Pengaturan Batasan Nominal Uang Pengganti Kerugian dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana dengan Pendekatan Keadilan Restoratif dalam Perspektif Kepastian Hukum

Authors

  • Edgart Marpaul Boelan Universitas Nusa Cendana
  • Simplexius Asa Universitas Nusa Cendana
  • Orpa Ganefo Manuain Universitas Nusa Cendana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v5i3.8260

Keywords:

Legal Certainty, Nominal Limit, Restitution, Restorative Justice, Victims’ Rights

Abstract

This study examines the urgency of regulating the nominal limit of restitution in criminal case resolution through a restorative justice approach from the perspective of legal certainty. Restorative justice in Indonesia is governed by PERKAP No. 8 of 2021, PERJA No. 15 of 2020, and PERMA No. 1 of 2024. However, none of these regulations explicitly stipulate the nominal limit of compensation payable to victims. The absence of such a provision potentially leads to legal uncertainty and unfair practices, particularly in cases where resolution depends on the offender's ability to pay restitution. This research adopts a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches. The study aims to analyze the necessity of regulating nominal limits and how such limits should be determined under the prevailing legal framework. The findings reveal that the lack of clear restitution limits hampers the effective implementation of restorative justice, undermines fairness, and fails to adequately protect victims' rights. Legal regulation of compensation limits is necessary to ensure legal certainty, prevent abuse of power, and uphold justice in the victim recovery process. The study recommends that the state promptly establish clear restitution limits through revision of existing regulations or formulation of new ones, taking into account the principles of justice, the offender’s financial capacity, and the proportionality of the victim's losses.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Apeldoorn, V. (1990). Pengantar ilmu hukum (2nd ed.). Pradnya Paramita.

Beremanda, L. P. O., Hafrida, & Siregar, E. (2023). Principles of restorative justice in discontinuing prosecutions through compensation and restitution. PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law, 4(2), 277-287. https://doi.org/10.22437/pampas.v4i2.26483

Council, U. N. E. and S. (2002). Basic principles on the use of restorative justice programmes in criminal matters. https://www.un.org/en/ecosoc/docs/2002/resolution%202002-12.pdf

Dicey, A. V. (1893). Introduction to the study of the law of the constitution. Macmillan & Co.

Effendi, E. (2022). Penjatuhan pidana ganti rugi sebagai pidana pokok dalam kejahatan terhadap harta benda. JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW, 5(2), 618-632. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v5i2.5355

Eglash, A. (1977). Beyond restitution: Creative restitution. Lexington Books.

Firdaus, M. B. (2025). Dialektika keadilan, kepastian, kemanfaatan hukum dalam perspektif Gustav Radbruch pada hukum Indonesia. JKHKP, 3(1), 357-367.

Hamzah, A. (2004). Hukum acara pidana Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.

K., F. F. (2023). Kasus Nenek Minah, pembuka fenomena penerapan restorative justice. Hukumonline. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/kasus-nenek-minah--pembuka-fenomena-penerapan-restorative-justice-lt64ad8fa40c796/

Kaban, B., Mulyadi, M., & Mansar, A. (2023). Ganti rugi sebagai upaya perlindungan hak korban kejahatan perspektif politik hukum pidana. JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI, 11(1), 76-92. https://doi.org/10.36987/jiad.v11i1.3698

Manan, B. (2006). Penegakan hukum yang berkeadilan. Varia Peradilan, 241, 28.

Marshall, T. (1999). Restorative justice: An overview. https://restorativejustice.org.uk/sites/default/files/resources/files/Restorative%20Justice%20-%20An%20Overview_0.pdf

Muchtar, H., & Yusman, B. D. (2020). Implementasi restorative justice dalam penyelesaian perkara delinkuensi. Tadulako Master Law Journal, 4(2), 146-158.

Sharpe, S. (1998). A vision for healing and change. Edmonton Victim Offender Mediation Society.

Sugiyono. (2020). Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R & D.

Zehr, H. (1990). Changing lenses: A new focus for crime and justice. Herald Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-04

How to Cite

Edgart Marpaul Boelan, Simplexius Asa, & Orpa Ganefo Manuain. (2026). Pengaturan Batasan Nominal Uang Pengganti Kerugian dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana dengan Pendekatan Keadilan Restoratif dalam Perspektif Kepastian Hukum. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Humaniora, 5(3), 342–353. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v5i3.8260

Similar Articles

<< < 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.