Perbandingan Ratio Decidendi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tentang Presidensial Threshold di Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v4i1.5032Keywords:
Ratio Deciendi, Decision, Constitutional Court, Legal ImplicationsAbstract
The Constitutional Court (MK) regarding the Election Law on the presidential and vice presidential nomination threshold. Since the presidential election was held directly, the issue of the threshold for nominating presidential and vice presidential candidates has always surfaced every time a presidential election is held. In 2004, for example, the presidential nomination threshold was 10 percent. This research is a juridical-normative research, namely a process to find legal rules, legal principles, and legal doctrines in order to answer the legal issues faced. The data was analyzed descriptively-qualitatively.The results of this study indicate that the Constitutional Court Decision Number 74/PUU-XVII/2020 concerning the presidential nomination threshold (Presidential Threshold) is one of the important decisions in the discourse of democracy in Indonesia. The following is an explanation of the Ratio Decidendi of the decision in relation to the concept of democracy: Constitutionality of the Presidential Threshold The Constitutional Court (MK) in its decision emphasized that the presidential threshold or presidential nomination threshold is constitutional. This means that the provisions regarding the threshold do not conflict with the 1945 Constitution. The Constitutional Court is of the opinion that the presidential threshold is an open legal policy (Open Legal Policy) which is the authority of the lawmakers, namely the House of Representatives (DPR) and the President. The purpose of the Presidential Threshold, the Constitutional Court explained that the purpose of the presidential threshold is to simplify the party system and the presidential system, as well as to create government stability. The Ratio Decidendi of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 74/Puu-XXII/2024, Number 87/Puu-XXII/2024, Number 129/Puu-XXI/2023, Number 131/Puu-XXI 2023 concerning the Presidential Nomination Threshold is the Presidential Threshold is constitutional and does not conflict with the principles of democracy.
Downloads
References
Andi Saputra, “Ahli KhawatirkanPresidential threshold Ciptakan Kebijakan yang Otorite”, diakses melalui https://www.google.com/amp/s/news.detik.com/berita/d-5886704/ahli-khawatirkan-presidential-threshold-tiptakan-kebijakanyangotoriter/amp, di akses pada tanggal 27 April 2024. Jurnal Rechten: Riset Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 1 Vol. 2 | No . 3 | 2020, Permasalahan Mengenai Pemilihan Umum Tentang Efektivitas Ambang Batas Presiden M. Daffa Alfaritsi, Yoga Mulyadi
Dody Nur Adriyan, Hukum Tata Negara Dan Sistem Politik, Sleman: Deepublish, 2018, hlm. 39.
Eddy Purnama, Negara kedaulatan Rakyat, (Nusamedia : Bandung, 2007), hlm-27.
Ediwarman. Monograf. Metode Penelitian Hukum (Panduan Penulisan Tesis dan Disertasi), Medan, 2011, halaman 94
Ediwarman. Monograf. Op. Cip. Hal. 94.
Gibran Maulana Ibrahim, "Tolak Presidential Threshold, Demokrat: Membatasi Capres Alternatif", diakses melalui https://news.detik.com/berita/d-3567236/tolakpresidentialthreshold-demokrat-membatasi-capres-alternatif, di akses pada tanggal 27 April 2024.
https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2022/05/16/18030061/pengertian-presidential-threshold-dan-alasan-penerapannya?page=all, di akses pada tanggal 27 April 2024.
Jhony Ibrahim. Teori dan Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2006, halaman 295.
Moh. Mahfud MD, Politk Hukum Di Indonesia, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2014, hlm. 41.
_________Ibid.
Ni’matul Huda, Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia, Depok: Rajawali Press, 2018, hlm. 154.
Pasal 222 Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 74/PUU-XVII/2020, hlm. 47.
Radita Ajie, “Batasan Pilihan Kebijakan Pembentuk Undang-Undang (Open Legal Policy) Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Berdasarkan Tafsir Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi,” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, vol. 13, no. 2 (2016): hlm. 112.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi. Lembaran Negara. 2003/ Nomor. 98, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Nomor. 4316, LL Setneg : 31 Hlm.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2017 Nomor 182, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 6109.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
