Analisis Semantik Lafadz Basyar, Insān, Nās, dan Banī Ādam dalam Al-Qur'an: Perspektif Ulama Klasik dan Kontemporer serta Implikasinya terhadap Pendidikan Islam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/cendekia.v6i2.9037Keywords:
Holistic Islamic Education, Qur'anic Human Terminology, Semantic Analysis, Tafsir Maudhū'ī, Thematic ExegesisAbstract
The Qur'an al-Karīm employs at least four principal terms in referring to human beings, namely al-basyar, al-insān, al-nās, and banī Ādam. These terms are not merely synonymous; rather, each represents distinct yet complementary dimensions of humanity in constructing a holistic concept of the human being. This study aims to: (1) analyze the semantic meanings of these four terms based on mufrodat studies, Makkiyah-Madaniyah classification, and asbābun nuzūl; (2) compare the interpretations of classical scholars - Al-Ṭabarī, Ibn Kathīr, Al-Qurṭubī, and Fakhr Al-Rāzī - with those of contemporary scholars - Sayyid Quṭb, Ibn ‘Āshūr, M. Quraish Shihab, and Buya Hamka; and (3) formulate their implications for Islamic education. This research employs a library research method using the tafsīr maudhū‘ī approach integrated with Izutsu’s semantic analysis model. The findings reveal that al-basyar represents the physical-biological dimension of human beings; al-insān represents the spiritual dimension in relation to ‘ubūdiyyah toward Allah; al-nās represents the social-collective dimension; and banī Ādam represents the intellectual-rational dimension inherited from Adam through the divine gift of teaching al-asmā’ (Qur'an 2:31). Collectively, these four dimensions provide fundamental implications for the development of objectives, curriculum, methodology, and evaluation within holistic and comprehensive Islamic education.
Downloads
References
Aba-Oli, Z., Koyas, K., & Husen, A. (2025). Higher-order thinking skills oriented problem-based learning interventions in mathematics: A systematic literature review. School Science and Mathematics, 125(3), 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12640
Agustinova, D. E., Wulansari, N. L. T., & Fitriana, K. N. (2025). Improving the professional competence of high school teachers in Yogyakarta through the development of classroom action research management based on Android mobile applications. Journal of Science and Education, 5(2), 499–519. https://doi.org/10.56003/jse.v5i2.442
Anwar, R. B., Rahmawati, D., & Wulandari, A. A. (2025). Trends in research on mathematical representation in mathematics learning: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 13(3), 698–714. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3577
Budiarto, M. K., Karsidi, R., & Rahman, A. (2024). E-learning platforms to enhance 21st century skills for vocational students: A systematic literature review. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 22(5), 76–90. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.22.5.3417
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Ferencová, J., Pirohová, I., Šuťáková, V., & Miňová, M. (2024). Development of teacher professional competence through action research as a form of professional development. Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia, 53, 128–143. https://doi.org/10.15388/ActPaed.2024.53.8
Fink, A. (2020). Conducting research literature reviews: From the internet to paper (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Hart, C. (2018). Doing a literature review: Releasing the research imagination (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpscog.2019.1.4.57
Kamarudin, M. Z., & Mat Noor, M. S. A. (2024). What do we know about the selection of action research methodologies in primary science education? A systematic literature review. Educational Action Research, 32(5), 825–847. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2023.2254170
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2
Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. EBSE Technical Report, Keele University and Durham University.
Kurniati, E., Suwono, H., Ibrohim, I., Suryadi, A., & Saefi, M. (2022). International scientific collaboration and research topics on STEM education: A systematic review. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11842
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
Mehddi, F., Kazi, A. S., & Butt, A. I. (2025). From theory to practice: How STEAM professional development shapes teacher beliefs and perceptions about design thinking activities. SAGE Open, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251355779
Ni, X., Nuryana, Z., Lu, S., & Xu, W. (2025). A systematic literature review of mathematics interactive games in elementary education. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2358127
Okoli, C. (2015). A guide to conducting a standalone systematic literature review. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37(1), 879–910. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03743
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Panakaje, N., Rahiman, H. U., Parvin, S. R., P., S., K., M., Yatheen, & Irfana, S. (2024). Revolutionizing pedagogy: Navigating technology integration in higher education for teacher learning and performance enhancement. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2308430. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2308430
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lelah Nurjamilah, Jaenal Mutaqin, Badruzaman M. Yunus, Endi Suhendi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
