Filsafat Tao sebagai Kritik Ekologis atas Krisis Lingkungan Poco Leok

Authors

  • Fernandes Fernando Universitas Sanata Dharma

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrafi.v4i3.7151

Keywords:

Poco Leok, Taoism, Ecological Crisis, Social Justice, Sustainable Development

Abstract

The global environmental crisis is increasingly alarming, with deforestation and resource exploitation severely impacting ecosystems and local communities. In Indonesia, Flores Island has become a strategic site for geothermal projects, including the planned drilling in Poco Leok, Manggarai, East Nusa Tenggara. This project has provoked strong resistance from local communities due to ecological threats such as deforestation, biodiversity loss, water pollution, and water scarcity, all of which exacerbate social vulnerability, particularly among women. This study employs a qualitative literature-based analysis using Taoist philosophy as an interpretive framework. The principles of Yin–Yang, Wu Wei, and Ziran are applied as reflective lenses to identify the root of the crisis: the imbalance in human–nature relations caused by exploitative and dominant development models. The findings demonstrate that economy-driven development undermines ecological harmony and local wisdom, thereby deepening social hardship. In contrast, Taoist philosophy offers an alternative paradigm that emphasizes balance, harmony, and respect for the natural order. Addressing the Poco Leok conflict therefore requires not only a reassessment of policy but also a paradigm shift in development toward ecological justice and inclusive, sustainable well-being.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ames, R. T., & Hall, D. L. (2003). Dao De Jing: A philosophical translation (pp. 45–78). Ballantine Books.

Capra, F. (2010). The Tao of physics: An exploration of the parallels between modern physics and Eastern mysticism (5th ed., pp. 261–289). Shambhala.

Chen, E. (2011). Understanding the Yin-Yang philosophy: A critical interpretation (pp. 112–134). Foreign Language Press.

Girardot, N. J., Miller, J., & Liu, X. (2001). Daoism and ecology: Ways within a cosmic landscape (pp. 25–41). Harvard University Press.

Kementerian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral Republik Indonesia. (2017). Keputusan Menteri ESDM No. 2268 K/30/MEM/2017 tentang Penetapan Pulau Flores sebagai Pulau Panas Bumi. KESDM.

Kohn, L. (1993). The Taoist experience: An anthology (pp. 88–90). State University of New York Press.

Kohn, L. (2001). Daoism and Chinese culture (2nd ed.). Three Pines Press.

Laozi. (2001). Dao De Jing (D. C. Lau, Trans., p. 17). Penguin Classics.

Laozi. (2003). Tao Te Ching (J. Legge, Trans., pp. 45–47). Dover Publications.

Milko, V. (2024). Coal mining and deforestation in Indonesia: A global perspective (pp. 3–5). Mongabay. https://news.mongabay.com

Miller, J. (2003). Daoism and nature: The ecological implications of Daoist philosophy. Environmental Ethics, 25(3), 245–262.

Mongabay. (2023). Geothermal conflict in Poco Leok: Community resistance in Flores. https://www.mongabay.co.id

Ritchie, H. (2021). Deforestation and forest loss (pp. 1–2). Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/deforestation

Shiva, V. (2005). Staying alive: Women, ecology and development (2nd ed., pp. 70–73). Zed Books.

Walhi NTT. (2023). Laporan dampak ekologis dan sosial proyek panas bumi Poco Leok. Wahana Lingkungan Hidup Indonesia NTT.

World Wildlife Fund (WWF). (2019). Mining and deforestation report 2001–2019 (pp. 33–47). WWF International. https://ourworldindata.org/drivers-of-deforestation

Downloads

Published

2025-11-05

How to Cite

Fernandes Fernando. (2025). Filsafat Tao sebagai Kritik Ekologis atas Krisis Lingkungan Poco Leok. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Agama Dan Filsafat, 4(3), 446–455. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrafi.v4i3.7151

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.