Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Mekanisme Kepailitan sebagai Solusi Penyelesaian Utang-Piutang di Indonesia

Authors

  • Kelfin Eka Putra Banu Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira Kupang
  • Richardus Wesly Teka Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira Kupang
  • Claudio Xaverius Oematan Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira Kupang
  • Alexadros Mone Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira Kupang
  • Fransiska Owa Da Santo Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira Kupang
  • Filemon Fridolino Ngebos Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira Kupang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v4i3.6063

Keywords:

Bankruptcy, Civil Law, Commercial Court, Debt-Receivables, Dispute Resolution

Abstract

Debt-receivable problems are classic problems in economic activities that if not resolved properly can result in legal uncertainty and losses to the parties involved. One of the legal instruments provided in the Indonesian legal system to resolve these disputes is through the bankruptcy mechanism. This study aims to review the legal provisions regarding bankruptcy as regulated in Law Number 37 of 2004 and evaluate the effectiveness of its implementation as a solution to resolving debt-receivable problems. The method used in this study is the normative legal approach, by reviewing statutory provisions, legal doctrine, and court decisions. The results of the study indicate that although normatively the bankruptcy mechanism has a clear legal structure, its implementation in the field still faces obstacles in terms of process efficiency, protection of creditor and debtor rights, and supervision of curators. Therefore, policy updates and optimization of the function of judicial institutions are needed to increase public trust in this mechanism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Hukumonline.com. (n.d.). Artikel dan jurnal terkait perkembangan hukum kepailitan di Indonesia. Diakses dari https://www.hukumonline.com

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (n.d.). Yurisprudensi kepailitan. Diakses dari https://www.mahkamahagung.go.id

Mulyadi, L. (2010). Hukum acara kepailitan. Jakarta: Djambatan.

Munir Fuady. (2011). Hukum pailit dalam teori dan praktik. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Pengadilan Niaga Jakarta Pusat. (2018). Putusan No. 48/Pailit/2018/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst.

R. Soebekti & R. Tjitrosudibio. (2002). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.

Rachmadi Usman. (2013). Hukum kepailitan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Salim, H. S. (2014). Hukum kepailitan: Perspektif global dan nasional. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Sembiring, S. (2015). Hukum kepailitan dan PKPU di Indonesia. Medan: Pustaka Bangsa Press.

Subekti. (2008). Pokok-pokok hukum perdata. Jakarta: Intermasa.

Subekti. (2009). Pokok-pokok hukum perdata. Jakarta: Intermasa.

Sudikno Mertokusumo. (2009). Hukum acara perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.

Yahya Harahap. (2010). Hukum kepailitan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Yahya Harahap. (2016). Hukum kepailitan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-04

How to Cite

Kelfin Eka Putra Banu, Richardus Wesly Teka, Claudio Xaverius Oematan, Alexadros Mone, Fransiska Owa Da Santo, & Filemon Fridolino Ngebos. (2025). Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Mekanisme Kepailitan sebagai Solusi Penyelesaian Utang-Piutang di Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Humaniora, 4(3), 886–895. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v4i3.6063

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.