Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Akibat Keabsahan Perjanjian Proyek Meikarta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v4i1.4550Keywords:
Legal uncertainty, Meikarta project, Validity of agreementAbstract
The Meikarta project as the "Shenzhen of Indonesia", is an ambitious initiative by the Lippo Group to develop a large property project in Cikarang, Bekasi Regency, West Java. Although it offers various modern facilities, this project faces various obstacles, including construction delays and uncertainty about the fate of consumers who have made payments. This problem is further complicated by allegations of violations of the law related to building permits (IMB) and non-compliance with the Regional Spatial Plan (RTRW), as well as bribery cases involving local government officials. This study aims to examine the legal protection provided to consumers in relation to the validity of agreements made in the Meikarta project, with a focus on the legal implications of unlawful acts and legal uncertainty due to corruption cases. This study uses a qualitative method with a normative legal approach, which examines applicable legal provisions, and an empirical approach, which examines how the law is applied in practice, as well as data collection techniques through case studies and legal literature. The results of the study indicate that there is abuse in the validity of contracts that are detrimental to consumers, as well as the negative impact of legal uncertainty caused by corrupt practices. Legal protection for consumers, including lawsuits and government intervention, is essential to prevent further losses. It is hoped that this research will contribute to the formation of better legal policies and more effective consumer protection in Indonesia.
Downloads
References
Amanda, A. (2024). Kerentanan kerja pada pekerja harian lepas di industri kreatif Indonesia. Journal Research of Management, 5(2), 186–204.
Badri, S., Handayani, P., & Rizki, T. A. (2024). Ganti rugi terhadap perbuatan melawan hukum dan wanprestasi dalam sistem hukum perdata. Jurnal USM Law Review, 7(2), 974–985.
Djunaid, A. A. R. R. (2024). Keabsahan perjanjian jual beli atas tanah yang mengandung unsur cacat kehendak (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Indonesia).
Gunawan, I. (2013). Teori dan praktik penelitian hukum normatif. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Hadjon, P. M. (1987). Perlindungan hukum bagi rakyat di Indonesia. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu.
Kadriah, A., & Sumarna, D. (2024). Analisis epistemologi kritis terhadap metode penelitian hukum perdata. Jurnal Supermacy of Law (Ilmu Hukum), 1(1), 1–25.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata Pasal 1320.
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2019). Laporan Tahunan KPK 2018: Kasus Suap Meikarta. Jakarta: KPK RI.
Marzuki, P. M. (2010). Penelitian hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.
Mugiri, E., Rachmawati, R., & Nuryanti, A. (2022). Perlindungan hukum pemegang polis dalam pelaksanaan pembaharuan perjanjian asuransi pada kasus gagal bayar PT Jiwasraya Pontianak. Tanjungpura Acta Borneo Jurnal, 1(1).
Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Bekasi No. 10 Tahun 2013.
Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Bekasi No. 12 Tahun 2011.
Peraturan Menteri PUPR No. 11/PRT/M/2019.
Prasetyo, T., & Barkatullah, A. H. (2011). Filsafat, teori, dan ilmu hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Rahardjo, S. (2006). Ilmu hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Subekti. (2004). Hukum perjanjian. Jakarta: Intermasa.
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





