Penanganan Masalah dalam Praktik Keinsinyuran: Evaluasi Uji Petik Preservasi Jalan di Kota Manado

Authors

  • Angelina I Titirlolobi Universitas Sam Ratulangi
  • Arthur H Thambas Universitas Sam Ratulangi
  • Ellen J Kumaat Universitas Sam Ratulangi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jurritek.v5i2.7742

Keywords:

Engineering, Quality Control, Risk Management, Road Preservation, Spot-Checking

Abstract

This study evaluates the implementation of spot-check testing for road preservation works in Manado City, specifically on the Kairagi–Mapanget segment, the Manado City–Wori boundary, and the Liwas Terminal Access Road, to identify existing problems and assess the effectiveness of engineering-based mitigation efforts. The objective is to examine construction quality compliance with technical specifications and identify operational challenges encountered on site. The methodology encompasses the measurement of asphalt layer thickness and density via a core drill, the examination of contract documents, the analysis of laboratory test results, and the execution of field observations. The findings show that most samples meet the required standards, although several locations require corrective action. Challenges arise from weather conditions, heavy traffic, equipment limitations, and the need for adaptation to updated technical regulations. Operational mitigation strategies, staff training, the use of core drill technology, and digital documentation were found to enhance accuracy and efficiency in evaluation. The research demonstrates the value of stakeholder collaboration and capacity building in supporting quality control for road preservation works. A multidimensional approach is effective in resolving technical and operational complexities in urban road projects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anthony, R. N., & Govindarajan, V. (1998). Management control system (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Balai Besar Jalan Nasional. (2018). Spesifikasi umum Bina Marga. Kementerian PUPR.

Balai Pelaksanaan Jalan Nasional Sulawesi Utara. (2024). Laporan kembali tugas uji petik preservasi jalan dalam Kota Manado, Kairagi–Mapanget, Bts. Kota Manado–Wori, jalan akses Terminal Liwas. BPJN Sulut.

Dipohusodo, I. (1996). Manajemen proyek & konstruksi (Jilid 2). Kanisius.

Direktorat Jenderal Bina Marga. (2022). Pedoman pengelolaan lingkungan hidup bidang jalan.

Djoko, S. Y. (2004). Bahan kuliah manajemen konstruksi. Fakultas Teknik Universitas Komputer Indonesia.

Effendi, R. (2020). Pengujian kualitas aspal untuk kendaraan bermotor. Graha Ilmu.

Enderzon, V. Y., & Soekiman, A. (2020). Manajemen risiko proyek konstruksi flyover di Indonesia dengan metode House of Risk (HOR). Media Teknik Sipil, 18(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.22219/jmts.v18i1.12267

Kerzner, H. (1982). Project management for executive. Reinhold Company.

Lombogia, R., Dundu, A. K., & Malingkas, G. Y. (2024). Metode pelaksanaan pekerjaan preservasi jalan ruas Kaiya–Kotamobagu. TEKNO, 22(87), 85–92.

Mahyuddin, Ritnawati, Rachim, F., Erdawaty, Mursalim, Pandarangga, A. P., Ulfiyati, Y., Sidiq, R., & Rosytha, A. (2023). Manajemen proyek konstruksi. Yayasan Kita Menulis.

Putra, S. (2022). Teknik pengujian material aspal. ITB Press.

Soeharto, I. (2001). Manajemen proyek (2nd ed.). Erlangga.

Suryanto, D. (2019). Mitigasi dampak lingkungan proyek infrastruktur jalan. Universitas Negeri Malang Press.

Tinambunan, Y. (2024). Manajemen risiko dalam proyek konstruksi: Evaluasi dan pengembangan model. Jurnal Ekonomi, Akuntansi dan Manajemen Indonesia (JEAMI), 3(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.58471/jeami.v3i01.599

Wang, S., Dulaimi, M., & Aguria, Y. (2004). Risk management framework for construction projects in developing countries. Construction Management and Economics, 22(3), 237–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144619032000124689

Downloads

Published

2026-02-23

How to Cite

Titirlolobi, A. I., Thambas, A. H., & Kumaat, E. J. (2026). Penanganan Masalah dalam Praktik Keinsinyuran: Evaluasi Uji Petik Preservasi Jalan di Kota Manado. JURNAL RISET RUMPUN ILMU TEKNIK, 5(2), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurritek.v5i2.7742

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.