Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Memberikan Izin Poligami Terhadap Suami Yang Melakukan Perzinahan dalam Putusan Pengadilan Agama Tanjung Karang Nomor: 737/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Tnk
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v5i2.7087Keywords:
Adultery, Joint Property, Judicial Consideration, Polygamy Permit, Religious CourtAbstract
This study discusses the judge’s considerations in granting permission for polygamy to a husband who had committed adultery, as stated in the Religious Court Decision of Tanjung Karang Number: 737/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Tnk. Generally, Law No. 1 of 1974 in conjunction with Law No. 16 of 2019 on Marriage upholds the principle of monogamy but allows polygamy under certain conditions with court approval. This case is particularly interesting because the court granted permission for polygamy to a husband who was proven to have engaged in an affair and committed adultery resulting in a child born out of wedlock. The study aims to identify the legal considerations of the judge and the legal implications regarding the marriage and joint property. The research employs an applied normative legal method with a qualitative approach, using primary data from interviews and secondary data from legislation and legal literature. The results show that the judge considered granting permission for polygamy as a means of legalizing the existing relationship to maintain public morality and prevent continuous sinful behavior, although it conflicts with moral values. Legally, the second wife has no rights over the joint property acquired before the polygamous marriage, as stipulated in Article 65 paragraph (1) letter b of the Marriage Law
Downloads
References
Asyhadie, H. Zaeni, Sahruddin, Lalu Hadi Adha, H. Israfil, Hukum Keluarga Menurut Hukum Positif Di Indonesia, Depok: Rajawali Press, 2020
Bambang Sunggono, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Rajawali Press. Jakarta, 2015.
Corliana, Tellys. Resistensi Perempuan Terhadap Praktek Poligami sebagai Dekontruksi Ideologi Patriarkhi. Jakarta: UHAMKA Press, 2017.
Harahap, M. Yahya. Hukum Acara Perdata, Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian dan Putusan Pengadilan. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2017.
Maslan, D. “Harmonisasi Konsep Poligami dengan Prinsip-Prinsip Moderasi Beragama: Refleksi atas Nilai-Nilai Keseimbangan dan Keadilan”. Book Chapter of Proceedings Journey-Liaison Academia and Society, 2 (1), 2023
Mubarok, Fuad, M., Sukandi, A., & Maimun. “Analisis Terhadap Pemikiran Husein Muhammad Tentang Konsep Poligami” El-Izdiwaj: Indonesian Journal of Civil and Islamic Family Law, 3 (1), 2022.
Muhammad, Abdulkadir Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2004
Muhammad, Husein. Poligami, Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD, 2020.
Muzayim, Ahmad, Imron Choeri, Syamsul Ma’arif, “Kajian Yuridis Perkawinan Poligami Terhadap Keharmonisan Rumah Tangga” Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2024.
Rifqi, .Muhammad Mualimar dkk,“Keadilan Dalam Poligami Perspektif Madzhab Syafi’i” Jurnal Himatnya Vol 1 No. 2 2019.
Rodani, Poligami Dalam Pandangan Manusia (Pendekatan Teologis,Sosiologis dan Psikologis), Serang: Putri Kartika Banjarsari, 2019.
Sunarto. Prinsip Hakim Aktif dalam Perkara Perdata (The Principle Of Active Judge In Civil Case), Disertasi Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum Universitas Airlangga, 30 Agustus 2012.
Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan
Wijayanta, Tata Sandra Dini Febri Aristya, Kunthoro Basuki, Herliana, Hasrul Halili, Sutanto, dan Retno Supartinah. Penerapan Prinsip Hakim Pasif dan Aktif Serta Relevansinya Terhadap Konsep Kebenaran Formal. Laporan Penelitian Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 2009, hlm.572.
Zulkarnain, Muhammad Farid “Adil Dalam Poligami Menurut Imam Madzhab (Metode Istinbath Hukum dan Argumentasinya Masing-masing), Al- Wathan: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Vol. I, No. I, 2020.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
