Analisis Kasus Pembunuhan Mirna Salihin Berdasarkan Teori Negatife Wattelij dan Asas Keadilan, Kepastian dan Kebermafaatan Hukum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v4i3.5436Keywords:
Criminal, Negatief Wettelijk, EvidenceAbstract
The imposition of criminal penalties must be based on careful legal consideration and in accordance with the principle of Negatief Wettelijk, which is enshrined in the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). This principle requires that judges may only impose criminal penalties if there are at least two valid pieces of evidence that can fully explain the occurrence of the criminal act and the involvement of the defendant. In the case of the murder of Wayan Mirna Salihin, Jesica Kumala Wongso was designated as a suspect and sentenced by the prosecutor and judge. However, this designation sparked controversy because it did not meet the requirement of two valid pieces of evidence as stipulated in the Criminal Procedure Code. The decision against Jesica was deemed not to be based on complete and objective evidence, and therefore could be considered legally flawed when viewed from the principle of Negatief Wettelijk. Therefore, it is important for the criminal justice system to uphold the principles of legality and caution when rendering decisions.
Downloads
References
Butt, Simon. “Indonesia’s Criminal Justice System On Trial: The Jessica Wongso Case.” NEW Criminal Law Review | 24, no. July (2020): 1–23.
Cane, Pater. Administrative Law. Edited by Paul Craig. New York: CLARENDON LAW, 2005.
Gunawan, Yustitia Dwi Rahayu, and Sholahuddin Harahap. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Alat Bukti Dan Keyakinan Hakim Dalam Perkara Pidana Atas Nama Terdakwa Jessica Ku- mala Wongso Dimuka Pengadilan Jakarta Pusat.” Prosiding Ilmu Hukum, 2020, 466– 69.https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v32i1.4780.
Julyano, Mario, and Aditya Yuli Sulistyawan. “Pemahaman Terhadap Asas Kepas- Tian Hukum Melalui Konstruksi Penalaran Positivisme Hukum.” Jurnal Crepido 01 (2019): 13–22. https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/crepido/.
Kharisma, Asmaul. “Strategi Ketidaksantunan Praktisi Hukum Terhadap Saksi Ahli Dalam Sidang Jessica Kumala Wongso.” Nuansa Indonesia 20, no. 1 (2018): 1–14. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/ni/article/view/35796.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Indonesia
Laia, Fariaman, and Yonathan Sebastian Laowo. “Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Percobaan Pem- bunuhan.” Panah Keadilan 1, no. 31 (2022): 99–116. https://jurnal.uniraya.ac.id/index.php/PanahKeadilan/article/view/455/379.
Mulyadi, L. (2015). Asas Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia dihubungkan dengan Konvensi Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa anti Korupsi 2003. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 4(1), 101-132.
Newman, J. O. (1993). Beyond “Reasonable Doubt,”. NYUL REV., 68, 979.
Nugroho, Bastianto. “Peranan Alat Bukti Dalam Perkara Pidana Dalam Putusan Hakim Menurut Kuhap.” Yuridika 32, no. 1 (2017): 17.
Palsari, Cahya. “Kajian Pengantar Ilmu Hukum : Tujuan Dan Fungsi Ilmu Hukum Sebagai Da- sar Fundamental Dalam Penjatuhan Putusan Pengadilan.” E-Journal Komunitas Yustisia Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha 4, no. 3 (2021): 940–50.
Soraya, J., & Irawati, S. A. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Atas Hak Fair Trail Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Sistem Peradilan Indonesia. In Seminar Hukum Nasional Dan Call For Paper Dengan Tema “Membangun Hukum Pidana Dalam Negara Hukum Yang Demokratis (pp. 1-22).
Susanti Ante. “Pembuktian Dan Putusan Pengadilan Dalam Acara Pidana.” Lex Crimen II, no. 2 (2013): 98–104.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Rep[ublik Indonesia 1945
Yanto, Oksidelfa. Negara Hukum, Kepastian Keadilan Dan Kebermamfaatan Hukum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. 1st ed. Bandung: Pustaka Reka Cipta, 2008.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
