Emojurnalism dalam Ekosistem Media Digital

Authors

  • Desiana Desiana Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Mandailing Natal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrsendem.v4i1.4425

Keywords:

Digital Media, Emoji, Emojournalism, Emotional Communication, Journalism Ethics

Abstract

The digital transformation of journalism has reshaped how news is communicated and consumed. In an ecosystem dominated by visual content and rapid engagement, emoji have emerged as essential tools for conveying emotional tone, shaping narratives, and enhancing audience interaction. This phenomenon is referred to as emojournalism, the use of emoji within journalistic content to foster emotional resonance and public engagement. This study employs a qualitative approach with a constructivist paradigm and phenomenological strategy. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, netnographic observation, and content analysis of online news shared on platforms like Instagram and Twitter. The analysis utilized Roland Barthes’ semiotic framework, supported by triangulation techniques to ensure data validity. Emoji function as emotional signifiers in news content, influencing audience interpretation and increasing digital interaction. Specific emojis—such as

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bailey, R. (2018). When journalism and satire merge: The implications for impartiality, engagement and ‘post-truth’ politics – A UK perspective on the serious side of US TV comedy. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 200–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760322

Basu, L. (2018). News satire: Giving the news a memory. TripleC, 16(1), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.31269/vol16iss1pp241-255

Bird, D. (2023). Democratic listening: News podcasts, trust and political participation in Australia. Australian Journalism Review, 45(1), 93–113. https://doi.org/10.1386/ajr_00120_7

Breese, E. B. (2010). Reports from “Backstage” in entertainment news. Society, 47(5), 396–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-010-9350-2

Comfort, S. E., & Blankenship, J. (2021). Curated journalism: A field theory approach to journalistic production by environmental non-governmental organizations. Journalism, 22(2), 501–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918786402

Gallagher, C. (2022). How “cocooning” as a public health measure was reported during the Covid-19 crisis. Administration, 70(3), 33–57. https://doi.org/10.2478/admin-2022-0018

Goyvaerts, J., Hendrickx, J., Vis, S., Picone, I., & De Cleen, B. (2024). Media (De)concentration and editorial cross-media self-promotion: Evidence from Flanders. Journalism Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2024.2340534

Guallar, J., Franch, P., Cascón-Katchadourian, J., & Boté-Vericad, J.-J. (2025). The rise of curated newsletters in media: A case study of the New York Times. Journalism Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2025.2457332

Haim, M., Karlsson, M., Ferrer-Conill, R., Kammer, A., Elgesem, D., & Sjøvaag, H. (2021). You should read this study! It investigates Scandinavian social media logics ☝. Digital Journalism, 9(4), 406–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1886861

Harkins, S., & Lugo-Ocando, J. (2025). The view from ‘My Pitch’: Homeless voices in The Big Issue during the cost-of-living crisis. Discourse and Society, 36(3), 350–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265241287871

Harlow, S. (2022). Journalism’s change agents: Black Lives Matter, #BlackoutTuesday, and a shift toward activist doxa. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 99(3), 742–762. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990221108648

Hendrickx, J. (2025). News #foryou on TikTok: A digital methods-based study. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990251328623

Hermida, A. (2015). Power plays on social media. Social Media and Society, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115580340

Hoak, G. (2025). Virtually prepared: Using virtual reality to build trauma awareness and resilience in journalism students. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776958241312967

Jakobsson, P., & Stiernstedt, F. (2024). Media resentment. European Journal of Communication, 39(3), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231241228961

Johnson, K. A., & St. John III, B. (2021). Transparency in the news: The impact of self-disclosure and process disclosure on the perceived credibility of the journalist, the story, and the organization. Journalism Studies, 22(7), 953–970. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1910542

Juarez Miro, C. (2025). “Everything is biased”: Populist supporters’ folk theories of journalism. International Journal of Press/Politics, 30(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612231197617

Koivunen, A., Kanner, A., Janicki, M., Harju, A., Hokkanen, J., & Mäkelä, E. (2021). Emotive, evaluative, epistemic: A linguistic analysis of affectivity in news journalism. Journalism, 22(5), 1190–1206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920985724

Kusal, S., Patil, S., & Kotecha, K. (2025). Multimodal text-emoji fusion using deep neural networks for text-based emotion detection in online communication. Journal of Big Data, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-025-01062-4

Lewis, S. C., Hermida, A., & Lorenzo, S. (2024). Jobs-to-be-done and journalism innovation: Making news more responsive to community needs. Media and Communication, 12. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.7578

Löhmann, K., & Hanusch, F. (2024). Emotional dimensions of the adoption of audience analytics: Results from a survey of Austrian journalists. Journalism Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2024.2340520

Lyons, S., & Lidberg, J. (2024). When the public does not trust science: What can journalists do about it? Australian Journalism Review, 46(2), 249–269. https://doi.org/10.1386/ajr_00165_1

Macnamara, J. (2014). Journalism-PR relations revisited: The good news, the bad news, and insights into tomorrow’s news. Public Relations Review, 40(5), 739–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.07.002

Miles, C. M. (2025). “It’s chaos”: Affective spaces of journalism in Istanbul. Journal of Communication, 75(1), 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqae035

Netter, L., & Sykes, T. (2024). ‘Whose story is it, anyway?’: Perception, representation, and identity in textual and visual reportage of English seaside towns. Social Identities, 30(1), 50–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2023.2264817

Oak, A., & Petrov, J. (2020). Makeover media as fashion journalism: What Not To Wear, fashion, authority, and Gonzo subjectivity. Popular Communication, 18(4), 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2020.1839079

Ozawa, J. V. S., Lukito, J., Lee, T., Varma, A., & Alves, R. (2024). Attacks against journalists in Brazil: Catalyzing effects and resilience during Jair Bolsonaro’s government. International Journal of Press/Politics, 29(4), 847–868. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612231182618

Panievsky, A., David, Y., Gidron, N., & Sheffer, L. (2025). Imagined journalists: New framework for studying media–audiences relationship in populist times. International Journal of Press/Politics, 30(1), 38–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612241231541

Peifer, J. T., & Myrick, J. G. (2021). Risky satire: Examining how a traditional news outlet’s use of satire can affect audience perceptions and future engagement with the news source. Journalism, 22(7), 1629–1646. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919833259

Ramaprasad, J., Liu, Y., & Garrison, B. (2012). Ethical use of new technologies: Where do Indian journalists stand? Asian Journal of Communication, 22(1), 98–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2011.622776

Ross, T. (2022). Locating oneself and talking past: Journalists’ engagement with Pacific communities on Twitter. Media International Australia, 183(1), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X211061768

Ruhl Ibarra, G., Hermans, L., & Kleemans, M. (2025). Perceptions of imagery in tragic news: A comparative study of news audiences. Journalism Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2025.2466599

Scherer, T., & Stratil, J. (2024). Can’t read my broker face?—Tracing a motif and metaphor of expert knowledge through audiovisual images of the financial crisis. Literature Compass, 21(1–3). https://doi.org/10.1111/lic3.12756

Shaffer, V. A., Scherer, L. D., Focella, E. S., Hinnant, A., Len-Ríos, M. E., & Zikmund-Fisher, B. J. (2018). What is the story with narratives? How using narratives in journalism changes health behavior. Health Communication, 33(9), 1151–1157. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1333562

Walters, P. T. (2025). Pushing for social change: How collaborations are recalibrating the journalistic mission. Journalism Practice, 19(2), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2023.2187862

Weber, M., & Buchanan, R. (2019). Metadata as a machine for feeling in Germaine Greer’s archive. Archives and Manuscripts, 47(2), 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2019.1568266

Wilner, T., Clements-Housser, K., Bélair-Gagnon, V., & Sridharan, N. (2025). Journalists’ views on the research-practice gap. Journalism. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849241310962

Wold, T. (2023). Letters to the public: What goes viral online? SAGE Open, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231155412

Downloads

Published

2025-04-24

How to Cite

Desiana Desiana. (2025). Emojurnalism dalam Ekosistem Media Digital . Jurnal Riset Rumpun Seni, Desain Dan Media, 4(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrsendem.v4i1.4425