Implementasi Metode AHP-TOPSIS untuk Keputusan Pembelian Kamera di Perusahaan Jasa Fotografi dan Videografi ASSAD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrie.v4i1.4501Keywords:
Camera Selection, AHP, TOPSIS, Photography, Videography, Purchase DecisionAbstract
This study examines the selection of the optimal camera for the photography and videography service company Assad ID using a combination of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The rapid development of the photography industry makes choosing the right camera a crucial factor in improving the quality of service. The weighting of criteria using AHP is based on the evaluation of photography and videography experts, including technical specifications, functional features, economic aspects, comfort, and supporting services. The TOPSIS method is applied to the ranking of five alternative cameras (Sony A7 III, Canon EOS R6, Nikon Z6 II, Panasonic Lumix S5, and Fujifilm X-T4). The results of the study show that technical specifications and functionality features have the highest weight. Sony A7 III ranked first with a preference value of 0.610, followed by Canon EOS R6 (0.581), Fujifilm X-T4 (0.472), Nikon Z6 II (0.401), and Panasonic Lumix S5 (0.368). This study proves the effectiveness of the AHP-TOPSIS method in making optimal camera purchase decisions and can be a reference for similar companies in determining the investment of photography and videography equipment according to operational needs
Downloads
References
Rivaldi, D., Pulansari, F., & Kartika, A. P. (2023). Analisis pemilihan supplier baut menggunakan metode AHP-TOPSIS PT. Stechoq Robotika Indonesia. Jurnal Sistem dan Manajemen Industri, 1(1), 12-18.
Ikhsan, R. M., Andryana, S., & Andrianingsih, A. (2021). Implementasi metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) dan TOPSIS untuk pemilihan kamera. Jurnal Teknik Informatika dan Sistem Informasi, 8(1), 401-420. https://doi.org/10.30988/jmil.v6i1.952
Ridho, M. R., Hairani, H., Abd Latif, K., & Hammad, R. (2020). Kombinasi metode AHP dan TOPSIS untuk rekomendasi penerima beasiswa SMK berbasis sistem pendukung keputusan. Jurnal TEKNO KOMPAK, 15(1), 26-39.
Sukwadi, R., Yang, C.-C., & Benny. (2014). Integrasi Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS dalam evaluasi kualitas layanan elektronik rumah sakit. Jurnal Teknik Industri, 16(1), 25-32.
Ramayanti, G., & Ulum, H. (2017). Sistem penentuan supplier kawat las dengan metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) dan Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). Jurnal Sistem dan Manajemen Industri, 1(1), 12-18.
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
Bertalanffy, L. V. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York: George Braziller.
Bhushan, N., & Rai, K. (2004). Strategic decision making: applying the analytic hierarchy process. London: Springer-Verlag.
Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Kahraman, C., Onar, S. C., & Oztaysi, B. (2015). Fuzzy multicriteria decision-making: A literature review. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 8(4), 637-666.
Mulliner, E., Malys, N., & Maliene, V. (2016). Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability. Omega, 59, 146-156.
Rahmat, P. A. F., Firdaus, M. Z., & Widyastuti, M. (2022). Integrating AHP and TOPSIS for technology product selection: A comparative analysis. Journal of Decision Systems, 31(3), 278-295.
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83-98.
Simon, H. A. (1960). The new science of management decision. New York: Harper & Row.
Tavana, M., & Hatami-Marbini, A. (2011). A group AHP-TOPSIS framework for human spaceflight mission planning at NASA. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(11), 13588-13603.
Vaidya, O. S., & Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 1-29.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
Wu, W., Kou, G., & Peng, Y. (2016). Group decision-making using improved multi-criteria decision making methods for credit risk analysis. Filomat, 30(15), 4135-4150.
Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Kildienė, S. (2014). State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 20(1), 165-17
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Ekonomi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
