Analisis Perhitungan Volume Beton Metode Konvensional dan BIM Autodesk Revit pada Proyek Jembatan Tipe Lengkung terhadap Efektivitas Biaya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jurritek.v5i2.9327Keywords:
Autodesk Revit, Building Information Modeling (BIM), Concrete Volume, Conventional Method, Cost EffectivenessAbstract
Concrete volume calculation is a crucial factor in preventing cost overruns when preparing the Budget Plan (RAB) for construction projects. In arch bridge projects, the complex structural geometry often makes conventional volume calculation methods complicated and prone to errors, particularly due to the geometric complexity of the arch beams. This study aims to analyze the comparison of concrete volume calculation results between the conventional method and the Building Information Modeling (BIM) method using Autodesk Revit in terms of cost-effectiveness. The case study was conducted on the Short Span II Pulau Balang Bridge Duplication Project in the Nusantara Capital City (IKN), Penajam Paser Utara Regency, East Kalimantan. The research objects include substructures (bore piles, pile caps, abutments, piers, and wing walls) and superstructures in the form of arch beams. The research method employs a quantitative approach by calculating concrete volumes conventionally using AutoCAD and Microsoft Excel, as well as calculating with BIM Autodesk Revit through three-dimensional modeling and Quantity Take-Off (QTO) exports. The results indicate that the BIM Autodesk Revit method generates a larger concrete volume compared to the conventional method, resulting in a higher total cost based on the BIM volume. The total cost for the conventional method amounted to IDR 142,613,245,996.12, while the BIM Autodesk Revit method amounted to IDR 143,127,208,186.60. These differences are influenced by the level of calculation detail, the simplification of shapes in the conventional method, and the precision of modeling in Autodesk Revit.
Downloads
References
Alfia Magfirona, Amar, T. I. K., & Abdul Aziz Muhammad Habib Failasufa. (2023). Analisis Komparasi Quantity Take Off Pekerjaan Struktur Berdasarkan Metode Konvensional Dan Metode BIM Studi Kasus : Perencanaan Omah DW. Jurnal TESLINK : Teknik Sipil Dan Lingkungan, 5(2), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.52005/teslink.v5i2.272
Anggaraini, N. L., Yuwana, A. Y. D. S., & Rafi’ud Darajat, A. (2022). Perbandingan Volume pada Pekerjaan Struktural antara Perhitungan dengan Building Information Modeling. Journal Review In Civil Engineering, 6(2), 78–84.
Anjani, A., Riakara Husni, H., & Niken, C. (2022). Penerapan Building Information Modeling (BIM) Menggunakan Software Autodesk Revit Pada Gedung 4 Rumah Sakit Pendidikan Peguruan Tinggi Negeri (RSPTN) Universitas Lampung. Jurnal Rekayasa Sipil Dan Desain, 10(1), 87–098.
Diharjo, T. S., & Sumarman. (2016). Analisis Manajemen KonstruksiPembangunanRuko GrandOrchardCirebon. CIREBON Jurnal Konstruksi, V(1), 2085–8744.
Diputra, G. A., Wiranata, A. A., & Kharisma, A. (2023). Perbandingan Bill of Quantity (BOQ) Antara Dokumen Kontrak Dengan Hasil Perhitungan Tekla Structures (Studi Kasus: Proyek Gedung Mall Di Pulau Jawa). Jurnal Spektran, 11(1), 55–61. http://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/jsn/
Fernando, R., Kusumo Friatmojo, E., Caesar Ricardo, K., Pengajar Prodi Teknik Konstruksi Bangunan Gedung, S., Pekerjaan Umum Jl Soedarto, P. H., & Tembalang Semarang, S. (2024). Perbandingan Quantity Takeoff Antara Metoda Konvensional Terhadap Metoda BIM 5D Cubicost pada Struktur Gedung Fasilitas Perkeretaapian Manggarai. 20(1), 25-34.
Haider, U., Khan, U., Nazir, A., & Humayon, M. (2020). Cost comparison of a building project by manual and BIM. Civil Engineering Journal (Iran), 6(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2020-03091451
Handrawan, E. H., Purnomo, A., & Berliana, R. (2024). Penggunaan Building Information Modelling (BIM) Studi Kasus: Siswa SMKN 4 Jakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 8(1), 2747–2753. https://www.jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/12800%0A
Juliani, M. P., & Renaningsih, R. (2023). Analisa Perbandingan Volume Beton Metode Konvensional pada Hasil Bill of Quantity (BQ) dan BIM Autodesk Revit 2020 terhadap Efektifitas Biaya. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknik Sipil UMS, 631–637.
Kementrian PUPR. (2019). Kementerian pekerjaan umum dan perumahan rakyat direktorat jenderal cipta karya 2019. Buku Saku Petunjuk Konstruksi Jembatan, 1–34.
Pesiwarissa, R. M., Siahaya, V. T., & Hukom, E. (2022). Analisis Rencana Anggaran Biaya Pada Penggantian Jembatan Wai-Wei Kabupaten Seram Bagian Barat. Jurnal Simetrik, 12(1), 549–552. https://doi.org/10.31959/js.v12i1.1065
Maulina, E. E., Wiryasuta, I. K. H., & Rodiyani, M. (2023). Perhitungan Quantity Take Off Pekerjaan Beton Pada Proyek X dengan Aplikasi Tekla Structures. 15(2), 1–11.
Sabol, L. A. (2018). Building information modeling. Technology for Facility Managers: The Impact of Cutting-Edge Technology on Facility Management, 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119572626.ch2
Saksena, H. T., & Sastrawiria, R. P. P. (2023). Implementation of Laser Scanning Technology for Digital Asset Management of Bridges in Indonesia: A Case Study of Pulau Balang Bridge in East Kalimantan. Asia Australia Road Conference, December, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.58674/phpji.v16i1.384
Tigauw, F. M., Aprilianto, F., & Santoso, H. T. (2023). Analisa Perhitungan Quantity Material Take-Off (QMTO) Struktur Bawah Jembatan Tipe Skew dengan Menggunakan BIM Autodesk Revit. Jurnal Inovasi Konstruksi, 2(2), 58–65. https://doi.org/10.56911/jik.v2i2.44
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Alkhansa Auliya Dzakiyyah, Lusiana Lusiana, Rafie Rafie

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

_001.jpg)




