The Estetika Hiperbola dan Surealisme dalam Fotografi Komersial

Studi Kasus Digital Imaging Studio Tandaseru

Authors

  • Abdul Hakim Santoso Universitas Trilogi
  • Subadi Subadi Institut Kesenian Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrsendem.v5i2.9888

Keywords:

Commercial Photography, Digital Imaging, Hyperbolic Aesthetics, Surrealism, Visual Communication

Abstract

Digital Imaging has shifted commercial photography from a recording practice to a controlled process of constructing persuasive visual realities. This study analyzes hyperbolic and surreal aesthetics in the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE campaign produced by Studio Tandaseru and explains how three-dimensional environments, photography, and digital compositing translate product claims into visual experience. A descriptive qualitative approach with a single-case-study design was applied to four publicly available visual artifacts consisting of two three-dimensional clay renders and two final composites. The artifacts were examined through Feldman’s stages of description, formal analysis, interpretation, and evaluation, supported by cross-artifact comparison and relevant visual-media literature. The findings show that Digital Imaging operates through three connected layers: virtual-space construction, photographic and CGI integration, and communicative signification. Hyperbole appears through scale emphasis, idealized lighting, controlled space, and impossible spatial events, while surrealism emerges from the seamless coexistence of physical subjects and synthetic elements. These operations form synthetic realism that converts abstract claims about performance and artificial intelligence into accessible, emotionally persuasive scenes. The study positions Digital Imaging as a strategic visual-communication method rather than a post-production technique and offers an analytical framework for evaluating contemporary commercial imagery.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Appel, G., Grewal, L., Hadi, R., & Stephen, A. T. (2020). The future of social media in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48, 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00695-1

Arsenyan, J., & Mirowska, A. (2021). Almost human? A comparative case study on the social media presence of virtual influencers. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 155, 102694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102694

Banh, L., & Strobel, G. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence. Electronic Markets, 33, Article 63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-023-00680-1

Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation (S. F. Glaser, Trans.). University of Michigan Press. (Original work published 1981). https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.9904

Breton, A. (1969). Manifestoes of surrealism (R. Seaver & H. R. Lane, Trans.). University of Michigan Press. (Original work published 1924). https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.7558

Campbell, C., Plangger, K., Sands, S., & Kietzmann, J. H. (2022). Preparing for an era of deepfakes and AI-generated ads: A framework for understanding responses to manipulated advertising. Journal of Advertising, 51(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2021.1909515

Cetinic, E., & She, J. (2022). Understanding and creating art with AI: Review and outlook. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications, 18(2), Article 66. https://doi.org/10.1145/3475799

Conti, M., Gathani, J., & Tricomi, P. (2022). Virtual influencers in online social media. IEEE Communications Magazine, 60(8), 86–91. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.001.2100786

Dobber, T., Metoui, N., Trilling, D., Helberger, N., & de Vreese, C. (2021). Do (microtargeted) deepfakes have real effects on political attitudes? The International Journal of Press/Politics, 26(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220944364

Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., ... Wright, R. (2023). "So what if ChatGPT wrote it?" Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642

Epstein, Z., Hertzmann, A., Herman, L., Mahari, R., Frank, M. R., Groh, M., ... Russakovsky, O. (2023). Art and the science of generative AI. Science, 380(6650), 1110–1111. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh4451

Epstein, Z., Levine, S., Rand, D. G., & Rahwan, I. (2020). Who gets credit for AI-generated art? iScience, 23(9), 101515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2020.101515

Feldman, E. B. (1967). Art as image and idea. Prentice-Hall.

Genesius, G., Bratayadnya, P. A., & Candrayana, I. B. (2025). Karakteristik portrait fotografi editorial dalam teknik digital imaging. Retina: Jurnal Fotografi, 5(2), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.59997/rjf.v5i2.5277

Groh, M., Epstein, Z., Firestone, C., & Picard, R. (2022). Deepfake detection by human crowds, machines, and machine-informed crowds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(1), e2110013119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2110013119

Hancock, J. T., & Bailenson, J. N. (2021). The social impact of deepfakes. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 24(3), 149–152. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2021.29208.editorial

Hertzmann, A. (2020). Visual indeterminacy in GAN art. Leonardo, 53(4), 424–428. https://doi.org/10.1162/leon_a_01930

Juefei-Xu, F., Wang, R., Huang, Y., Guo, Q., Ma, L., & Liu, Y. (2022). Countering malicious deepfakes: Survey, battleground, and horizon. International Journal of Computer Vision, 130, 1678–1734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-022-01606-0

Kietzmann, J., Lee, L. W., McCarthy, I. P., & Kietzmann, T. C. (2020). Deepfakes: Trick or treat? Business Horizons, 63(2), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.11.006

Kim, E. A., Kim, D., E, Z., & Shoenberger, H. (2023). The next hype in social media advertising: Examining virtual influencers' brand endorsement effectiveness. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1089051. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1089051

Mirsky, Y., & Lee, W. (2021). The creation and detection of deepfakes: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(1), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3425780

Moustakas, E., Lamba, N., Mahmoud, D., & Ranganathan, C. (2020). Blurring lines between fiction and reality: Perspectives of experts on marketing effectiveness of virtual influencers. International Journal of Information Management, 54, 102199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102199

Nguyen, T. T., Nguyen, Q. V. H., Nguyen, D. T., Nguyen, D. T., Huynh-The, T., Nahavandi, S., ... Pham, Q.-V. (2022). Deep learning for deepfakes creation and detection: A survey. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 223, 103525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cviu.2022.103525

Nightingale, S. J., & Farid, H. (2022). AI-synthesized faces are indistinguishable from real faces and more trustworthy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(8), e2120481119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2120481119

Ragot, M., Martin, N., & Cojean, S. (2020). AI-generated vs. human artworks: A perception bias towards artificial intelligence? Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3382892

Sands, S., Ferraro, C., Demsar, V., & Chandler, G. (2022). False idols: Unpacking the opportunities and challenges of falsity in the context of virtual influencers. Business Horizons, 65(6), 777–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2022.08.002

Shin, D. (2021). The effects of explainability and causability on perception, trust, and acceptance: Implications for explainable AI. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 146, 102551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102551

Stein, J.-P., Breves, P. L., & Anders, N. (2022). Parasocial interactions with real and virtual influencers: The role of perceived similarity and human-likeness. New Media & Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221102900

Thomas, V. L., & Fowler, K. (2021). Close encounters of the AI kind: Use of AI influencers as brand endorsers. Journal of Advertising, 50(1), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2020.1810595

Tolosana, R., Vera-Rodriguez, R., Fierrez, J., Morales, A., & Ortega-Garcia, J. (2020). Deepfakes and beyond: A survey of face manipulation and fake detection. Information Fusion, 64, 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2020.06.014

Vaccari, C., & Chadwick, A. (2020). Deepfakes and disinformation: Exploring the impact of synthetic political video on deception, uncertainty, and trust in news. Social Media + Society, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120903408

Verdoliva, L. (2020). Media forensics and deepfakes: An overview. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 14(5), 910–932. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTSP.2020.3002101

Wells, L. (Ed.). (2015). Photography: A critical introduction (5th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315727370

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Published

2026-07-24

How to Cite

Abdul Hakim Santoso, & Subadi Subadi. (2026). The Estetika Hiperbola dan Surealisme dalam Fotografi Komersial: Studi Kasus Digital Imaging Studio Tandaseru. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Seni, Desain Dan Media, 5(2), 466–479. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrsendem.v5i2.9888