Perspektif Hakim terhadap Penerapan Hukum Adat dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana di Pengadilan Negeri Padangsidimpuan

Authors

  • Marwan Busyro Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan
  • Bandaharo Saifuddin Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v5i2.7238

Keywords:

Criminal, Customs, Judge, Law, Padangsidimpuan District Court

Abstract

The background of this research aims to determine and analyze judges' perspectives on the application of customary law in resolving criminal cases at the Padangsidimpuan District Court. Customary law is an unwritten legal system that exists and develops within society and is often used as a consideration in deciding cases related to local values ​​and cultural wisdom. In the context of Padangsidimpuan society, which still strongly upholds customs and traditions, customary law often serves as a means of resolving social conflicts before they enter the formal legal realm. The research method used is empirical juridical, with data collection techniques through direct interviews with judges and document studies of several relevant court decisions. The results indicate that most judges at the Padangsidimpuan District Court view customary law as a complementary instrument to positive law, particularly in minor criminal cases with social and familial dimensions. Judges strive to consider customary values ​​to achieve substantive justice, without neglecting the principle of legality and statutory provisions. However, the application of customary law cannot replace positive law in its entirety; rather, it serves as a moral and social value that strengthens the community's sense of justice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arief, B. N. (2010a). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Arief, B. N. (2010b). Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana. FH UNDIP Press.

Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian. Rineka Cipta.

Arnheim, R. (1974). Art and Visual Perception: A Psychology of the Creative Eye. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520351271

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality. Doubleday.

Edwards, B. (1986). Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain. TarcherPerigee.

Hall, J. (2011). History of Western Art. Thames & Hudson.

Hamzah, A. (2008). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia (Edisi Revisi). Sinar Grafika.

Harahap, Y. (2002). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP. Sinar Grafika.

Ibrahim, J. (2006). Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Bayumedia Publishing.

Kemp, M. (1990). The Science of Art: Optical Themes in Western Art from Brunelleschi to Seurat. Yale University Press.

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2016). Pedoman Penerapan Hukum Adat dalam Peradilan. Mahkamah Agung.

Marzuki, P. M. (2010). Pengantar Hukum Indonesia. Prenada Media.

Mertokusumo, S. (2006). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Liberty.

Muladi, & Arief, B. N. (1992). Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana. Alumni.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-04

How to Cite

Marwan Busyro, & Bandaharo Saifuddin. (2026). Perspektif Hakim terhadap Penerapan Hukum Adat dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana di Pengadilan Negeri Padangsidimpuan. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Humaniora, 5(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v5i2.7238

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.