Pertanggungjawaban Hukum atas Pencemaran Lingkungan Hidup Akibat Aktivitas Limbah Perusahaan melalui Mekanisme Gugatan Perwakilan Kelompok

Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 29/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Skh

Authors

  • Nazvia Alyssa Dwi Utami Universitas Sriwijaya
  • Amanda Amanda Universitas Sriwijaya
  • Moulyta Elgi Trinanda Universitas Sriwijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v5i3.8595

Keywords:

Class Action, Corporate Responsibility, Environmental Law, Environmental Pollution, Legal Liability

Abstract

Industrial development in Indonesia has significantly contributed to national economic growth; however, it also poses potential risks of environmental pollution when corporate waste management is not conducted properly. Environmental pollution resulting from corporate waste activities may cause harm to surrounding communities, including health problems, ecosystem degradation, as well as material and immaterial losses. In this context, the class action mechanism serves as a relevant legal instrument to collectively advocate for the rights of affected communities. This study aims to analyze the implementation of the class action mechanism in environmental pollution cases based on Decision Number 29/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Skh and to evaluate its effectiveness in providing legal protection and restoring the rights of affected communities. This research employs normative legal research using statute approach, case approach, and conceptual approach. The findings indicate that the class action mechanism in the aforementioned decision fulfilled the requirements of numerosity, commonality, typicality, and adequacy of representation as regulated under Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) Number 1 of 2002. Procedurally, the class action proved effective in enhancing access to justice, ensuring judicial efficiency, and strengthening the protection of the constitutional right to a good and healthy environment. However, its substantive effectiveness remains dependent on the fulfillment of formal requirements, the quality of evidence presented, and the consistent application of environmental law principles by judges. Therefore, the class action mechanism constitutes an important instrument in environmental law enforcement, yet it requires consistent regulatory support and judicial practice to achieve optimal ecological justice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anthony, V., & Putra, G. D. (2025). Pertanggungjawaban perdata perusahaan akibat pencemaran lingkungan: Analisis putusan class action (studi kasus PT Rayon Utama Makmur Nomor 29/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Skh). Jurnal Tana Mana. https://ojs.staialfurqan.ac.id/jtm/article/view/1018/655

Danialsyah, D., et al. (2023). Hukum acara perdata: Teori dan praktik. CV Sentosa Deli Mandiri.

Erlinawati., Manalu, N. Y. B. B., Rizki, C. I., & Danialsyah. (2025). Kedudukan gugatan class action dalam penyelesaian sengketa lingkungan secara perdata. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 3(4). https://ejournal.yayasanpendidikandzurriyatulquran.id/index.php/AlZayn/article/view/1897/1030

Jayadi, H. (2022). Hukum acara perdata. Publika Global Media.

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2002). Naskah akademis gugatan perwakilan kelompok (class action). Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI.

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (n.d.). Modul peserta program PPC terpadu peradilan umum: Hak gugat public (class action, legal standing, dan CLS). Badan Litbang Diklat Kumdil Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.

Majid, N. S. (2024). Penyelesaian sengketa lingkungan ditinjau dari hukum perdata melalui gugatan class action. Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu Akademik, 1(3), 263–268. https://doi.org/10.61722/jmia.v1i3.1414

Muhaimin. (2020). Metode penelitian hukum. Mataram University Press.

Nugroho, W. (2022). Hukum lingkungan dan pengelolaan sumber daya alam. Genta Publishing.

Pradnyana, D. P. W. J. (2025). Analisis komparatif perkembangan gugatan class action dalam perkara lingkungan di Indonesia, Australia, dan Amerika Serikat. Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 13(12), 2779–2800. https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2025.v13.i12.p05

Raksanagara, A. S. (2022). Hukum lingkungan. PT Global Eksekutif Teknologi.

Sastro, M. (2016). Hukum lingkungan: Partisipasi masyarakat dalam AMDAL. Universitas Malikussaleh.

Suyanto. (2022). Metode penelitian hukum: Pengantar penelitian normatif, empiris, dan gabungan. Unigres Press.

Widiarty, W. S. (2024). Metode penelitian hukum. Publika Global Media.

Widodo, W. (2023). Hukum lingkungan. Damera Press.

Collins, J. S. (2023, November 30). Explainer: Seperti apa gugatan class action di Indonesia? Indonesia Judicial Research Society.

Ni’am, S., & Setuningsih, N. (2025, January 31). Warga menang, MA hukum PT RUM bayar ganti rugi karena cemari lingkungan di Sukoharjo. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2025/01/31/20122701/warga-menang-ma-hukum-pt-rum-bayar-ganti-rugi-karena-cemari-lingkungan-di

Downloads

Published

2026-03-09

How to Cite

Nazvia Alyssa Dwi Utami, Amanda Amanda, & Moulyta Elgi Trinanda. (2026). Pertanggungjawaban Hukum atas Pencemaran Lingkungan Hidup Akibat Aktivitas Limbah Perusahaan melalui Mekanisme Gugatan Perwakilan Kelompok: Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 29/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Skh. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Humaniora, 5(3), 740–751. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v5i3.8595

Similar Articles

<< < 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.