & Gray, L. (2009). Stolen asset recovery: A good practices guide for non-conviction based asset forfeiture.
Hamzah, A. A. (2020). Tindak pidana korupsi, 1(31).
Hutapea, J. A. (2016). Perbuatan pungutan liar (pungli). Jurnal Nestor Magister Hukum, 1(1).
Ibrahim, J. (2006). Teori & metodologi penelitian hukum normatif. Teori Metodologi Penelitian A, 299.
Ifrani. (2018). Tindak pidana korupsi sebagai kejahatan luar biasa. Al-Adl: Jurnal Hukum, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v9i3.1047
Kuku, T. P. D. N., Warong, R. N., & Antow, D. T. (2020). Perampasan aset tanpa menjalani pemidanaan bagi pelaku yang melarikan diri atau meninggal dunia dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi. Lex Crimen, 9(4).
Kusnadi, K. (2020). Kebijakan formulasi ketentuan pengembalian aset hasil tindak pidana korupsi. Corruptio, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.25041/corruptio.v1i2.2097
Legislation. (2021). Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. Legislation, 8(6).
Lukito, A. S. (2020). Revealing the unexplained wealth in Indonesian corporation: A revolutionary pattern in non-conviction-based asset forfeiture. Journal of Financial Crime, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-11-2018-0116
Nugraha, S. P. (2020). Kebijakan perampasan aset hasil tindak pidana korupsi. National Conference for Law Studies.
Nugroho, K., & Hasan, F. N. (2023). Analisis sentimen masyarakat mengenai RUU perampasan aset di Twitter menggunakan metode Naïve Bayes. SMATIKA Jurnal, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.32664/smatika.v13i02.899
Nurbaningsih, E. (2015). Naskah akademik rancangan undang-undang tentang perampasan aset tindak pidana. Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional.
Peter, M. M. (2011). Penelitian hukum (Cet. ke-7). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Priyatno, D. (2018). Non conviction based (NCB) asset forfeiture for recovering the corruption proceeds in Indonesia. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 9(1), 215–223. https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v9.1(31).27
Putra, I. S. (2022). Tindak pidana korupsi ditinjau dari HAM di Indonesia. Jurnal Res Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.46306/rj.v2i1.27
Qodar, N. (2023). Pengembalian aset negara dari kasus korupsi dinilai belum maksimal.
Saputra, R. (2017). Tantangan penerapan perampasan aset tanpa tuntutan pidana (nonconviction based asset forfeiture) dalam RUU perampasan aset di Indonesia. Integritas: Jurnal Anti Korupsi, 3(1).
Syahban, Sibuea, H. P., & Saimima, I. D. S. (2021). Kedudukan kepala desa dalam tindak pidana korupsi menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Jo Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi. Jurnal Hukum Sasana, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.31599/sasana.v7i2.806
Tantimin, T. (2023). Penyitaan hasil korupsi melalui non-conviction based asset forfeiture sebagai upaya pengembalian kerugian negara. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 5(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v5i1.85-102
United Nations Convention against Corruption. (2019). In Global crime: An encyclopedia of cyber theft, weapons sales, and other illegal activities: Volume 1: AL: Volume 2: MZ (pp. 739–745). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802206494.00107
Wulandari, Suprayitno, W., Kurniawan, K. D., & Özkan Borsa, M. (2023). Asset forfeiture of corruption proceeds using the non-conviction based asset forfeiture method: A review of human rights. Indonesia Law Reform Journal, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v3i1.24496
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
