Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Konsumen dalam Perjanjian Baku di Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v4i2.4977Keywords:
Standard agreement, Consumer protection, Exculpation clause, Legal inequality, Consumer Protection ActAbstract
A standard agreement is a form of standard contract that is drawn up unilaterally by business actors, without providing flexibility for consumers to negotiate the content of the clauses contained therein. This characteristic creates an imbalance in the legal position between business actors and consumers, which in practice is often used to include exculpation clauses or unilateral clauses that are substantively detrimental to consumers. In the context of Indonesian law, this form of contract has become a common practice in various sectors, ranging from financial services to electronic transactions, so the urgency of legal protection for consumers has become increasingly significant. This research aims to analyze and evaluate the form of legal protection for consumers in standard agreements, based on the provisions of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection and related legal instruments, including implementing regulations and relevant jurisprudence. The research approach used is normative juridistic, with data collection methods through literature studies, normative analysis of laws and regulations, and an examination of several concrete case studies that illustrate imbalances in the legal relationship between consumers and business actors. The results of the study revealed that although normative legal protection has been regulated quite firmly, especially in the provisions regarding the prohibition of the inclusion of clauses that are detrimental or misleading to consumers, various structural and cultural obstacles are still found in its implementation. These obstacles include weak supervision mechanisms for business actors, limited consumer access to legal understanding, and suboptimal role of consumer dispute resolution institutions. Thus, it is necessary to strengthen regulations through more operational legal instruments, increase the capacity of supervisory institutions, and mainstream consumer legal literacy as a long-term strategy in realizing a fair, effective, and sustainable consumer protection system.
Downloads
References
Ardiansyah, M. (2019). Perlindungan Konsumen dalam Perjanjian Baku di Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Basri, H. (2020). “Keadilan Kontraktual dalam Perjanjian Baku: Studi Kasus di Sektor Jasa Keuangan.” Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 50(2), 245-267.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen.
Ismail, A. (2018). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen: Teori dan Praktik di Indonesia. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2007). Putusan No. 822 K/Pdt/2007 tentang Perjanjian Baku.
Nugroho, S. (2021). “Analisis Klausul Tidak Adil dalam Perjanjian Baku dan Implikasinya terhadap Perlindungan Konsumen.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 18(1), 53-70.
Prasetyo, B. (2017). Perjanjian Baku dan Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen. Yogyakarta: LaksBang Pressindo.
Rahardjo, M. (2016). “Perlindungan Konsumen dan Aspek Keadilan dalam Perjanjian Baku.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 12(3), 120-136.
Santoso, D. (2019). “Peran Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) dalam Menangani Sengketa Perjanjian Baku.” Jurnal Perlindungan Konsumen Indonesia, 7(1), 45-58.
Sihombing, F. (2018). Hukum Perjanjian di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





