Etika Kecerdasan Buatan dalam Perspektif Teologi Kristen: Implikasi bagi Pendidikan Agama di Era Society 5.0

(Studi pada Mahasiswa Teologi)

Authors

  • Tri Subekti STT Kerusso Indonesia
  • Pujiwati Pujiwati STT Kerusso Indonesia
  • Indriati Tjipto Purnomo STT Kerusso Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrafi.v5i2.8736

Keywords:

Academic Integrity, Ai Ethics, Generative Artificial Intelligence, Imago Dei, Theological Education

Abstract

This study examines the use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) among theology students and its ethical and theological implications for theological education in the Society 5.0 era. Employing a light mixed-methods sequential explanatory design, the research involved theology students through surveys and semi-structured interviews. The findings indicate that GenAI is primarily utilized as a learning support tool for understanding course materials and developing academic assignments. While students demonstrate awareness of potential bias and ethical concerns, consistent transparency and critical reflection in AI usage remain limited. The theological concept of imago Dei emerges as a significant analytical lens, emphasizing human dignity and moral responsibility in academic practices. The study concludes that GenAI can constructively support theological education when integrated with faith-based ethical literacy and clear institutional guidelines.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed, S., Awan, D., Adil, M., & Ahmad, A. (2025). Ethics and transparency in AI, transparency, and accountability in higher education. Social Science Review Archives, 3(4), 2729–2741.

Alfaleh, M. (2026). Sustainable AI-driven assessment in higher education: A systematic review of fairness, transparency, pedagogical innovation, and governance. Sustainability, 18(2), 785.

Aswan, D. (2025). Hubungan antara literasi digital dan persepsi mahasiswa tentang etika penggunaan AI di kalangan akademik. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 11(6), 283–294.

Ataupah, N., Lulu, M. C. U., Dianita, H., Folrati, M. P., Leo, C., & Wijaya, R. P. C. (2025). Integrasi AI generatif dalam kehidupan akademik mahasiswa di Kota Kupang. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan Indonesia, 2(6), 420–435.

Beard, B. A. (2024). Artificial intelligence and theology: A bibliographic essay. Theological Librarianship, 17(2), 31–42.

Bittle, K., & El-Gayar, O. (2025). Generative AI and academic integrity in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda. Information, 16(4), 296.

Chavan, J., Mankar, C., & Patil, V. (2024). Opportunities in research for generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), challenges and future direction: A study. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 11(2), 446–451.

Chukwuma, V. P. (2022). The role of Christian education in building skills and instilling moral values among students in higher education institutions for national unity and economic advancement in Sub-Saharan Africa. OKH Journal: Anthropological Ethnography and Analysis Through the Eyes of Christian Faith, 6(1).

Kosasih, I. (2025). Peran teknologi digital di era teologi modern. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan, 4(2), 10770–10775.

Mawikere, M. C. S., & Hura, S. (2025). The theology of spirituality of the Christian teacher for the effectiveness of their ministry. Imitatio Christo: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Agama Kristen, 1(1), 93–110.

Nasoha, A. M. M., Pramudiansyah, G. I. B., Pradana, A., Syafei, F. I., & Al Hasani, M. N. (2025). Peran pendidikan kewarganegaraan dalam membentuk AI literacy dan etika digital mahasiswa di era artificial intelligence. LITERA: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 2(5), 709–717.

Oviedo, L. (2022). Artificial intelligence and theology: Looking for a positive—but not uncritical—reception. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science, 57(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12832

Papakostas, C. (2025). Artificial intelligence in religious education: Ethical, pedagogical, and theological perspectives. Religions, 16(5), 563.

Patibang, O. I., Kalista, Y. P., & Midian, C. (2025). Citra manusia dalam teologi Kristen: Sebuah tinjauan humanis terhadap Imago Dei. HUMANITIS: Jurnal Humaniora, Sosial dan Bisnis, 3(1), 188–199.

Prihatni, Y., Septiani, D., & Erlangga, S. Y. (2025). Deepfake learning dan transformasi pendidikan IPA SMP: Pendekatan fenomenologi hermeneutik untuk mitigasi risiko, penguatan ketahanan digital, dan integrasi ajaran Tamansiswa. Dunia Penerbitan Buku.

Purwoto, H. (2025). Transformasi kepribadian melalui augmentasi teknologi: Perspektif Imago Dei. Jurnal Teologi Cultivation, 9(2), 425–451.

Pyae, A. (2025). What is human-centeredness in human-centered AI? Development of human-centeredness framework and AI practitioners’ perspectives. arXiv Preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.03293

Sengar, S. S., Hasan, A. B., Kumar, S., & Carroll, F. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence: A systematic review and applications. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 84(21), 23661–23700.

Silaban, P., Silaban, S. E., & Hutabarat, L. (2026). Membangun budaya akademik berbasis AI-etika: Gagasan sistem pembinaan integritas digital di perguruan tinggi. Bhakti Bhinneka: Jurnal Bina Harmoni dan Karya untuk Transformasi, 2(1), 34–46.

UNESCO. (2023). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. UNESCO.

Wajib, M., Majid, I. N., Hamdiana, S. P., Mawardi, A. K., & Or, M. (2026). Pedoman etis dan akademik pemanfaatan kecerdasan buatan (AI) bagi mahasiswa. Kramantara JS.

Wang, P., Jing, Y., & Shen, S. (2025). A systematic literature review on the application of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) in teaching within higher education: Instructional contexts, process, and strategies. The Internet and Higher Education, 65, 100996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.100996

Downloads

Published

2026-05-06

How to Cite

Tri Subekti, Pujiwati Pujiwati, & Indriati Tjipto Purnomo. (2026). Etika Kecerdasan Buatan dalam Perspektif Teologi Kristen: Implikasi bagi Pendidikan Agama di Era Society 5.0 : (Studi pada Mahasiswa Teologi). Jurnal Riset Rumpun Agama Dan Filsafat, 5(2), 215–227. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrafi.v5i2.8736