Implementasi Pasal 480 KUHP terhadap Peran Pembeli Barang Hasil Kejahatan Sebuah Tinjauan dari Praktik Persidangan

Authors

  • Ulfa Fatimah Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Alex Prayoga Sidabutar Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Jihan Aisyah Ramahdania Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Dorlince O Hutapea Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Parlaungan G Siahaan Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Dewi Pika Lbn Batu Universitas Negeri Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v5i1.7073

Keywords:

Article 480, Elements of Error, Enforcement Actions, Judicial Practice, Legal Certainty

Abstract

The crime of receiving stolen goods, as regulated in Article 480 of the Criminal Code (KUHP), is an offence that plays a crucial role in the continuation of the principal crime, particularly theft. Receivers provide a market for stolen goods, thereby indirectly encouraging perpetrators to continue their actions. This paper investigates how Article 480 of the KUHP in judicial practice, with a focus on proving the element of ‘knowing or reasonably suspecting’ that the goods purchased were obtained through criminal activity. This study uses a qualitative method with a case study approach through direct observation of a trial at the M. District Court. The observations show that the panel of judges successfully proved the defendant's guilt as a fence through a series of trial facts, such as the unreasonable purchase price, consistent testimony from the perpetrator of the theft, and the defendant's own admission that he had been suspicious. The judge's decision, which was lighter than the prosecutor's demands, also reflected considerations of substantive justice and humanity in addition to legal certainty. This study concludes that the effective enforcement of Article 480 of the Criminal Code in court plays an important role in breaking the chain of crime and providing a deterrent effect not only for the main perpetrators but also for those who participate in enjoying the proceeds of crime.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chandra, T. Y. (2022). Hukum Pidana. PT. Sangir Multi Usaha Dicetak.

Hakim, L. (2019). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Deepublish.

Hamdiyah, H. (2024). Analisis Unsur-Unsur Tindak Pidana Pencurian: Tinjauan Hukum. Jurnal Tahqiqa : Jurnal Ilmiah Pemikiran Hukum Islam, 18(1), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.61393/tahqiqa.v18i1.216

Hariyanto, Pratiwi, S., & Mardani. (2024). Urgensi Pemidanaan Pada Pelaku Kejahatan Pencurian dengan Pemberatan yang Dilakukan Secara Bersama-Sama. Journal Of Social Science Research, 4(3), 8690–8701.

Islam, M. I., Ainuddin, & Isnaeni, A. T. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Penadah Sebagai Penyerta Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencurian Kendaraan Bermotor (Studi Putusan NOMOR: 549/Pid.B/2023/ PN.MTR) Criminal. Unizar Recht Journal, 3(3).

Kukuh Dedy Rahmanto, K. D. R. (2022). Implementasi Pasal 480 Kuhp Dalam Upaya Mengungkap Tindak Pidana Penadahan Di Kepolisian Resort Semarang (Studi Kasus Perkara Penadahan) (Doctoral dissertation, UNDARIS).

Manullang, E. F. M. (2016). Selayang Pandang Sistem Hukum di Indonesia. KENCANA.

Mamahit, C. (2017). Aspek Hukum Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Penadahan dan Upaya Penanggulangannya di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Unsrat, 23(8).

Meysuari, R. (2024). Tindak Pidana Penadahan Barang Hasil Pencurian Ditinjau Menurut Hukum Pidana Islam (Studi Terhadap Putusan Hakimnomor 114/Pid. B/2016/Pn-Mbo Di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Negeri Meulaboh) (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh).

Naswan, A. (2022). Penerapan Kuhp Oleh Aparat Penegak Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penadahan Kendaraan Bermotor Di Kepolisian Resor Bantaeng (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Ahmad Dahlan).

Suharsoyo, A. (2020). Karakter pelaku tindak pidana pencurian dalam tipologi kejahatan pencurian di wilayah sukoharjo. Jurisprudence, 5(1), 64–74. https://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/jurisprudence/article/download/4222/2698

Thoriq, M. (2017). Penegakan Hukum Pasal 480 Kuhp Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penadahan Kendaraan Bermotor Oleh Polrestabes Surabaya. Novum: Jurnal Hukum, 4(1), 174-179.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-30

How to Cite

Ulfa Fatimah, Alex Prayoga Sidabutar, Jihan Aisyah Ramahdania, Dorlince O Hutapea, Parlaungan G Siahaan, & Dewi Pika Lbn Batu. (2026). Implementasi Pasal 480 KUHP terhadap Peran Pembeli Barang Hasil Kejahatan Sebuah Tinjauan dari Praktik Persidangan. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Humaniora, 5(1), 883–889. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v5i1.7073

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.