Penerapan Istishab dalam Penetapan Fatwa Dewan Syariah Nasional Majelis Ulama Indonesia (DSN-MUI) Tentang Rahn Tasjily dan Rahn Emas

Authors

  • Muhammad Panca Prana Mustaqim Sinaga Universitas Sains Indonesia
  • Muhammad Mahendra Maskhur Sinaga Universitas Islam Bandung
  • Zahra Malinda Putri Universitas Sains Indonesia
  • Salsabila Adinda Syarif Universitas Indonesia
  • La Ode Mbunai Universitas Sains Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v3i3.6686

Keywords:

DSN-MUI Fatwa, Legal Istishab, Muamalat Shariah, Rahn Emas, Rahn Tasjily

Abstract

Understanding the methods used by the National Sharia Council of the Indonesian Ulema Council (DSN-MUI) is important to be understood by the public in order to gain stronger confidence in the implementation of its fatwa. Of the various methods of determining law or ijtihad, one of the ones used by DSN-MUI is Istishab. The purpose of this study is to analyze the application of the Istishab ijtihad method in determining fatwas in DSN-MUI, especially fatwa on rahn tasjily and rahn emas. The research method used uses a Qualitative method with a normative juridical approach that uses secondary and analytical descriptive data as the data analysis technique used. The results of this study state that one of the legal sources used by DSN-MUI in formulating its fatwa is istishab. In general, in the application of istishab in its fatwa, DSN-MUI in most of its fatwas uses the rules derived from isitishab in the form of the law of origin of muamalat is permissible. However, there are two fatwas that clearly show the use of istishab in the issuance of fatwa, namely in Fatwa D about Rahn Emas and Rahn Tasjily. In both fatwas, the elements that become the harmony and conditions in the use of istishab as a legal evidence have been fulfilled, both of which are related to rahn in general that have taken place in the past, which then these postulates are used to determine the applicability of the rahn law in the present time which is used in the form of golden rahn and rahn tasjily. In addition, it also uses derivative rules from istihab itself in the form of the basic law of muamalat, which is permissible until there is evidence that supports it.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Basri, H., & Azani, M. (2019). Pelaksanaan Akad Rahn Di Pegadaian Syariah Berdasarkan Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Di Pekanbaru. Gagasan Hukum, 1(2), 162-176.

Galini, J., Damayanti, N., Pratama, P., & Haresma, I. A. (2020). Klausul Akad Rahn. Al-Tsaman : Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Islam, 3(2), 1-13.

Haq, H. (2017). Penggunaan Istishab dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Perbedaan Ulama. Alhurriyah : Jurnal Hukum Islam, 2(1), 17-30.

Has, A. W. (2013). Ijtihad Sebagai Alat Pemecahan Masalah Umat Islam. Episteme, 8(1), 89-112.

Junitama, C. A., Rahmawati, E. D., & Karina, M. (2022). Rahn (Gadai) Dalam Perspektif Fikih Muamalah, Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah (KHES), dan Hukum Perdata. Maliyah : Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Islam, 12(1), 26-46.

Khairina, N., & Bustamam, D. (2018). Perjanjian dan Jaminan Fidusia. Jurnal Justisia, 3(2), 307-331.

Misbahuzzulan. (2013). Istishab: Sejarah dan Posisinya. Al Majaalis : Jurnal Dirasat Islamiyah, 1(1), 107-132.

Mubarok, J. (2002). Metodologi Ijtihad Hukum Islam. Yogyakarta: UII Press.

Muhaimin, U. (2017). Metode Istidlal Dan Istishab (Formulasi Metodologi Ijtihad). Yudisia, 8(2), 330-350.

Muhaimin. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum Vol. 1. Mataram: Mataram University Press.

Nu’man, M. H. (2018). Implementasi Akad Rahn Tasjily Dalam Lembaga Pembiayaan Syari’ah, AKTUALITA : Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan, 1(2), 609-620.

Nursyamsu. (2016). Gadai Emas di Perbankan Syariah. Bilancia : Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 10(1), 113-133.

Prasetyo, H. L., Ahmad, S., & Lutfi, A. (2024). Pengawasan KPPU Pada Pelaku Usaha Mikro, Kecil dan Menengah Dalam Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat di Era Digital. Binamulia Hukum, 13(1), 225–237.

Puta, P. A. A. (2021). Aplikasi Konsep dan Kaidah Istishab dalam Hukum Ekonomi Syariah. Jurnal Intelektualita: Keislaman, Sosial, dan Sains, 10(1), 109-123.

Putra, P. A. (2022). Fatwa (al-ifta’); Signifikansi Dan Kedudukannya Dalam Hukum Islam. Al-Mutharahah: Jurnal Penelitian dan Kajian Sosial Keagamaan, 19(1), 27-38.

Putri, A. R., Machmud, A. & Sadino, S. (2025). Analisis Hukum Terhadap Penolakan Tagihan Pajak dalam Proses Kepailitan PT Swissindo Marine. Binamulia Hukum, 14(1), 131–140.

Ridwan. (2011). Istishab dan Penerapannya dalam Hukum Islam. Al-Manahij : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 5(1), 1-14.

Rosyadi, I. (2020). Usul Fikih Hukum Ekonomi Syariah. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press.

Rosyid, M.( 2018). Istishab Sebagai Solusi Pemecahan Masalah Kekinian. SYARIAH: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran, 18(1), 45-64.

Saidurrahman. (2011). Istishab Sebagai Dasar Penetapan Hukum Islam : Sebuah Tinjauan Hadis. Jurnal Asy-Syir’ah, 45(1), 1037-1050.

Syarifuddin, A. (2008). Ushul Fiqh. Jakarta: Kencana.

Wirdyaningsih. (2005). Bank dan Asuransi Syariah di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana.

Zahra, M. A. (2019). Ushul Fiqih. Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus.

Zain, I., Abbas, S., & Idami, Z. (2019). Akad Rahn Dari Perspektif Hukum Islam Dan Urgensi Notaris Dalam Penyusunannya. JH Lus Quia Lustum, 26(2), 391-406.

Zakirman, A. (2016). Metodologi Fatwa Majelis Ulama Insonesia. Al-Hikmah: Jurnal Dakwah, 10(2), 157-172.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-30

How to Cite

Muhammad Panca Prana Mustaqim Sinaga, Muhammad Mahendra Maskhur Sinaga, Zahra Malinda Putri, Salsabila Adinda Syarif, & La Ode Mbunai. (2025). Penerapan Istishab dalam Penetapan Fatwa Dewan Syariah Nasional Majelis Ulama Indonesia (DSN-MUI) Tentang Rahn Tasjily dan Rahn Emas. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Humaniora, 3(3), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v3i3.6686

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.