Pertanggung jawaban Pidana Korporasi dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia

Authors

  • Tiara Jelita Andalusianti Roozan Universitas Tidar Magelang
  • Rajwa Al Imtiyaz Universitas Tidar Magelang
  • Hasrinda Rizqi Pramassari Universitas Tidar Magelang
  • Muhammad Reyvanza Anwar Universitas Tidar Magelang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v4i2.4522

Keywords:

business integrity, corporate, corruption crime, criminal liability, anti corruption system Retry Claude can make mistakes

Abstract

This article analyzes the juridical construction, practical implementation, and problematics of corporate criminal liability in corruption cases in Indonesia. Employing a normative-juridical approach with analytical-evaluative dimensions, this research examines primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, as well as data from in-depth interviews with key informants. The results indicate that despite the legal framework accommodating the concept of corporations as subjects of criminal law in corruption cases, its implementation faces significant obstacles reflected in the minimal designation of corporations as suspects/defendants. These obstacles encompass substantive aspects related to unclear formulation of liability elements, procedural aspects concerning limitations in procedural law, institutional aspects regarding law enforcement capacity, and practical aspects related to sanctions execution. This research proposes a comprehensive and integrative model for strengthening corporate criminal liability through normative reformulation, procedural and institutional strengthening, and development of corporate compliance incentives, projected to contribute to improving the effectiveness of corporate corruption enforcement and strengthening business integrity systems in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alfianto, D. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi pada korupsi pengadaan barang/jasa pemerintah berdasarkan Perma RI No. 13 Tahun 2016. Hukum Pidana dan Pembangunan Hukum, 5(1), 25–40. https://www.e-journal.trisakti.ac.id/index.php/hpph/article/view/15874

Aslam, N. (2022). Pencegahan korupsi di sektor BUMN dalam perspektif pelayanan publik di Indonesia. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 7(2), 359–372. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v7i2.818

Faturachman, F. A., Hutasoit, T. J., & Hosnah, A. U. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban dan penegakan hukum pidana korporasi dalam tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia. AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis, 4(2), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.37481/jmh.v4i2.731

Indriawati, S. E., & Chiliandra, P. P. G. (2025). Pertanggungjawaban dan penegakan hukum pidana korporasi dalam tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia. Prosiding SENANTIAS: Seminar Nasional Hasil Penelitian dan PkM, 6(1), 1–13.

Istiqomah, S., Rokhim, A., & Isnaeni, D. (2023). Kebijakan hukum pidana dalam pertanggungjawaban korporasi yang melakukan tindak pidana korupsi. Al Daulah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Ketatanegaraan, 12(2), 278–297. https://doi.org/10.24252/ad.vi.43642

Jennings, A. K. (2023). The market for corporate criminals. Yale Journal on Regulation, 40(2), 520–568. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4195093

Lord, N. (2023). Prosecution deferred, prosecution exempt: On the interests of (in)justice in the non-trial resolution of transnational corporate bribery. British Journal of Criminology, 63(4), 848–866. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azac059

Mohd Ali, H., Md Said, M. H., & Binti Che Man, S. Z. (2023). Corporate culture as a means of proving mens rea in corporate criminal liability under Malaysian anti-corruption law. Jurnal Undang-Undang dan Masyarakat, 33, 119–132. https://doi.org/10.17576/juum-2023-33-10

Olodaiv, A., Siagian, D. B., Sahari, A., & Nadirah, I. (2022). Juridical analysis of legal sanctions for criminal acts of corruption conducted together (Study of Supreme Court Decision Number 1054 K/Pid.Sus/2019). International Journal Reglement & Society (IJRS), 3(3), 257–266. http://jurnal.bundamediagrup.co.id/index.php/ijrs

Oteo, O. V., García-Torea, N., & de la Cuesta-González, M. (2025). Corporate corruption management: A proposal for an accountability framework. Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, 28(1), 96–114. https://doi.org/10.6018/rcsar.543701

Putra, N. R., & Linda, R. (2022). Impact of social change on society from the crime of corruption. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 8(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v8i1.898

Rodliyah, R., Suryani, A., & Husni, L. (2021). Konsep pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi (corporate crime) dalam sistem hukum pidana Indonesia. Journal Kompilasi Hukum, 5(1), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.29303/jkh.v5i1.43

Romdoni, M. (2022). A literature review of coercive isomorphism on corporate legal responsibility in Indonesia. Pranata Hukum, 17(2), 121.

Sari, N. K. A. (2023). Criminal liability for corporate crime in Indonesia. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 5(1), 867–874. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i1.2687

Setyowati, S. (2023). Application of the business judgment rule doctrine in corporate criminal liability in corruption crimes by state-owned enterprises. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (JHSS), 7(2), 529–536. https://journal.unpak.ac.id/index.php/jhss/article/view/8641

Downloads

Published

2025-06-09

How to Cite

Tiara Jelita Andalusianti Roozan, Rajwa Al Imtiyaz, Hasrinda Rizqi Pramassari, & Muhammad Reyvanza Anwar. (2025). Pertanggung jawaban Pidana Korporasi dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Humaniora, 4(2), 866–876. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v4i2.4522

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.