Populisme Punitif dan Erosi Nilai-Nilai Hukum : Mengupas Kebijakan Kriminal di Tengah Polarisasi Sosial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v4i4.5241Keywords:
Criminal Policy, Law, Populism, Social Polarization, SocialAbstract
Punitive populism is a political-legal phenomenon that replaces legal rationality and corrective justice with a rhetoric of power that negates the protection of human rights and the rehabilitative function of the criminal justice system. In this context, criminal policy tends to be characterized by a repressive approach that prioritizes symbolic punishment for short-term political legitimacy. Social polarization further strengthens the destructive power of punitive populism by making the issue of crime a symbolic instrument in identity conflicts, thereby losing its autonomy and submitting to an emotional, majoritarian logic. This study aims to analyze how punitive populism, as a product of the interaction between populist logic and social polarization, results in the erosion of the basic values of modern law, particularly the principles of proportionality, legal certainty, and human rights protection. Furthermore, this study also identifies structural barriers that hinder efforts to curb its expansion in criminal policy. The study uses qualitative methods with a conceptual approach. Data were obtained through library research of academic literature, legal documents, and policy analysis, then processed using qualitative analysis techniques and presented descriptively. The research findings show that punitive populism has shifted the orientation of criminal policy from a paradigm of justice and rehabilitation to a logic of punishment that is reactive to public emotional distress. The mass media, particularly within a polarized information ecosystem, plays a role in shaping distorted perceptions of crime, thereby reinforcing public demands for harsh and immediate policies. This situation creates legal vulnerability to political instrumentalism, threatens the principle of the rule of law, and deepens social exclusion of vulnerable groups. To address this, strategic steps are needed, including limiting fear-based political rhetoric, strengthening independent legal institutions, and rebuilding a criminal law paradigm based on substantive justice, inclusivity, and respect for human rights.
Downloads
References
Akili, R. H. S. (2023). The role of the legislature in maintaining the balance of power in the constitutional legal system. Jurnal Multidisiplin Sahombu, 3(1), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.58471/jms.v3i01.1791
Badillo, R., & Mijares, V. M. (2021). Politicised crime: Causes for the discursive politicisation of organised crime in Latin America. Global Crime, 22(4), 312–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/17440572.2021.2024804
Boda, Z., Toth, M., & Hollan, M. (2022). Two decades of penal populism – The case of Hungary. Review of Central and East European Law, 47(1), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1163/15730352-bja10060
Bonner, M. (2021). What is punitive populism? A typology based in media communication. Matrizes, 15(1), 77–102. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v15i1p77-102
Burton, A. L., Cullen, F. T., Burton, V. S., Graham, A., Butler, L. C., & Thielo, A. J. (2020). Belief in redeemability and punitive public opinion: “Once a criminal, always a criminal” revisited. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(6), 712–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820913585
Cervi, L., Tejedor, S., & Dornelles, M. A. (2020). When populists govern the country: Strategies of legitimization of anti-immigration policies in Salvini’s Italy. Sustainability, 12(1), 10225. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310225
Chan, V., Estrella, M. J., Syed, S., Lopez, A., Shah, R., Colclough, Z., Babineau, J., Beaulieu-Dearman, Z., & Colantonio, A. (2023). Rehabilitation among individuals with traumatic brain injury who intersect with the criminal justice system: A scoping review. Frontiers in Neurology, 13, 1052294. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.1052294
Fadhilah, N. (2024). The influence of mass media on public perception of criminal cases: A qualitative approach. Journal of Strafvordering Indonesian, 1(2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.62872/5scm0g45
Felson, R. B., & Krajewski, A. T. (2020). Did mass incarceration lead to the disproportionate admission of minorities and marginal offenders? Criminology and Public Policy, 19(1), 1209–1229. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12521
Hilbink, L., Salas, V., Gallagher, J. K., & Restrepo Sanin, J. (2021). Why people turn to institutions they detest: Institutional mistrust and justice system engagement in uneven democratic states. Comparative Political Studies, 55(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140211024299
Janderov, J., & Hubalkova, P. (2021). Legal certainty – Protected values and partial objectives: The case of the Czech Republic. Central European Public Administration Review, 19(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2021.1.03
Jeon, D. (2024). Does the majority rule principle support the rule of law (constitutionalism)? Baron Academy of History, 19(1), 379–423. https://doi.org/10.55793/jkhc.2024.19.379
Kadir, Z. K. (2024). Menggugat netralitas hukum pidana: Perdebatan ideologis di balik kebijakan kriminal di negara-negara liberal. Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara, 2(4), 380–400. https://doi.org/10.55606/eksekusi.v2i4.1546
Koudenburg, N., & Kashima, Y. (2021). A polarized discourse: Effects of opinion differentiation and structural differentiation on communication. Empirical Research Paper, 00(0), 1–19.
Moura, J. A. de, & Monteiro, M. B. (2024). From education to social justice: A regression examination of education and economic inequality effects on property crimes. Socioeconomic Analytics, 2(1), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.51359/2965-4661.2024.262687
Orr, Z., & Ajzenstadt, M. (2020). Beyond control: The criminalization of African asylum seekers in Israel. International Review of Sociology, 30(1), 142–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2020.1724369
Rhodes-Purdy, M. (2021). Lock them up! Punitive aggression and populism as political vigilantism. Electoral Studies, 74, 102415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102415
Roberts, K. M. (2021). Populism and polarization in comparative perspective: Constitutive, spatial and institutional dimensions. Government and Opposition, 57(1), 680–702. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2021.14
Runturambi, A. J. S., Aswindo, M., & Meiyani, E. (2021). No viral no justice: A criminological review of social media-based law enforcement from the perspective of progressive law. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, 12(1), 177–195. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v12i1.1361
Uhl, A., & Pickett, J. T. (2024). The (in)stability of punishment preference: Implications for empirical desert. The British Journal of Criminology, 10(10), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azae088
Welsh, B. C., Yohros, A., & Zane, S. N. (2020). Understanding iatrogenic effects for evidence-based policy: Review of crime and violence prevention programs. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 55, 101511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2020.101511
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
