Tinjauan Hukum terhadap Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata melalui Mediasi di Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v5i1.6803Keywords:
civil dispute, dispute resolution, empirical juridical, mediation, PERMA No. 1 of 2016Abstract
Mediation, as one of the alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms in civil cases, aims to provide efficient, timely, and non-confrontational solutions for disputing parties. Within the Indonesian legal system, mediation has been formally regulated through the Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) No. 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Court. This study seeks to examine the implementation of civil dispute resolution through mediation from a legal perspective while also assessing its empirical effectiveness in district courts. The research employs an empirical juridical approach, with data collected through in-depth interviews with mediator judges, advocates, and disputing parties who have participated in the mediation process, supported by documentation studies of civil case decisions resolved through mediation. The findings reveal that, normatively, mediation has a sufficiently strong legal foundation as an alternative method of dispute resolution. However, its practical effectiveness remains constrained by several challenges, such as the limited understanding and legal awareness of disputing parties, time constraints faced by mediator judges, and the absence of an optimal supervisory mechanism for monitoring mediation practices. These factors contribute to the relatively low success rate of mediation in practice. Therefore, improvements are required in the implementation of regulations, the establishment of more effective monitoring systems, and the enhancement of human resource capacity, particularly mediator competence. Strengthening these aspects is expected to enable mediation to function more effectively as a fair, efficient, and accessible mechanism for resolving civil disputes in Indonesia.
Downloads
References
Aikin, H. Z., Suhartana, L. W. P., & Sh, M. H. (2016). Pengantar hukum perusahaan. Kencana.
Aprianto, U. G. (2023). Rekonstruksi regulasi prosedur mediasi dalam penyelesaian perkara di peradilan agama berbasis nilai keadilan (Disertasi doktoral, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung).
Apriyanto, A., Haryanti, T., & Sari, L. (2024). Buku referensi hukum perdata: Teori dan praktik. PT Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
Astarini, D. R. S., & Sh, M. H. (2021). Mediasi pengadilan. Penerbit Alumni.
Azis, P., Kholid, M., & Nasrudin, N. (2024). Perbandingan lembaga penyelesaian sengketa: Litigasi dan non-litigasi. Qanuniya: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(2), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.15575/qanuniya.v1i2.896
Bush, R. A. B., & Folger, J. P. (2005). The promise of mediation: The transformative approach to conflict.
Coser, L. A. (1956). The functions of social conflict. Free Press.
Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1981). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. Penguin Books.
Hasudungan Sinaga, J., Timbul, J., Pondang, J., & Aifo, C. H. (2024). Membedah mediasi sebagai alternatif penyelesaian sengketa. Mega Press Nusantara.
Ibrahim, H. M. (2022). Implikasi perubahan perserikatan perdata menjadi persekutuan perdata bagi notaris berdasar Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris.
Jhering, R. von. (1877). Der Zweck im Recht [Tujuan dalam hukum]. (Terjemahan: Law as a means to an end).
Kelsen, H. (1934). Reine Rechtslehre [Teori hukum murni].
Kelsen, H. (1945). General theory of law and state. Harvard University Press.
Lempoi, G. (2020). Efektivitas mediasi dalam penyelesaian sengketa perdata antara para pihak di Pengadilan Negeri berdasarkan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2016. Lex Privatum, 8(1).
Nasruddin, N. (2019). Analisis implementasi mediasi perspektif hukum Islam dan Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang prosedur mediasi di pengadilan (Studi di Peradilan Agama Provinsi Lampung) (Disertasi doktoral). Pascasarjana Doctor.
Nugroho, S. A. (2019). Manfaat mediasi sebagai alternatif penyelesaian sengketa. Prenada Media.
Nugroho, W. A., Citranu, C., Amalia, M., Fitrianita, I., Thesia, E. H., Rohman, M. M., ... & Fitri, H. (2024). Sistem hukum & peradilan di Indonesia: Teori dan praktik. PT Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
Prastowo, O., & Darsono, S. H. (2020). Implementasi Perma No 1 Tahun 2016 tentang prosedur mediasi di Pengadilan Negeri Surakarta (Disertasi doktoral, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta).
Rahmadan, T. (2010). Mediasi penyelesaian sengketa melalui pendekatan mufakat.
Sutiyoso, B. (2016). Mediasi di pengadilan: Teori dan praktik. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Swantoro, H. (2016). Strategi dan teknik mediasi berdasarkan Perma No. 1 Tahun 2016 tentang prosedur mediasi di pengadilan. Brawijaya Law Journal, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.24239/blc.v11i2.308
Wajdi, F., Lubis, U. S., & Susanti, D. (2023). Hukum arbitrase dan alternatif penyelesaian sengketa bisnis: Dilengkapi arbitrase online dan arbitrase syariah. Sinar Grafika.
Winarta, F. H. (2022). Hukum penyelesaian sengketa arbitrase nasional Indonesia dan internasional (Edisi kedua). Sinar Grafika.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
