Mediasi sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Pembayaran Letters of Credit

Authors

  • Erico Dian Pratama Universitas Sriwijaya
  • Christin Marito Lumban Toruan Universitas Sriwijaya
  • Zhafira Naifah Anidania Universitas Sriwijaya
  • Rizha Claudilla Putri Universitas Sriwijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v5i1.8621

Keywords:

Arbitration, Fraud, International Civil Law, Letter of Credit, Mediation

Abstract

Letter of Credit or L/C is a payment instrument in international trade transactions. Payment through a Letter of Credit is the most ideal form of payment in providing  payment certainty, because in its mechanism, L/C requires  payment to the seller through a bank guarantee with the fulfillment of the conditions specified in the document. Fraudulent letters of credit are disputes between parties in the execution of L/C payments caused by errors or irregularities due to fraud. As a result, in international civil agreements,  such agreements are deemed invalid. Mediation is a method of dispute resolution through non-litigation channels. In mediation, the dispute resolution mechanism is carried out by using a third party called a mediator. This method is highly dependent on the trust of the disputing parties in the mediator. In carrying out their duties, mediators act based on the principles of neutrality, confidentiality, voluntariness, empowerment, and as a provider of recommendations in the course of mediation for dispute resolution. Generally, mediation as a method is rarely applied in cases of international civil dispute resolution, because the resolution of international civil payment disputes is carried out through arbitration. Arbitration is a method of dispute resolution based on an arbitration agreement. An arbitration agreement is an agreement agreed upon by both parties to submit and surrender all matters to an arbitrator.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Christian, N., Basri, Y. Z., & Arafah, W. (2019). Analysis of fraud triangle, fraud diamond and fraud pentagon theory to detecting corporate fraud in Indonesia. The International Journal of Business Management and Technology, 3(4), 73–78.

Djumardin. (2017). Mediasi sebagai pilihan penyelesaian perselisihan. Jurnal Hukum Jatiswara, 30(3), 479–492. https://doi.org/10.29303/jtsw.v30i3.115

Effida, D. Q., Prastia, N., Trisna, N., & Yuana, A. (2025). Efektivitas penyelesaian sengketa melalui mediasi terhadap perkara perdata di Pengadilan Negeri Suka Makmue. Ius Civile: Refleksi Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan, 9(1), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.35308/jic.v9i1.11793

Gordon, C. (2023). Trends in international mediation: Growth of judicial and mandatory mediation. Mediate.co.uk. https://mediate.co.uk/blog/trends-in-international-mediation/

Hamid, A. (2024). Hukum mediasi dan peran mediator dalam penyelesaian sengketa. Penerbit Buku Indonesia.

Hartini, S. I. (2025). Efektivitas penyelesaian sengketa perdata melalui mediasi elektronik: Studi kasus implementasi di Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan. Veritas Procedura, 1(1), 1–25.

Indriati, N. R. (2024). Mediasi sebagai upaya penyelesaian sengketa perdata di luar pengadilan yang terjaga kerahasiaannya. Jurnal Mahkamah Keadilan, 2(1).

Irianti, Y. S. (2024). Penegakan hukum atas penyalahgunaan letter of credit sebagai alat pembayaran dalam transaksi ekspor-impor. BULLET: Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu, 3(6), 695–703.

Istianah, I. (2021). Peran letter of credit dalam kontribusinya terhadap perkembangan ekonomi nasional melalui perbankan syariah. Jurnal Investasi Islam, 2(1), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.32806/ivi.v2i1.90

Maharani, A. S. (2018). Analisis fraud pentagon theory dalam mendeteksi kecurangan laporan keuangan (Studi pada perusahaan LQ-45 yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2014–2016) [Skripsi, Universitas Brawijaya].

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2016). Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang prosedur mediasi di pengadilan. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id

Natamiharja, R., Panjaitan, O. D. A., & Setiawan, I. (2025). Arbitrase internasional: Evaluasi efektivitasnya sebagai mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa alternatif. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 4(2), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.35912/jihham.v4i2.3297

Nugraha, B. A., & Andraini, F. (2023). Perlindungan hukum terhadap eksportir dan importir dalam transaksi ekspor impor barang dengan menggunakan letter of credit (L/C) sebagai alat pembayaran. Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 5(2), 1627–1646. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i2.3428

Pablo, J. (2024). Effectiveness of mediation and arbitration as alternative dispute resolution methods in Mexico. Journal of Conflict Management, 4(1), 38–50. https://doi.org/10.47604/jcm.2383

Pakpahan, A., Saragih, H. R., Wisatrioda, B., Laia, K., Hardjomuljadi, S., & Sami’an, S. A. (2025). The effectiveness of arbitration mechanisms in the resolution of construction disputes in Indonesia: A critical analysis of Law No. 30 of 1999 on arbitration and alternative dispute resolution. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 6(1), 803–808. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2619

Peraturan Menteri Perdagangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 33 Tahun 2023 tentang pencabutan Peraturan Menteri Perdagangan Nomor 94 Tahun 2018 tentang ketentuan penggunaan letter of credit untuk ekspor barang tertentu sebagaimana telah diubah dengan Peraturan Menteri Perdagangan Nomor 102 Tahun 2018. (2023). Berita Negara Republik Indonesia.

Ruslan, Z. (2022). Letter of credit: Uniform custom practice dan fraud dalam perdagangan internasional. Equity: Jurnal Ekonomi, 10(2), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.33019/equity.v10i2.118

Sastrowiyono, A. A. F. (2019). The pros and cons of arbitration: A study of international arbitration with perspective of Indonesian and Korean law. Lex Renaissance, 4(2), 231–247. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol4.iss2.art2

Singapore International Dispute Resolution Academy. (2024). SIDRA international dispute resolution survey 2024 final report. Singapore Management University. https://sidra.smu.edu.sg

Stella, H., & Lie, H. (2025). Penggunaan pembayaran letter of credit dalam mendukung perdagangan internasional. JLEB: Journal of Law Education and Business, 3(2), 992–1002. https://doi.org/10.57235/jleb.v3i2.7114

Talli, A. H. (2015). Mediasi dalam PERMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2008. Jurnal Al-Qadau: Peradilan dan Hukum Keluarga Islam, 2(1), 76–93.

Wulandari, A., Soleha, D. M., & Wulandari, R. (2023). Analisis dampak globalisasi terhadap perdagangan internasional. J-MAS (Jurnal Manajemen dan Sains), 8(1), 1160–1165. https://doi.org/10.33087/jmas.v8i1.1202

Yasid, M. (2025). Mediation as an alternative to resolving problematic credit in banking financial institutions. Rechtsvinding: Jurnal Civiliza, 3(2), 265–274. https://doi.org/10.59525/rechtsvinding.v3i2.1054

Downloads

Published

2026-01-31

How to Cite

Erico Dian Pratama, Christin Marito Lumban Toruan, Zhafira Naifah Anidania, & Rizha Claudilla Putri. (2026). Mediasi sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Pembayaran Letters of Credit. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Humaniora, 5(1), 926–939. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v5i1.8621

Similar Articles

<< < 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.