Analisis Yuridis terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Kupang Nomor 81/PID.SUS-TPK/2022/PN KPG Terkait Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam Penjualan Tanah Waris Tanpa Sertifikat kepada Pemerintah

Authors

  • Oktaviana Viska Viera Universitas Nusa Cendana
  • Aksi Sinurat Universitas Nusa Cendana
  • Deddy R. Ch. Manafe Universitas Nusa Cendana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v5i3.8171

Keywords:

Administrative Law, Article 3 Corruption Law, Corruption, Judge's Considerations, Legal Error

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the considerations of the judge in the decision of the Kupang District Court No. 81/Pid.Sus-TPK/2022/PN Kpg and the legal implications of the application of Article 3 of the Corruption Eradication Law. This research uses a normative legal method with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results show that the application of Article 3 of the Corruption Eradication Law in this case is incorrect, as the defendant is not a public official and does not have authority over the management of state finances or assets. It was also found that there was a misapplication of the law (error in juris), an error in determining the subject of the law (error in persona), and an inaccuracy in the object of the case (error in objecto). This study concludes that the case is more appropriately classified as an administrative error by state apparatus rather than a corruption crime. Academically, this research reinforces the distinction between administrative law and criminal law regarding corruption. Socially, this research emphasizes the importance of legal certainty protection and the prevention of criminalization of civil society. This study provides an important contribution to the development of legal theory, as well as the protection of individual rights in the context of criminal law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baidi, R., & Mulyana, A. (2024). Peran hakim memperkokoh integritas peradilan sebagai benteng penegakan hukum dan keadaban publik. Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia, 10(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.35194/jhmj.v10i1.4171

Darda Pasmatuti. (2019). Perkembangan pengertian tindak pidana korupsi dalam hukum positif di Indonesia. Ensiklopedia Social Review, 01(01), 100–109.

Fakrulloh, Z. A. (2011). Akuntabilitas kebijakan dan pembudayaan perilaku antikorupsi. Perspektif, 16(2), 105. https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v16i2.74

Fiantika, F. R., Wasil, M., Jumiyati, S., Honesti, L., Wahyuni, S., Mouw, E., Jonata, Mashudi, I., Hasanah, N., Maharani, A., Ambarwati, K., Noflidaputri, R., Nuryami, & Waris, L. (2022). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. In Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Issue March). Rake Sarasin.

Fuadi, A. B. (2021). Pertanggung jawaban pribadi dan jabatan dalam hukum administrasi negara. Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.14421/sh.v9i2.2158

Mallarangeng, A. B., & Ali, I. (2023). Pembuktian unsur niat dikaitkan dengan unsur mens rea dalam tindak pidana korupsi Andi. Legal Journal of Law, 2(2), 11–24.

Mayangsari, A. R. R., Sudarsono, & Negara, T. A. S. (2022). Kewenangan peradilan tata usaha negara dalam pengujian unsur penyalahgunaan wewenang yang terkait dengan tindak pidana korupsi. JURNAL HUKUM Dan KENOTARIATAN, 6(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.33474/hukeno.v6i2.17638

Pengadilan Tinggi Kupang. (2023). PT Kupang nomor 81/Pid.Sus-TPK/2022/PN Kpg.

Pratama, D. J., Ali, N., & Nugraha, S. (2025). Studi tentang implikasi pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi sebagai pelaku kejahatan ekonomi. MORALITY: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.52947/morality.v11i1.937

Rinaldi, R., & Rosmely, W. (2020). Pertimbangan hakim tingkat banding dalam menerapkan unsur-unsur pasal 2 dan pasal 3 undang-undang nomor 31 tahun 1999 tentang pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi (Studi putusan No. 3/TIPIKOR/2016/PT PDG dan No. 9/TIPIKOR/2017/PT PDG). UNES Law Review, 2(4), 392–407. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v2i4.132

Sharon, G. (2021). Teori wewenang dalam perizinan. Jurnal Justiciabelen, 3(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.30587/justiciabelen.v3i1.2249

Sugiyono. (2020). Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R & D.

Syarbaini, A. (2024). Terminologi korupsi menurut perspektif hukum pidana Islam. Jurnal Tahqiqa: Jurnal Ilmiah Pemikiran Hukum Islam, 18(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.61393/tahqiqa.v18i1.205

Yudhana, I. R. Y. A. F. W., Dawami, F., & Masruhin, N. Q. (2026). Tinjauan yuridis kerugian negara dalam tindak pidana korupsi badan usaha milik negara. Perspektif, 31(1), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v31i1.976

Yudistira. (2023). Pertanggungjawaban penjabat negara yang melakukan penyalahgunaan kewenangan (menurut perspektif hukum administrasi negara). Unes Law Review, 5(4), 4621–4636.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-23

How to Cite

Oktaviana Viska Viera, Aksi Sinurat, & Deddy R. Ch. Manafe. (2026). Analisis Yuridis terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Kupang Nomor 81/PID.SUS-TPK/2022/PN KPG Terkait Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam Penjualan Tanah Waris Tanpa Sertifikat kepada Pemerintah. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Humaniora, 5(3), 305–316. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v5i3.8171

Similar Articles

<< < 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.