Military and Civil Society in Conflict Areas: A Sociological-Legal Study on the Dynamics of Power and Legitimacy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v5i3.8614Keywords:
Civil society, Conflict, Legitimacy, Military, Sociology of lawAbstract
This article examines the complex interactions between the military and civil society in regions affected by conflict, approached from a sociological-legal perspective. The study seeks to understand how military power influences civil society, the ways in which legal and social legitimacy are established, and how local communities respond to military presence and control. Employing a qualitative case-study methodology, the research utilized in-depth interviews with community members and military personnel, extensive field observations, and detailed analysis of relevant legal documents. The findings reveal that military power structures significantly impact civil rights, security, and social dynamics, with interactions ranging from cooperative engagement to open conflict. Furthermore, the legitimacy of military actions is closely linked to factors such as operational performance, transparency, accountability, and social acceptance by local populations. Based on these insights, the article argues for the importance of improving communication channels between military forces and communities, integrating formal legal frameworks with local norms and practices, and actively involving community members in security and governance programs. These measures are proposed as strategies to enhance the legitimacy of military operations, reduce conflict, and promote long-term social stability. The study contributes to the broader understanding of civil-military relations by highlighting the sociological and legal dimensions of military influence in conflict-affected areas.
Downloads
References
Beetham, D. (2013). The legitimation of power (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-36117-2
Buzan, B., & Wæver, O. (2003). Regions and powers: The structure of international security. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491252
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Ehrlich, E. (2002). Fundamental principles of the sociology of law. Transaction Publishers.
Flick, U. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Vintage Books.
Gurr, T. R. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton University Press.
Huntington, S. P. (1957). The soldier and the state: The theory and politics of civil-military relations. Harvard University Press.
Janowitz, M. (1960). The professional soldier: A social and political portrait. Free Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/1891771
Kaldor, M. (2012). New and old wars: Organized violence in a global era (3rd ed.). Stanford University Press.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
Tilly, C. (2008). Contentious performances. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804366.002
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. University of California Press.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
