Komisi Etik Penelitian di Perguruan Tinggi: Membangun Budaya Riset yang Bertanggung Jawab dan Berintegritas

Authors

  • Getut Pramesti Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta
  • Sri Mulyani Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta
  • Yusfia Hafid Aristyagama Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta
  • Dewi Gunawati Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jurripen.v4i2.5566

Keywords:

Research culture, Research ethics committee, Research integrity

Abstract

This study critically examines the pivotal role of the Research Ethics Commission (KEP) in fostering a research culture grounded in responsibility and integrity within higher education institutions. Employing a mixed-methods design, the research integrates both quantitative and qualitative approaches. The quantitative phase utilizes a pre-post experimental design to assess the impact of KEP reviewer training on the knowledge enhancement of prospective reviewers at the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education. Data were gathered via structured questionnaires administered before and after the intervention, with statistical analysis conducted using paired t-tests, revealing significant improvements in reviewer comprehension (p < 0.01). Complementing this, the qualitative component involves a comprehensive literature review that elucidates the critical function of KEP in upholding ethical standards and research quality in academia. Findings from the literature reinforce KEP’s essential status as a cornerstone in cultivating an ethical and accountable research environment. The study highlights the importance of systematic reviewer training and robust policy enforcement within KEP to ensure the integrity and transparency of scholarly research in higher education settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2013). Principles of biomedical ethics (7th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Cahyanto, E., Sudarmadji, U., Tri, M., Wulandari, P., Nurrohima, D., & Nofia, Y. (2022). Transisi layanan kaji etik penelitian di era digital. Jurnal Kebidanan, 14(2), 136–144. https://doi.org/10.35872/jurkeb.v14i02.531

Depdiknas. (2012). Pedoman etik penelitian di perguruan tinggi. Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia.

Emanuel, E. J., Wendler, D., & Grady, C. (2000). What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA, 283(20), 2701–2711. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.20.2701

Kementerian Riset dan Teknologi/Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional. (2020). Pedoman etik penelitian di Indonesia. https://www.ristekbrin.go.id/pedoman-etik-penelitian/

Komisi Etik Nasional. (2019). Laporan tahunan Komisi Etik Nasional. KEN.

Mertens, D. M. (2014). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Pusat Pengurusan Penyelidikan dan Inovasi, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. (2025). Research ethics management. https://rmic.upsi.edu.my/research-ethics-management/

Siregar, E., & Harahap, A. (2019). Peran komisi etik penelitian dalam menjamin mutu dan etika penelitian di perguruan tinggi. Jurnal Etika Penelitian, 5(2), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jetika.v5i2.1234

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Suryani, N., & Kurniawan, D. (2018). Etika penelitian pendidikan: Peran komisi etik dalam meningkatkan mutu penelitian di perguruan tinggi. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Etika, 3(1), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpe.v3i1.5678

Susilawati, T. N., dkk. (2021). SOP (Standard Operating Procedure) Komite Etik Penelitian Fakultas Kedokteran UNS. UNS Press.

Susilawati, T. N., dkk. (2024). Analisis faktor-faktor yang menghambat kaji protokol penelitian: Studi pada komite etik penelitian Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Sebelas Maret. Media Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan, 34(2), 654–662. https://doi.org/10.34011/jmp2k.v34i3.2084

Wardani, S., & Prasetyo, Y. (2021). Penguatan komisi etik penelitian dalam penelitian pendidikan di perguruan tinggi negeri. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 12(2), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.2345/jpp.v12i2.9876

World Health Organization. (2011). Standards and operational guidance for ethics review of health-related research with human participants. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44783

Downloads

Published

2025-06-20

How to Cite

Getut Pramesti, Sri Mulyani, Yusfia Hafid Aristyagama, & Dewi Gunawati. (2025). Komisi Etik Penelitian di Perguruan Tinggi: Membangun Budaya Riset yang Bertanggung Jawab dan Berintegritas. JURNAL RISET RUMPUN ILMU PENDIDIKAN, 4(2), 438–447. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurripen.v4i2.5566

Similar Articles

<< < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.