Korelasi Asas Equality Before the Law dengan Affirmative Action dalam UU No. 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum: Studi Kritis atas Kuota 30% Keterwakilan Perempuan

Authors

  • Muh Akbar Yanlua Universitas Pattimura
  • Mohammad Sarfan Basyir Putuhena Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ambon
  • Syah Awaluddin Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ambon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v4i4.6537

Keywords:

Affirmative Action, Election Law, Equality Before the Law, Substantive Justice, Women's Quota

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the correlation between the principle of equality before the law and the affirmative action policy, which is expressed in the form of a 30% quota for women's representation in the political field, as stipulated in Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections. The focus of the study is directed at the extent to which this quota policy is in line with the principle of equality before the law and reflects substantive justice in democratic practices in Indonesia. The research method used is normative research by examining laws and regulations, legal doctrine, and relevant literature. This approach is used to assess whether the quota policy for women's representation is in accordance with the constitutional principle of equality, while also considering the challenges of its implementation in a socio-political context that is still gender biased. The results of the study indicate that the 30% quota for women in legislative candidacy is a form of positive discrimination intended to correct structural and historical inequalities in women's political participation. This policy is expected to open wider spaces for participation so that women have equal opportunities to play a role in the legislative process and public policy making. However, this policy has also drawn criticism. Some believe that the quota emphasizes fulfilling numbers rather than the quality and capacity of the individuals nominated. Therefore, the quota must be accompanied by efforts to improve the quality of women's human resources, political education, and transparent, merit-based selection mechanisms. This way, women's representation will not only be formal but also substantial and contribute significantly to democratic development. In conclusion, the 30% quota policy remains necessary as an affirmative step toward de facto equality. However, strengthening capacity and supporting systems is crucial for its implementation to align with the principle of equality before the law and achieve substantive justice.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anugrah, A. (2009). Keterwakilan perempuan dalam politik. Jakarta: Pancuran Alam.

Arafat, Y. (2010). Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia 1945 dan perubahannya. Jakarta: Permata Press.

Bacchi, C. L. (1996). The politics of affirmative action: Women, equality and category politics. London: Sage Publications.

Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW). (1979). United Nations General Assembly Resolution 34/180. United Nations. https://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/

Dahlerup, D. (2005). Increasing women’s political participation: New trends in gender quotas. Dalam J. Ballington & A. Karam (Eds.), Women in parliament: Beyond numbers (hlm. 141–152). Stockholm: International IDEA.

Dewi, H. (2016). Perempuan dan politik dalam perspektif kesetaraan gender. [Artikel]. Diakses 21 Desember 2020.

Fadli, A. N. (2016). Kejahatan HAM: Perspektif hukum pidana nasional dan hukum internasional. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.

Kania, D. (2015). Hak asasi perempuan dalam peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 12(4), 717–738. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1243

Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Penelitian hukum (cet. revisi). Jakarta: Kencana.

Masudi, M. F. (2006). Syarah Konstitusi UUD 1945. Jakarta: … [lengkapi penerbit].

Norris, P. (2009). Affirmative action dan paradoks demokrasi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 2(1), 10–23.

Republik Indonesia. (1984). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 1984 tentang Pengesahan Konvensi Mengenai Penghapusan Segala Bentuk Diskriminasi terhadap Wanita. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1984 Nomor 29.

Sayuti, H. (2013). Hakikat affirmative action dalam hukum Indonesia. Menara, 12(1), 41–56.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. (2002). Amandemen keempat Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Sekretariat Jenderal MPR RI.

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2016 tentang Penyandang Disabilitas.

Yanlua, M. A. (2021). Analisis legal feminis terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang pemilihan umum (Tesis, Universitas Pattimura Ambon).

Yanlua, M. A. (2021). Analisis legal feminis terhadap UU Pemilu Tahun 2017 (Tesis, Universitas Pattimura Ambon).

Downloads

Published

2025-08-16

How to Cite

Muh Akbar Yanlua, Mohammad Sarfan Basyir Putuhena, & Syah Awaluddin. (2025). Korelasi Asas Equality Before the Law dengan Affirmative Action dalam UU No. 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum: Studi Kritis atas Kuota 30% Keterwakilan Perempuan. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Humaniora, 4(4), 451–463. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v4i4.6537

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.