Kepastian Hukum Penerapan Asas Audi et Alteram Partem dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Perdata Secara Elektronik (E-Court)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v5i2.8534Keywords:
Audi et Alteram Partem, Civil Procedure, E-Court, Electronic Judiciary, Legal CertaintyAbstract
The digital transformation of Indonesia’s judicial system through the implementation of e-court represents a judicial reform aimed at achieving a simple, fast, and low-cost legal process. However, the digitization of civil case proceedings raises concerns regarding legal certainty, particularly in the application of the principle of audi et alteram partem as a fundamental doctrine ensuring equal opportunity for parties to be heard. This study aims to analyze the normative regulation of the audi et alteram partem principle in Indonesian civil procedural law, examine its implementation within the e-court system, and assess whether its application provides adequate legal certainty for litigants. The research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches. Legal materials consist of statutory regulations, legal doctrines, and relevant academic journals. The findings indicate that normatively, the e-court system accommodates the right to be heard through electronic case registration, summons, hearings, and submission of documents. Nevertheless, technical obstacles, disparities in digital literacy, and potential deficiencies in electronic notification mechanisms may affect the effective protection of parties’ rights. It is concluded that the implementation of the audi et alteram partem principle in e-court has a sufficient legal foundation, yet requires further technical and regulatory strengthening to ensure optimal legal certainty.
Downloads
References
Adnyakausalya, N. M. A., Jocylina, M., Sirait, G., Putra, I. N. T. E., Saputra, K. A. A., Jaya, I. K. A. A., Putra, K. R. A., & Primantari, A. A. A. (2025). Analisis yuridis terhadap pelaksanaan persidangan elektronik perkara perdata dalam menjamin hak para pihak. Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA), 3(7). https://doi.org/10.62281
Astana, I. G. A. A. E. P., & Darmadi, A. A. N. O. Y. (2025). Urgensi penerapan asas due process of law dalam pemeriksaan saksi sebelum penetapan tersangka. Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA), 3(11). https://doi.org/10.62281
Fachreza Harla, M. C., & Hasmawati. (2024). Penerapan aplikasi e-court dalam persidangan perkara perdata sebagai wujud peradilan yang sederhana, cepat dan biaya ringan. Jurnal Tociung: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.64078/tociung.v4i2.2869
Handayani, D. (2024). Implikasi hukum penerapan asas keseimbangan pihak-pihak dalam persidangan perkara perdata. UNES Review, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i3
Hazarina Karmila, R., & Sumriyah. (2025). Transformasi digital dalam prosedur banding secara elektronik (e-court) dalam hukum acara perdata. Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA), 3(12). https://doi.org/10.62281
Khatimah, H. (2024). E-judiciary: Keabsahan pemeriksaan saksi virtual dalam sistem peradilan modern. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.62976/ijijel.v2i4.810
Khatimah, H. (2024). E-judiciary: Keabsahan pemeriksaan saksi virtual dalam sistem peradilan modern. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory.
Kusumahpraja, R. K., Aldabena, M. R., & Utami, F. R. (2025). Perubahan ketentuan persetujuan tergugat dalam e-court: Progresif atau regresif? Jurnal Litigasi Amsir, 104–111.
Leltakaeb, B. M., Asa, S., & Resopijani, A. (2026). Implementasi proses peradilan melalui e-court dalam penyelesaian perkara perdata di Pengadilan Negeri Kefamenanu Kelas II. AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis, 6(1), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.37481/jmh.v6i1.1826
Mokoagow, A. E., Asni, & Khalik, S. (2026). Efektivitas penerapan e-court dalam transparansi perkara pada Pengadilan Agama di Sulawesi Selatan. Inovasi: Jurnal Sosial Humaniora dan Pendidikan, 5(1), 455–470. https://doi.org/10.55606/inovasi.v5i1.5107
Pratama, M. N. F., & Wiraguna, S. A. (2026). Reformasi mekanisme pemanggilan para pihak dalam proses perdata: Menuju efisiensi berbasis teknologi informasi. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v4i1.408742
Pulumoduyo, N. F. (2025). Menakar konsistensi asas audi et alteram partem dalam putusan verstek perdata elektronik: Tantangan dan solusi hukum progresif. Judge: Jurnal Hukum, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.54209/judge.v6i03.1571
Pulumoduyo, N. F. (2025). Menakar konsistensi asas audi et alteram partem dalam putusan verstek perdata elektronik: Tantangan dan solusi hukum progresif. Judge: Jurnal Hukum, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.54209/judge.v6i03.1571
Santoso, A. P., & Wiraguna, S. A. (2025). Perlindungan hak pihak ketiga dalam perkara perdata elektronik: Analisis terhadap potensi abuse of process. Media Hukum Indonesia, 4(1), 355–364. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17865494
Sutrisno, A. (2025). Peran hakim dalam mewujudkan due process of law pada sistem peradilan tata usaha negara di Indonesia. Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.56128/jkih.v5i1.434
Tsabitha, A., Rahmadhani, A., Pebrianti, K. R., & Zakaria, S. A. (2024). Analisis penerapan e-court dalam sistem peradilan perdata di Indonesia guna mewujudkan peradilan yang transparan. Media Hukum Indonesia, 2(4), 757–763.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
