Paradoks Pidana Denda dan Kurungan Pengganti dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi

Authors

  • Petrus Meirio Mamoh Faculty Of Law, Nusa Cendana University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v4i3.5820

Keywords:

Legal Effectiveness, Corruption, Substitute Imprisonment, Criminal Fine

Abstract

Corruption in Indonesia is a serious and systemic issue. One of the legal approaches used to address this problem is the imposition of criminal fines. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of fines imposed on corruption offenders. The research employs a normative approach with a juridical-qualitative method, based on literature studies of relevant laws and court decisions. The findings indicate that although criminal fines are regulated under Law No. 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law No. 20 of 2001, their implementation has not been effective. Fines can still be replaced with substitute imprisonment of up to eight months under the Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP), which is often preferred by convicted individuals. In addition, there is no clear system regarding the proportional amount of fines, deadlines for payment, or enforcement mechanisms. The lack of strict regulations concerning remission also weakens the deterrent effect. This study concludes that the regulation and enforcement of criminal fines in corruption cases have not yet provided optimal deterrence and still leave many legal loopholes that need to be addressed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Korupsi dan pemerintahan yang bersih. Konstitusi Press.

Buku

Farid, A. Z. (2006). Bentuk-bentuk khusus perwujudan delik (percobaan, penyertaan, dan gabungan delik) dan hukum penitensier. Rajagrafindo.

Hamzah, A. (1991). Perkembangan hukum pidana khusus. Rineka Cipta.

Hiariej, E. O. S. (2014). Prinsip-prinsip hukum pidana. Cahaya Atma Pustaka.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP).

Kompas.com. (2024, Mei 19). ICW catat 731 kasus korupsi pada 2023, jumlahnya meningkat signifikan. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2024/05/19/17020321/icw-catat-731-kasus-korupsi-pada-2023-jumlahnya-meningkat-siginifikan

Kusumaatmadja, M. (2003). Pengantar hukum internasional. Binacipta.

Mamudji, S. (2001). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian hukum. Kencana.

Moeljatno. (2002). Asas-asas hukum pidana. Rineka Cipta.

Pengadilan Negeri Kupang. (2023, Maret 14). Putusan Nomor 39/Pid.Sus-TPK/2023/PN Kpg dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi atas nama terdakwa Anselmus Anias, S.E.

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Putusan Pengadilan

Soekanto, S. (2001). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Sudarto. (1986). Hukum dan hukum pidana. Alumni.

Sumber Internet

Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-26

How to Cite

Mamoh, P. M. (2025). Paradoks Pidana Denda dan Kurungan Pengganti dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Humaniora, 4(3), 370–383. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v4i3.5820

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.