Mekanisme Penyelidikan, Penyidikan Dan Mengadili Di Indonesia Pasca Orde Baru

Authors

  • Diah Resti Vilani Universitas Islam Negeri Surabaya
  • Niken Kurnia Yunita Universitas Islam Negeri Surabaya
  • Ahmat Luqman Nanda Universitas Islam Negeri Surabaya
  • David Aldo Wijaya Universitas Islam Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v2i2.1272

Keywords:

Investigators, investigation, independent judiciary, Soeharto, the orde baru

Abstract

Inquiry and investigation in the mechanism there is a difference between the two. Article 1 point 5 of the Criminal Procedure Code regulates investigations to determine whether an event that is suspected of being a crime is true before finally proceeding to the level of investigation. Where the investigation stage aims to determine the truth of a criminal act. After finding out who the perpetrators of the crime were, then in accordance with the constitution a court process will be carried out through an independent judicial power. Merdeka has the principle that judicial power must be free from any form of encouragement or interference from any outside party. It is different from the power to adjudicate in the post-New Order era where legal dualism occurred. This study uses a normative juridical method with a statutory approach (Statute Approach) regarding Law Number 14 of 1970 concerning Judicial Power in the New Order regime as well as a Case Approach (Case Approach) of legal dualism carried out by President Soeharto where presidential power is attached to legal authority. justice. The power of the president attached to the power of the judiciary will give birth to the independence or independence of the decisions of the judges because there is interference from the power of the president.

References

Ansori. “Penyelidikan Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana.” Paper Knowledge . Toward a Media History of Documents 3, no. April (2015): 49–58.

Fitriciada Azhari, Aidul. “Kekuasaan Kehakiman Yang Merdeka Dan Bertanggung Jawab Di Mahkamah Konstitusi: Upaya Menemukan Keseimbangan.” Jurnal Jurisprudence 2, no. 1 (2005): 89–118.

Imam Fawaid, Abd.Rahman. “Sejarah Hukum Peradilan Di Indonesia” 3, no. 1 (2022): 129–44.

Indonesia, Universitas Islam. “Perubahan Konsep Kemerdekaan Kekuasaan Kehakiman Dan Gagasan Pembaharuannya Dalam RUU Jabatan Hakim” (n.d.): 27–53.Lamijan, Tohari. “Kemandirian Dan Kemerdekaan Kekuasaan Kehakiman Di Indonesia” 3, no. 01 (2022): 30–49.

M. Yahya harahap. “Penyelidikan Adalah Serangkaian Tindakan Penyelidikan Untuk Mencari Dan Menemukan Suatu Peristiwa Yang Diduga Sebagai Tindak Pidana Guna Menentukan Dapat Atau Tidaknya Dilakukan Penyelidikan Menurut Cara Yang Diatur Dalam Undang-Undang Ini”” (n.d.): 13–44.

Nasution, Johan Bahder. “Sejarah Perkembangan Kekuasaan Kehakiman Di Indonesia Oleh: Dr. Bahder Johan Nasution, S.H.,M.Hum 1.” Inovatif VII, no. III (2014): 13–33.

Pujiyono. “Rekonstruksi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Kemandirian Kekuasaan Kehakiman.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 41, no. 1 (2018): 118–27.

Reksodiputro, Mardjono. “Rekonstruksi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia.” Jurnal Lex Specialis 1, no. 11 (2018): 1–10. http://jih.unbari.ac.id/index.php/LEX_SPECIALIST/article/view/98.

Ryan. “Tinjauan Tentang Penyelidikan Dan Penyidikan.” Paper Knowledge . Toward a Media History of Documents, 2018, 12–26.

Sagala, Budiman B. “Kekuasaan Kehakiman Yang Merdeka : Suatu Upaya Dalam Melaksanakan UUD 1945 Secara Murni Dan Konsekuen.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 16, no. 2 (2017): 153.

Subiyanto, Achmad Edi. “Mendesain Kewenangan Kekuasaan Kehakiman Setelah Perubahan UUD 1945.” Jurnal Konstitusi 9, no. 4 (2016): 661.

Suhendarto, Yosaphat Bambang. “Kekuasaan Kehakiman Pasca Amandemen Uud 1945 Kekuasaan Kehakiman Pasca Amandemen UUD 1945.” Kekuasaan Kehakiman Pasca Amandemen (2008).

Triningsih, Anna. “Proliferasi Lembaga-Lembaga Penegak Hukum Pada Era Reformasi Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Negara Indonesia.” Lex Jurnalica 15 (2018).

Yokana, Manurung Hendra. “Proses Penyelidikan Dan Penyidikan Kepolisian Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana.” Jurnal Darma Agung Penelitian Hukum 30 (2022): 145.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-03

How to Cite

Diah Resti Vilani, Niken Kurnia Yunita, Ahmat Luqman Nanda, & David Aldo Wijaya. (2023). Mekanisme Penyelidikan, Penyidikan Dan Mengadili Di Indonesia Pasca Orde Baru. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Humaniora, 2(2), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v2i2.1272

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.