Eksistensi Kedaulatan Kreditor Konkuren dalam Perdamaian melalui PKPU yang Berkeadilan
(Studi Putusan: Nomor 751 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2024)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v4i3.5819Keywords:
PKPU, Debt Reschedule, Equality, Concurrent CreditorsAbstract
Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) is a legal mechanism that provides an opportunity for creditors and debtors to submit a debt reschedule plan to avoid bankruptcy. In the PKPU process, creditors have a role in determining the success of the agreement. In this case, concurrent creditors are more advantaged, because their position can be equal to that of separatist creditors who have collateral. This study examines how the existence of concurrent creditor sovereignty in the agreement process through PKPU, and to what extent the regulations regarding concurrent creditors and their rights are benefited in the cassation decision, especially in the Supreme Court Decision Number 751 K /Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2024. This research is a normative legal research, with prescriptive legal approach and conceptual approach. The types of data used include primary and secondary legal materials, which are collected through literature studies. The legal material analysis technique uses the syllogism and interpretation methods. The results of the analysis, this study identifies how the protection of concurrent creditor sovereignty in peace through PKPU. And how the Supreme Court Decision in Decision No. 751 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2024 pays more attention to concurrent creditors. In this discussion, shows how the regulations and legal protection of concurrent creditors, while discussing the Supreme Court Decision No. 751 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2024 which gave rise to polemics in the interpretation of the provisions of Article 281 paragraph 1. However, it is likely to reflect the judiciary in considering all creditors and debtors, to achieve equal justice for all parties.
Downloads
References
Annurriyyah, A., Dahlia, A., & Cahya, S. D. (2023). Pandangan Aliran Sociological Jurisprudence Terhadap Perluasan Asas Legalitas Materil Dalam KUHP Nasional. Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum dan Masyarakat, 2(01), 1–25.
Anwar, I. G., Mubarak, H. H., Suryanti, N., & Yuanitasari, D. (2023). Perjanjian Perdamaian Sebagai Langkah Restrukturisasi Hutang Dalam PKPU. Journal Of Comprehensive Science, 2(6), 1824–1845.
Anzward, B., Darwin, & Wulan, S. E. R. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kreditor Konkuren (Tanpa Jaminan) Dalam Perkara Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU) Pt. Asmin Koalindo Tuhup. Jurnal De Facto, 5(2), 144–161.
Atmadja, I. D. G., & Budiartha, I. N. P. (2018). Teori-Teori Hukum. Setara Press.
Azizah, N. (2022). Hukum Kepailitan: Memahami Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan. Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al-Banjari Banjarmasin.
Ginting, E. R. (2018). Hukum Kepailitan: Rapat-Rapat Kreditor. Sinar Grafika.
Hidayat, A. P. A., & Afriana, A. (2021). Penundaan Pengesahan Perdamaian Dalam Penundaan Kewajiban Pemabayaran Utang Oleh Hakim Dikaitkan Dengan Asas Kepastian Hukum. Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran, 3(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.23920/jphp.v3i1.564
Idham, I., Nawi, S., & Baharuddin, H. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Kreditor Konkuren Dalam Kepailitan: Studi Putusan Nomor. 04/Pdt.Sus-Pkpu.Pailit/2018/Pn.Niaga Mks. Journal of Lex Generalis (JLG), 1(5), 745–758.
Ihsan, M., & Widyaningrum, T. (2023). Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Tentang Terbukanya Upaya Hukum Kasasi Atas Putusan PKPU. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 8(2), 324-342.
Isharyanto. (2016). Teori Hukum: Suatu Pengantar dengan Pendekatan Tematik. Penerbit WR.
Mantili, R., & Dewi, P. E. T. (2020). Perlindungan Kreditor Konkuren Dalam Hukum Kepailitan. Jurnal Akses, 12(2), 97–108.
Mardani. (2024). Teori Hukum: Dari Teori Hukum Klasik Hingga Teori Hukum Kontemporer. KENCANA.
Nurfadilah, Rachmadi, A. F., Shahab, A., & Natsir, M. (2024). Aliran Hukum Sociological Jurisprudence dalam Perspektif Filsafat Hukum. Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan, 18(6), 4280–4290.
Rato, D., Setyawan, F., & Yahya, K. R. (2023). Aliran Hukum Sociological Jurisprudence Dalam Perseptif Filsafat Hukum. Jurnal Insan Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora, 1(1), 45–60.
Rusli, T. (2019). Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia. Universitas Bandar Lampung (UBL) Press.
Siagaian, M. T., & Faisal, F. (2023). Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU). UNPAM PRESS.
Sriwidodo, J., & Tumanggor. (2024). Perkembangan Hukum Kepailitan dan PPKPU di Indonesia. Kepel Press.
Syamsuddin, S., Hafidz, M., & Baharuddin, H. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Pihak Ketiga Terhadap Jaminan Kebendaan Dalam Harta Pailit. Journal of Lex Generalis (JLS), 2(3), 1368–1379.
Yitawati, K., Pujiyono, & Sulistyono, A. (2022). Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU). Deepublish Digital.
Yuhelson. (2023). Kepastian Hukum Perdamaian Dalam Kepailitan. ZAHIR PUBLISHING.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
