Perlindungan Rahasia Dagang dalam Kerangka Haki: Studi Komparatif Indonesia dan Malaysia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v4i1.5521Keywords:
trade secrets, intellectual property rights, legal protection, Indonesia, Malaysia, comparative studyAbstract
This study examines the protection of trade secrets in the framework of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) by conducting a comparative study between Indonesia and Malaysia. Trade secrets are a form of intellectual property that has significant economic value for business actors but often receives inadequate attention compared to other forms of IPR. This research focuses on two main problems: first, the comparison of the legal framework for the protection of trade secrets in Indonesia and Malaysia in the context of Intellectual Property Rights; and second, the role of IPR-related institutions in both countries in providing protection for trade secrets. The research method used is normative legal research with a comparative approach and a statute approach. The data used are in the form of primary legal materials in the form of laws and regulations related to IPR in Indonesia and Malaysia, as well as secondary legal materials in the form of literature and scientific journals. The results of the study show that there are significant differences in the legal framework for the protection of trade secrets between Indonesia, which adopts a civil law system with special codification through Law No. 30 of 2000, and Malaysia, which applies a common law approach with a combination of court precedents and statutory law. In addition, there are differences in the roles and functions of IPR-related institutions in the two countries in providing protection for trade secrets, especially in terms of registration, law enforcement, and dispute resolution. The study concludes that despite differences in approaches, both Indonesia and Malaysia recognize the importance of trade secret protection within the framework of IPR, with Malaysia tending to have a more comprehensive protection system based on common law practices. Based on the findings of the study, it is recommended that Indonesia can adopt some positive aspects of Malaysia's trade secrets protection system, especially in terms of harmonizing the role of relevant institutions and strengthening law enforcement mechanisms.
Downloads
References
ASEAN Intellectual Property Association. (2022). Annual report on IP enforcement in ASEAN region 2022. Singapore: AIPA.
ASEAN Secretariat. (2016). ASEAN intellectual property rights action plan 2016–2025. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.
Aziz, A. (2022). Trade secret protection under Malaysian common law: Judicial trends and comparative perspectives. Malaysian Journal of Law and Society, 14, 41–50.
Azmi, I. M. A. G. (2019a). The protection of trade secrets in Malaysia. Journal of Malaysian and Comparative Law, 36(1), 1–24.
Azmi, I. M. A. G. (2019b). Trade secret protection in Malaysia: Issues and challenges. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 14(S1), S77–S95. https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2019.20
Bone, R. G. (2019). A new look at trade secret law: Doctrine in search of justification. California Law Review, 86(2), 241–313.
Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual. (2021). Laporan tahunan DJKI 2021. Jakarta: Kementerian Hukum dan HAM RI.
DJKI. (2024). Laporan tahunan Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual 2023. Jakarta: Kemenkumham RI.
Dwinanto, A. (2021). Perlindungan hukum rahasia dagang dan kendala penegakannya di Indonesia. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 18(3), 235–243.
Hanafiah, M. (2023). NDA sebagai instrumen perlindungan rahasia dagang: Studi perbandingan Indonesia–Malaysia. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis dan Teknologi, 7(2), 99–110.
Intellectual Property Corporation of Malaysia. (2021). Strategic plan 2021–2025. Kuala Lumpur: MyIPO.
Lemley, M. A. (2018). The surprising virtues of treating trade secrets as IP rights. Stanford Law Review, 61(2), 311–353.
Lim, H. (2023). Specialized IP courts in Malaysia: Their role in trade secret dispute resolution. Asian Intellectual Property Review, 18(1), 35–48.
Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Penelitian hukum (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2018). Analisis data kualitatif (Tj. R. Rohidi, Trans.). Jakarta: UI Press.
MyIPO. (2023). Annual report 2022. Intellectual Property Corporation of Malaysia.
Nasution, M. (2022). Implementasi doktrin springboard dalam hukum rahasia dagang. Jurnal Ius Quia Iustum, 29(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol29.iss2.art2
Pasal 1 angka 1 Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2000 tentang Rahasia Dagang.
Pooley, J. (2020). Trade secrets: The other IP right. WIPO Magazine, June, 12–15.
Rahman, A. (2020). Urgensi pembentukan peradilan khusus HAKI di Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi dan Hukum Nasional, 5(1), 55–66.
Ramadhani, N. (2023). Penguatan perlindungan hukum rahasia dagang melalui optimalisasi lembaga dan prosedur peradilan. Jurnal Ius Quia Iustum, 30(1), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol30.iss1.art5
Safitri, L. (2021). Kesenjangan perlindungan rahasia dagang di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 13(2), 123–134.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2019). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sunggono, B. (2020). Metodologi penelitian hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Syafrina, R., & Sari, Y. (2020). Perlindungan rahasia dagang dalam perspektif perbandingan hukum: Studi kasus Indonesia dan Malaysia. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan Ekonomi, 9(1), 77–85.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 30 Tahun 2000 tentang Rahasia Dagang.
World Intellectual Property Organization. (2023). Global innovation index 2023. Geneva: WIPO.
World Trade Organization. (1994). Agreement on trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights. Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1C.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
