Pemetaan Stakeholder dalam Rencana Tata Tanam Global Berbasis Neraca Air Irigasi

Authors

  • Oktaviano Oktaviano Universitas Sriwijaya
  • Efrilia Efrilia Universitas Sriwijaya
  • Ali Sadikin Universitas Sriwijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrit.v5i1.9746

Keywords:

Collaborative Governance, Cropping Plan, Irrigation Governance, Power-Interest Matrix, Stakeholder Mapping, Water Balance

Abstract

Stakeholder mapping is not merely an auxiliary communication activity in irrigation planning; it is a governance instrument that determines whether technical water-balance calculations can be converted into legitimate cropping schedules, coordinated operations, and collective compliance at the field level. This study analyzes the configuration of stakeholders in the implementation of a water-balance-based Global Cropping Plan (RTTG) in Musi Rawas Regency, Indonesia. A descriptive qualitative case-study approach was employed. Data were collected through field observation, in-depth interviews, and focus group discussions involving local government agencies, planning and technical departments, irrigation officers, agricultural extension workers, farmer water-user associations, farmer groups, rice farmers, fish farmers, and community water users. The data were processed through thematic coding, role identification, triangulation, and a power-interest matrix. The findings indicate that RTTG implementation depends on the alignment of four actor clusters: policy steering actors, technical-operational actors, regulatory and resource-support actors, and water users. Promoters with high power and high interest must be engaged intensively as policy legitimators and coordination drivers; latents must be approached through legal, budgetary, and institutional arguments; defenders require participatory empowerment as field implementers and social monitors; and apathetics need concise public information to prevent misinformation. The study concludes that stakeholder mapping strengthens adaptive irrigation governance by integrating technical data, institutional authority, farmer participation, and food-security objectives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543-571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032.

Bryson, J. M. (2004). What to do when stakeholders matter: Stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public Management Review, 6(1), 21-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030410001675722.

D’Agostino, D., Borg, M., Hallett, S. H., Sakrabani, R. S., Thompson, A., Papadimitriou, L., & Knox, J. W. (2020). Multi-stakeholder analysis to improve agricultural water management policy and practice in Malta. Agricultural Water Management, 229, 105920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105920.

FAO. (2021). The state of the world’s land and water resources for food and agriculture: Systems at breaking point. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb7654en.

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.

Garcia-Chevesich, P. A., Valdés-Pineda, R. M., Roy, T., & Valdes, J. (2025). Editorial: Water governance across management scales. Frontiers in Water, 7, 1623330. https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2025.1623330.

Handayani, W., Dewi, S. P., & Septiarani, B. (2023). Toward adaptive water governance: An examination on stakeholders engagement and interactions in Semarang City, Indonesia. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(2), 1914-1943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02124-w.

Houar, K., Fetoui, M., & Bellal, S. A. (2024). Pathways for improving water governance in Western Algeria: A multi-stakeholder analysis. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Administratio Locorum, 23(1), 57-70. https://doi.org/10.31648/aspal.9021.

Kharanagh, S. G., Banihabib, M. E., & Javadi, S. (2020). An MCDM-based social network analysis of water governance to determine actors’ power in water-food-energy nexus. Journal of Hydrology, 581, 124382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124382.

Korekallu Srinivasa, A., & Mithöfer, D. (2024). Unpacking stakeholder perceptions on challenges for increasing adoption of solar-powered irrigation systems in India: A Q methodology study. Q Open, 4(2), qoae020. https://doi.org/10.1093/qopen/qoae020.

Lee, M., Yoon, J.-H., Yang, J. E., Namkoong, S., & Kim, H. (2024). Stakeholder analysis for effective implementation of water management system: Case of groundwater charge in South Korea. Heliyon, 10(3), e24699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24699.

Lim, C. H., Wong, H. L., Elfithri, R., & Teo, F. Y. (2022). A review of stakeholder engagement in integrated river basin management. Water, 14(19), 2973. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14192973.

Lubell, M., & Fulton, A. (2021). The role of social networks in collaborative governance: A case study of California water management. Environmental Management, 67(5), 771-783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01440-4.

Maya-Jariego, I. (2024). Using stakeholder network analysis to enhance the impact of participation in water governance. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 442. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02958-x.

Moreira, F. D., Fonseca, P. R. S., Miranda, R. M., Oliveira da Costa, L., & Mejias Carpio, I. E. (2024). Stakeholder engagement for inclusive water governance in a rural community in Brazil. Frontiers in Water, 6, 1378514. https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2024.1378514.

OECD. (2015). Stakeholder engagement for inclusive water governance. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264231122-en.

Salamanca-Cano, A. K., & Durán-Díaz, P. (2023). Stakeholder engagement around water governance: 30 years of decision-making in the Bogotá River Basin. Urban Science, 7(3), 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci7030081.

Sarami-Foroushani, T., Balali, H., & Movahedi, R. (2024). Assessing the role of stakeholders in sustainable groundwater resources management using power-interest matrix (PIM): In Hamedan-Bahar plain, Iran. Frontiers in Water, 6, 1344856. https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2024.1344856.

UNESCO, & UN-Water. (2024). The United Nations World Water Development Report 2024: Water for prosperity and peace. Paris: UNESCO.

Wehn, U., Collins, K., Anema, K., Basco-Carrera, L., & Lerebours, A. (2018). Stakeholder engagement in water governance as social learning: Lessons from practice. Water International, 43(1), 34-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2018.1403083.

Whitley, H., Engle, E. W., Brasier, K. J., Eaton, W. M., Burbach, M. E., Fowler, L. B., Bonilla Anariba, S., Butzler, E., Dixon, K., Kumar Chaudhary, A., & Whitmer, W. (2025). Stakeholder engagement in water resource management: A systematic review of definitions, practices, and outcomes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 68(11), 2523-2544. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2024.2323611.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Oktaviano Oktaviano, Efrilia Efrilia, & Ali Sadikin. (2026). Pemetaan Stakeholder dalam Rencana Tata Tanam Global Berbasis Neraca Air Irigasi. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Tanaman, 5(1), 387–399. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrit.v5i1.9746