Surat Perintah Penghentian Penyidikan (SP3) Yang Diterbitkan Berdasarkan Perdamaian Antara Tersangka dan Pelapor dalam Delik Biasa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v1i2.113Keywords:
Warrant for Termination of Investigation, Conditions for Termination of Investigation, PeaceAbstract
The Order for Termination of Investigation or hereinafter referred to as SP3 is the authority given attributively to criminal investigators. This paper intends to provide an analysis in terms of normative law regarding the validity of the termination of an investigation carried out based on reconciliation between the suspect and the complainant in the case of ordinary offenses. Research is a main means in developing a science and technology with the aim of revealing the existence of a truth both systematically, methodologically, and consistently through the research process as well as conducting analysis and construction of the data that has been processed and then concluded. Article 109 Paragraph (2) of Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) states that there are three conditions to stop an investigation of a criminal act. First, there is not enough evidence. Second, the act committed by the suspect is not a crime. Third, the investigation was stopped for the sake of law. The fact that the revocation of the police report resulted in the case being discontinued or terminated, as evidenced by the issuance of an Investigation Termination Order or SP3.
References
Eddy O.S Hiariej, Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana : Edisi Revisi (Yogyakarta : Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 2016) hlm 121. .
Widodo Ekatjahjana, Negara Hukum, Konstitusi, dan Demokrasi (Jember : Jember University Press, 2015) hlm 62. .
Adami Chazawi, Pelajaran Hukum Pidana Bagian I (Jakarta : RajaGrafindo, 2014) hlm 132. .
I Made Pasek Diantha, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum (Jakarta : Prenada Media Grup, 2016). .
F.A.M Stroink, 2006, Pemahaman Tentang Dekonsentrasi, dierjemahkan oleh Ateng Syafrudin, Refika Aditama, Bandung. .
Ridwan HR, Hukum Administrasi Negara, 2014 Edisi Revisi ,Jakarta , RajaGrafindo. .
Pasal 2 Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia. .
Pasal 1 angka 2 Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan. .
‘Pasal 1 angka 2 Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 (KUHAP)’.
Tholib Effendi, 2015, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Acara Pidana : Perkembangan dan Pembaharuannya di Indonesia, Malang, Setara Press). .
Pasal 7 Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 (KUHAP). .
Didik Endro Purwoleksono,2015, Hukum Acara Pidana Surabaya, Airlangga University Press. .
‘Pasal 184 ayat (1) KUHAP terdiri atas : a. keterangan saksi ; b. keterangan ahli ; c. surat ; d. petunjuk ; e. keterangan terdakwa.’
‘Aristo M.A Pangaribuan, Arsa Mufti, Ichsan Zikry,2017, Pengantar Hukum Acara Pidana di Indonesia ,Jakarta, RajaGrafindo’.
‘M. Yahya Harahap,2012, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP : Penyidikan dan Penuntutan, Jakarta : Sinar Grafika’.
