RUU KUHAP: Tantangan dan Harmonisasi antara Asas Due Process of Law dan Criminal Justice System di Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v3i2.6023Keywords:
criminal justice system, criminalization, due process of law, Islamic law, Pancasila law, RUU KUHAP, substantive justiceAbstract
The renewal of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) through the Draft Law (RUU) KUHAP opens up space for in-depth philosophical reflection on the relationship between law, justice, and humanity. This article examines the challenges of harmonizing the principle of due process of law, which emphasizes respect for individual rights in every legal process, with the criminal justice system, which is oriented towards efficiency and the purpose of punishment. This harmony is not only a technical and normative matter, but also a matter of shared understanding of what is meant by justice in the context of a more humane and human rights-based criminal justice system. Using a philosophical legal perspective, this article explores the potential for conflict and convergence between the two principles, and seeks common ground within the framework of Pancasila legal values and Islamic law that prioritize humanity, substantive justice, and a balance between individual rights and the public interest. The renewal of the RUU KUHAP, in this context, is not merely a structural change, but a journey towards a legal system that guarantees the depth of justice, which is not only seen from a procedural perspective, but also from the moral and social essence of the law itself.
Downloads
References
Barda Nawawi Arief, Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana (Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2007.
Daniel E. Hall, Criminal Law and Procedure. Boston: Cengage Learning, 2014.
Erwin Chemerinsky, Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies, 5th ed. New York: Wolters Kluwer, 2015.
Erwin Chemerinsky, Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies, 5th ed. (New York: Wolters Kluwer, 2015.
Geofani Milthree Saragih at all, Evaluasi Penerapan Nilai-Nilai Pancasila dan Penegakan Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Sistem Peradilan Indonesia melalui Pendekatan Konstitusiona. Jurnal reformasi Hukum, Vol.28 No.3 December 2024.
George F. Cole and Christopher E. Smith, The American System of Criminal Justice, 13th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning, 2011.
H.R. Manan, Teori dan Praktek Hukum Acara Pidana di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2018.
Immanuel Kant, Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Jasser Auda, Maqasid al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach. London: International Institute of Islamic Thought, 2008.
Jimly Asshiddiqie, Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia (Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2005.
Lembaga Kajian dan Advokasi untuk Independensi Peradilan (LeIP), Naskah Akademik RUU KUHAP: Tinjauan Kritis dan Rekomendasi, (Jakarta: LeIP, 2022.
M. Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2006.
Marwan Effendy, Reformasi Hukum Pidana dan KUHAP Baru (Jakarta: Referensi, 2015.
Marzuki, Asas-asas Hukum Acara Pidana. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016.
Muhammad Fadlillah, Hukum Acara Pidana di Indonesia. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2020.
Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, Pasal 28D ayat (1).
Roscoe Pound, An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1922.
Satjipto Rahardjo, Hukum Progresif: Hukum yang Membebaskan. Jakarta: Kompas, 2009.
Soerjono Soekanto, Sosiologi Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2010.
Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak, Pasal 6 dan Pasal 7.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
