Analisis Bisnis Model dan Kelayakan Investasi Bangunan Menara Telekomunikasi

Studi Komparatif Tipe Pole dan Greenfield di Kota Magelang

Authors

  • Muhammad Zaeni Universitas Islam Indonesia
  • Albani Musyafa Universitas Islam Indonesia
  • Sarwidi Sarwidi Universitas Islam Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jurritek.v5i2.9024

Keywords:

Business Model, Investment Feasibility, Life Cycle Costing, Magelang City, Telecommunication Tower

Abstract

Magelang City faces the challenge of limited land availability, with a total area of only 18.58 km2 and a high population density. Consequently, telecommunications infrastructure development requires a precise strategy. This study aims to analyze the business model and investment feasibility of Pole and Greenfield type telecommunication towers in Magelang City. Using a descriptive quantitative approach, this research processes secondary data from PT Dayamitra Telekomunikasi Indonesia by applying feasibility analysis based on Life Cycle Costing (LCC), Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Break-Even Point (BEP), Payback Period (PP), and Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR). The results indicate significant differences in cost structures; Pole towers proved to be more efficient, requiring an initial capital outlay of only 28.8% of the total capital required for Greenfield towers. Greenfield towers generated an NPV of Rp13.07 billion with an IRR of 20%, while Pole towers generated an NPV of Rp2.46 billion with a higher IRR of 23%. Pole towers have proven to offer a faster return on investment and better operational cost efficiency, making them the most strategic option to support network densification and the implementation of 5G technology in urban areas with spatial constraints like Magelang City.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

APJII. (2023). Laporan Survei Penetrasi Internet Indonesia 2023. Tersedia di: https://apjii.or.id.

DataGo Magelang. (2023). Statistik Kependudukan Kota Magelang 2023. Tersedia di: https://datago.magelangkota.go.id.

Giatman. (2006). Analisis Proyek Investasi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Kasmir, & Jakfar. (2008). Studi Kelayakan Bisnis. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Kirk, S. J., & Dell'Isola, A. J. (1995). Life Cycle Costing for Design Professionals. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Kumar, P., & Raut, R. (2017). Wireless Communication and Networks. Tata McGraw Hill Education.

Kumar, S. (2019). Telecom Towers: Emerging Business Models and Opportunities. Springer.

Luenberger, D. G. (1998). Invest ment Science. New York: Oxford University Press.

Nugraha, dkk. (2023). Analisa Kelayakan Investasi Pembangunan Perumahan Taman Amarta Brebes Ditinjau Dari Teknis Dan Ekonomi. Jurnal Konstruksi.

Norton, P.(1994). Understanding Financial Statements. Wiley

Poerbo, H. (1998). Studi Kelayakan Proyek Konstruksi. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Prasetyo, A. (2020). Analisis Kelayakan Investasi Pembangunan Tower Wilayah Surabaya. Laporan Penelitian..

Pujihartanti, 2022, Analisis Kelayakan Investasi Pembangunan Menara Bts (Base Transceiver Station) Oleh Provider Penyedia Menara (Survey Di Desa Lembur Awi, Kec Pacet, Kab Bandung). International Woman University. Vol. 3, No. 1. Maret 2022 e-ISSN 27 23-0120 p-ISSN 2828-351, Jurnal Pajak dan Bisnis.

Putri & Wessiani, 2020, Analisis Kelayakan Finansial Proyek Pembangunan Jaringan Telekomunikasi di Kawasan Wisata Nusa Penida, Bali (Studi Kasus: PT Telkom Indonesia (Persero) Tbk Witel Singaraja, Jurnal Teknik ITS Vol. 9. No. 2 (2020) ISSN: 2337-3539 (2301-9271 Print).

Rappaport, T. S. (2002). Wireless Communications: Principles and Practice. Prentice Hall.

Sakinah, Putra & Rumintang, 2021, Analisis Kelayakan Ekonomi Pada Pembangunan Perkantoran Tower Poros Maritim Surabaya.Universitas Pembangunan Nasional. P-ISSN: 2303-2693 E-ISSN: 2581-2939 Paduraksa: Volume 10 Nomer 2, Desember 2021.

Sumber Internet 1 (https://apjii.or.id/berita/d/apjii-jumlah-pengguna-internet-indonesia-tembus-221-juta-orang) di akses tanggal 20 Maret 2024.

Sumber Internet 2 (https://datago.magelangkota.go.id/frontend/item-dda?item=488 ) di akses tanggal 20 Agustus 2024.

Sumber Internet 3 (https://dpu.kulonprogokab.go.id/detil/1104/struktur-laporan-kajian-teknis-pemeriksaan-kelaikan-fungsi-bangunan-menara-telekomunikasi) di akses tanggal 29 Juni 2024.

Sumber Internet 4 (https://www.bps.go.id/id/pressrelease/2024/03/01/2301/inflasi-tahun-ke-tahun--y-on-y--pada-bulan-februari-2024-adalah-2-75-persen.html) di akses tanggal 20 Agustus 2024.

Sumber Internet 5 (https://www.towerbts.com/tower-sst/) di akses pada tanggal 6 September 2024.

Sumber Internet 6 (https://tokotower.com/product/tower-tripod/) di akses pada tanggal 6 September 2024.

Sumber Internet 7 (https://satriaintantower.blogspot.com) di akses pada tanggal 6 September 2024.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-05

How to Cite

Muhammad Zaeni, Albani Musyafa, & Sarwidi Sarwidi. (2026). Analisis Bisnis Model dan Kelayakan Investasi Bangunan Menara Telekomunikasi: Studi Komparatif Tipe Pole dan Greenfield di Kota Magelang. JURNAL RISET RUMPUN ILMU TEKNIK, 5(2), 480–492. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurritek.v5i2.9024

Similar Articles

<< < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.