Studi Kasus Wanprestasi: Implikasi terhadap Perancangan Kontrak di Sektor Bisnis

Authors

  • Victor Karna Junior Universitas Trunojoyo Madura
  • Ghefari Albir Fachri Suherman Universitas Trunojoyo Madura
  • Lucky Dafira Nugroho Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v4i1.5155

Keywords:

Default, Breach of Contract, Contract Drafting, Legal Risk, Penalty Clauses, Dispute Resolution

Abstract

Default, or breach of contract, is a common problem in business transactions and can have significant impacts, both financially and non-financially. This article analyzes the various forms of default, such as failure to fulfill obligations, delays, or non-performance in accordance with the agreement. The impact of default is not only directly related to financial losses—for example through fines or damages—but can also damage business relationships and the company's reputation. Therefore, good contract design is very important in reducing this risk. Effective contract design should include clear clauses regarding obligations, deadlines, and sanctions that apply in the event of a breach. Penalty clauses are often used to provide incentives for the parties involved to fulfill their obligations. Furthermore, in the context of globalization and international transactions, it is important for contracts to include clear dispute resolution mechanisms, such as mediation or arbitration, to avoid escalation of problems. This article aims to provide practical guidance for companies in designing contracts that not only reduce the risk of default, but also ensure the sustainability of mutually beneficial business relationships. With a thorough understanding of legal risks and the implementation of appropriate mitigation measures, companies can maintain smooth operations and prevent major losses due to default.

 

Keywords : Default, Breach Of Contract, Contract Drafting, ,, , Mediation, Arbitration, Corporate Reputation, Risk Management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Fuady, M. (2005). Pengantar hukum bisnis. Jakarta: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Harahap, M. Y. (2002). Hukum acara perdata. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Salim, H. S. (2004). Perkembangan hukum kontrak di luar KUHPerdata. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Soekanto, S. (1996). Pengantar penelitian hukum. Jakarta: UI Press.

Soekanto, S., & Mahmudji, S. (2003). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Subekti. (2001). Hukum perjanjian. Jakarta: Intermasa.

Supramono, G. (2013). Perjanjian utang piutang. Jakarta: Kencana.

Umar, H. (2009). Metode penelitian untuk skripsi dan tesis bisnis. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Kurniawan, A. (2019). Implikasi wanprestasi terhadap keabsahan perjanjian dalam perspektif KUHPerdata. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum De’Jure, 9(1), 58.

Ramadhan, M. F. (2022). Analisis putusan pengadilan dalam kasus wanprestasi perjanjian jual beli. Jurnal Hukum Responsif, 7(1), 70.

Wulandari, S. (2020). Analisis yuridis terhadap bentuk wanprestasi dalam perjanjian kerja sama bisnis. Jurnal Hukum Lex Renaissance, 5(2), 119.

Yulianto, E. (2018). Penyelesaian sengketa kontrak bisnis melalui arbitrase dan mediasi di Indonesia. Hukum & Pembangunan, 48(4), 1023.

Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya. (2021). Putusan Nomor 82/Pdt.G/2021/PN.Sby.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-30

How to Cite

Victor Karna Junior, Ghefari Albir Fachri Suherman, & Lucky Dafira Nugroho. (2025). Studi Kasus Wanprestasi: Implikasi terhadap Perancangan Kontrak di Sektor Bisnis. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Humaniora, 4(1), 479–484. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v4i1.5155

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.