Epistimologi Barat Modern

Dominasi, Kritik, dan Implikasi dalam Diskursus Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Pembangunan

Authors

  • Pamuji Pamuji Universitas Islam An Nur Lampung
  • Azmy Abdurrahman Universitas Islam An Nur Lampung
  • Ahmad Jaelani Universitas Islam An Nur Lampung
  • Al Anshor Universitas Islam An Nur Lampung
  • Setiyorini Setiyorini Universitas Islam An Nur Lampung
  • Jusni Silalahi Universitas Islam An Nur Lampung
  • Rina Setyaningsih Universitas Islam An Nur Lampung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jurripen.v4i1.5279

Keywords:

Epistemology, Western-Hegemony, Modernity, Development-Discourse

Abstract

This article explores a critical perspective on epistemology that has long been influenced by Western-centric biases, aiming to uncover its inherent discriminatory aspects. Employing a literature-based approach, the discussion centers on two primary concerns. First, the exclusionary nature of Western epistemology is inseparable from the ideals of modernity, which emphasize progress and innovation. These characteristics often marginalize alternative knowledge systems rooted in traditional or indigenous communities. Second, the discourse of development operates as a mechanism to perpetuate Western epistemological dominance, serving as a justification to reassert control over nations in the Global South or former colonies. The article concludes by emphasizing the importance of fostering a critical mindset among scholars, encouraging openness to diverse epistemological frameworks that reflect local contexts, without entirely dismissing the scientific traditions of the West.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alcoff, L., & Potter, E. (1993). Feminist epistemologies. Routledge.

Amin, S. (1990). Delinking: Towards a polycentric world. Zed Books.

Amin, S. (2009). Eurocentrism. Monthly Review Press.

Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.

Delanty, G. (2013). Formations of European modernity. Routledge.

Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development. Princeton University Press.

Hardiman, B. (2003). Kritik ideologi. Kanisius.

Hardiman, B. (2007). Filsafat modern. Kanisius.

Harding, S. (1998). Is science multicultural? Indiana University Press.

Harding, S. (2006). Science and social inequality. University of Illinois Press.

Harding, S. (2008). Sciences from below. Duke University Press.

Latour, B. (1991). We have never been modern. Harvard University Press.

Leavy, P. (2017). Research design. Guilford Press.

McQueen, R. A., & McQueen, D. R. (2010). Research methods for social science. Prentice Hall.

Sachs, W. (Ed.). (1992). The development dictionary. Zed Books.

Schwartz-Shea, P., & Yanow, D. (2012). Interpretive research design. Routledge.

Shiva, V. (1988). Staying alive. Zed Books.

Sudarminta, J. (2002). Epistemologi: Filsafat pengetahuan. Kanisius.

Watloly, A. (2013). Pengantar filsafat ilmu. Pustaka Setia.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-30

How to Cite

Pamuji Pamuji, Azmy Abdurrahman, Ahmad Jaelani, Al Anshor, Setiyorini Setiyorini, Jusni Silalahi, & Rina Setyaningsih. (2025). Epistimologi Barat Modern: Dominasi, Kritik, dan Implikasi dalam Diskursus Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Pembangunan. JURNAL RISET RUMPUN ILMU PENDIDIKAN, 4(1), 687–692. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurripen.v4i1.5279

Similar Articles

<< < 6 7 8 9 10 11 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.