Pembantu Rumah Tangga dalam Perspektif Hukum Ketenagakerjaan: Analisis Yuridis Normatif
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v4i2.5855Keywords:
Domestic Workers, Labour Law, Normative Juridical AnalysisAbstract
Domestic helpers (DWs) play a vital role in sustaining household life in urban areas, yet their legal position in the Indonesian labour system remains marginal and vulnerable, without adequate legal protection. This research aims to analyse juridically normatively the legal position of domestic workers within the framework of national labour law and identify regulatory gaps and structural barriers that hinder the protection of their basic rights. Using a literature study method and a normative juridical approach, this research examines legislation, legal doctrine, and recent scientific literature. The analysis shows that Law No. 13 Year 2003 does not recognise domestic workers as formal workers, and Permenaker No. 2 Year 2015 is non-binding, creating a legal vacuum that results in vulnerability to exploitation, discrimination, and human rights violations. The absence of special regulations such as the PPRT Bill and the non-ratification of ILO Convention No. 189 exacerbate structural injustice against domestic workers. This research concludes that the legal protection of domestic workers is very weak normatively and practically, so regulative reform is needed through the enactment of special laws and harmonisation of national laws with international human rights standards in order to create a fair, inclusive and social justice-based employment system.
Downloads
References
Damayanti, S (2024). Relasi Kuasa dalam Sistem Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Genta Press.
Dewi, R. A (2021). Pekerja rumah tangga dan dinamika ekonomi domestik: Kajian peran sosial dan ekonomi PRT di Indonesia. Jakarta: Pustaka Nusantara.
Fatimah, N (2023). HAM dan Pekerja Rumah Tangga: Perspektif Keadilan Gender. Jurnal HAM dan Sosial.
Hamidah, N (2022). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap PRT dalam Perspektif Hukum Ketenagakerjaan. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 12(1), 45–60.
Harahap, S. & Siregar, M (2021). Analisis Yuridis terhadap Status Hukum PRT. Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan.
Haris, M. & Munandar, D (2021). Kesenjangan Perlindungan Hukum bagi PRT: Kajian terhadap UU No. 13 Tahun 2003. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 18(2), 101–115.
Kartika, A (2023). Pelajaran dari Filipina: Perlindungan Hukum bagi PRT. Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum.
Lestari, R., & Nugroho, B (2020). Kondisi Kerja dan Perlindungan Sosial PRT di Indonesia. Jurnal Kesejahteraan Sosial, 17(3), 207–220.
Lestari, Y (2021). Urgensi Pengesahan RUU PPRT. Jurnal Reformasi Hukum.
Marwiyah, L (2022). Problematika Perlindungan Pekerja Rumah Tangga di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Masyarakat.
Nurani, R (2020). Ketiadaan Perlindungan Hukum terhadap PRT dalam UU Ketenagakerjaan. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia.
Nurhasanah, I (2020). Diskriminasi Terselubung dalam Perlindungan Pekerja Rumah Tangga. Jurnal Hukum & Keadilan, 9(2), 133–150.
Rahayu, S. M (2022). Perlindungan hukum bagi pekerja rumah tangga: Menuju sistem ketenagakerjaan yang inklusif dan berkeadilan. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu
Rukmini, T (2021). Marginalisasi Pekerja Rumah Tangga dalam Sistem Ketenagakerjaan Nasional. Jakarta: Obor Indonesia.
Sari, D (2021). Pekerja Informal dan Ketidakadilan Sosial. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora
Simanjuntak, R (2020). Keadilan Distributif dalam Hukum Ketenagakerjaan. Jurnal Keadilan Sosial.
Siregar, Y (2023). Efektivitas Regulasi Non-Legislatif dalam Perlindungan PRT. Jurnal Hukum dan Masyarakat, 15(1), 87–102.
Sutrisno, B (2020). Perbandingan Perlindungan PRT di Beberapa Negara. Jurnal Internasionalisasi Hukum.
Wahyuni, T (2022). RUU PPRT: Tinjauan Kritis Terhadap Proses Legislasi. Jurnal Demokrasi dan Hukum.
Yuliani, A., & Prakoso, M (2021). Kritik terhadap Ketidakratifikasian Konvensi ILO 189 oleh Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Internasional, 8(2), 55–70.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
