AI, Agriculture, and Decolonial Perspectives: Recognizing Local Knowledge for Sustainability

Julfikar Mawansyah; Mokh. Sholihul Hadi; Syaad Patmanthara

doi:10.55606/jurrafi.v4i3.7250

Authors

Julfikar Mawansyah Universitas Negeri Malang
Mokh. Sholihul Hadi Universitas Negeri Malang
Syaad Patmanthara Universitas Negeri Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrafi.v4i3.7250

Keywords:

Agriculture, Decolonial AI, Explainable AI (XAI), Local Knowledge, Sustainability

Abstract

This study explores the intersection of Artificial Intelligence (AI), agriculture, and decolonial philosophy, emphasizing the role of local knowledge as the foundation for sustainable agricultural technology in Indonesia. The research investigates how AI can be developed not as a tool of technological domination but as a dialogical partner that recognizes the epistemic value of indigenous wisdom. Using a mixed-method approach, the study combines algorithmic experiments applying lightweight Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) with Explainable AI (XAI) methods such as SHAP and LIME with participatory interviews involving farmers in Bima District. Empirical findings show that models integrated with localized visualization and community-based interpretability improved user trust by 84% and reduced computational energy by 28% without compromising accuracy. More importantly, the interaction between AI and farmers revealed a form of epistemic integration where algorithmic logic aligns with traditional indicators, such as soil texture, humidity, and seasonal signs known to local farmers. Philosophically, this research asserts that sustainable AI should emerge from ecological and cultural contexts rather than imposing external frameworks. In the decolonial sense, it positions local farmers not as passive users but as active epistemic agents shaping the meaning of technology. Thus, AI becomes not only a technical instrument but a site of ethical and epistemic liberation that reaffirms human responsibility toward knowledge, culture, and the earth.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anthony, L. F. W., Kanding, B., & Selvan, R. (2020). Carbontracker: Tracking and predicting the carbon footprint of training deep learning models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.03051.

Arrieta, A. B., et al. (2020). Explainable AI (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges. Information Fusion, 58, 82–115.

Benos, L., et al. (2021). Machine learning in agriculture: A comprehensive updated review. Sensors, 21(11), 3758.

CAST. (2025). Artificial intelligence in agriculture: Opportunities and risks. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology.

Chen, J., et al. (2020). Interpretable CNN for plant disease identification using Grad-CAM. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 175, 105618.

Chlingaryan, A., Sukkarieh, S., & Whelan, B. (2018). Machine learning approaches for crop yield prediction and nitrogen status estimation in precision agriculture using remote sensing. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 151, 61–69.

Dodge, J., Prewitt, T., Schwartz, R., Gardner, M., & Mitchell, M. (2022). Measuring the carbon intensity of AI in cloud instances. Proceedings of ACM FAccT, 187–197.

Doshi-Velez, F., & Kim, B. (2017). Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08608.

European Commission High-Level Expert Group on AI. (2019). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. European Commission.

European Commission. (2020). Assessment list for trustworthy artificial intelligence (ALTAI) for self-assessment. European Commission.

Ferentinos, K. P. (2018). Deep learning models for plant disease detection and diagnosis. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 145, 311–318.

Fjeld, J., Achten, N., Hilligoss, H., Nagy, A., & Srikumar, M. (2020). Principled AI: Mapping consensus in ethical and rights-based approaches to principles for AI (Berkman Klein Center Research Publication No. 2020-1).

Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1(1), 1–15.

Guidotti, R., et al. (2018). A survey of methods for explaining black-box models. ACM Computing Surveys, 51(5), 93.

Henderson, P., Hu, J., Romoff, J., Brunskill, E., Jurafsky, D., & Pineau, J. (2020). Towards the systematic reporting of the energy and carbon footprints of machine learning. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21(248), 1–43.

Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389–399.

Kamilaris, A., & Prenafeta-Boldú, F. X. (2018). Deep learning in agriculture: A survey. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 147, 70–90.

Kamilaris, A., & Prenafeta-Boldú, F. X. (2019). Blockchain in agriculture and food supply chains – A review. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 91, 640–652.

Kamilaris, A., et al. (2017). A review of IoT applications in agriculture. Agricultural Informatics, 8(1), 26–44.

Khaki, S., & Wang, L. (2019). Crop yield prediction using deep neural networks. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10, 621.

Lacoste, A., Luccioni, A., Schmidt, V., & Dandres, T. (2019). Quantifying the carbon emissions of machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.09700.

Li, D., & Wang, R. (2021). A review on data-driven irrigation scheduling. Agricultural Water Management, 245, 106513.

Li, L., Zhang, Q., & Huang, D. (2014). A review of imaging techniques for plant phenotyping. Sensors, 14(11), 20078–20111.

Li, X., et al. (2022). Explainable deep learning for plant disease detection: A systematic review. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 193, 106653.

Liakos, K. G., et al. (2018). Machine learning in agriculture: A review. Sensors, 18(8), 2674.

Lottes, P., et al. (2017). Vision-based precision agriculture: Weed detection and mapping. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 100, 3–14.

Luccioni, S., Viguier, S., & Ligozat, A.-L. (2022). Estimating the carbon footprint of BLOOM, a 176B parameter model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.02001.

Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Proceedings of NeurIPS, 4765–4774.

Mittelstadt, B. (2019). Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(11), 501–507.

Mohanty, S. P., Hughes, D. P., & Salathé, M. (2016). Using deep learning for image-based plant disease detection. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 1419.

Molnar, C. (2020). Interpretable machine learning. Leanpub.

OECD. (2019). OECD principles on artificial intelligence. OECD Publishing.

Omotayo, A. O., et al. (2025). Ethical and policy pathways for AI in agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 216, 108289.

Parekh, V., Patel, H., & Panchal, V. (2020). Smart irrigation: A review. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 13(3), 1–12.

Patterson, D., Gonzalez, J., Le, Q. V., Liang, C., & Dean, J. (2021). Carbon emissions and large neural network training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.10350.

Rahman, M. M., et al. (2022). A systematic review on AI-based plant disease detection. Information Processing in Agriculture, 9(4), 566–581.

Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016). “Why should I trust you?”: Explaining the predictions of any classifier. Proceedings of KDD, 1135–1144.

Saleem, M. H., et al. (2020). Plant disease classification using deep learning—A review. Sustainability, 12(22), 9602.

Schwartz, R., & Gururangan, S. (2022). Can green AI also be ethical AI? AI and Ethics, 2(4), 763–776.

Schwartz, R., Dodge, J., Smith, N. A., & Etzioni, O. (2020). Green AI. Communications of the ACM, 63(12), 54–63.

Singh, A., Ganapathysubramanian, B., Singh, A. K., & Sarkar, S. (2016). Machine learning for high-throughput stress phenotyping in plants. Trends in Plant Science, 21(2), 110–124.

Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019). Energy and policy considerations for deep learning in NLP. Proceedings of ACL, 3645–3650.

Tonekaboni, S., Joshi, S., McCradden, M. D., & Goldenberg, A. (2019). What clinicians want: Contextualizing explainable ML for clinical decision-making. Machine Learning for Healthcare, 359–380.

UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. UNESCO.

van der Velden, B., & Miller, S. (2020). XAI in environmental and agricultural decision support systems: A review. Environmental Modelling & Software, 132, 104816.

Wolfert, J., et al. (2020). Digital twins in smart farming: Opportunities and challenges. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 178, 105476.

Wolfert, S., Ge, L., Verdouw, C., & Bogaardt, M.-J. (2017). Big data in smart farming – A review. Agricultural Systems, 153, 69–80.

Wu, B., Liang, Y., Hsieh, C.-J., Kahn, J., & Ma, Q. (2022). Sustainable AI: Environmental implications, challenges and opportunities. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(5), 1–36.

Yuan, Q., et al. (2020). Deep learning in environmental remote sensing and agricultural applications. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 178, 105884.

Zhang, Y., et al. (2021). Interpretable machine learning in crop yield prediction using SHAP values. Agricultural Systems, 190, 103–117.