Pendekatan COPRAS dalam Penentuan Lokasi Supermarket
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrimipa.v4i3.7750Keywords:
COPRAS, Decision Support System, Retail Location, Regional Development, Medan AreaAbstract
This research extends the previous work of Tsaqila, Winiarti, and Widaningrum (2024), who applied the Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) method within a decision support system for supermarket branch location selection. Unlike the prior study, which focused on Ponorogo through a web-based framework, this study expands the implementation of COPRAS to the Medan Area, Medan Kota, Medan Polonia, dan Medan Maimun districts, adapting it to local urban, social, and economic characteristics. The main objective is to identify the most strategic site for a new supermarket by analyzing multiple criteria, including land cost, population density, accessibility, safety, cleanliness, and disaster risk. Data were collected from both field surveys and official government publications. The findings reveal that the COPRAS method provides reliable and objective assessments among the evaluated alternatives, with Medan Area emerging as the most suitable location for supermarket development. Overall, this study broadens the practical scope of the COPRAS method in a different regional context and reinforces its reliability and adaptability as a multi-criteria decision-making tool in the modern retail industry.
Downloads
References
Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Medan. (2024). Kecamatan dalam angka 2024: Medan Area, Medan Kota, Medan Maimun, dan Medan Polonia. BPS Kota Medan.
Brown, S. (2016). Retail location: A micro-scale perspective. Routledge.
Dinas Perdagangan Kota Medan. (2024). Laporan tahunan dan data harga lahan komersial Kota Medan 2024. Pemerintah Kota Medan.
Geoportal Kota Medan. (2024). Data peta usaha dan zonasi komersial Kota Medan. Pemerintah Kota Medan.
Guy, C. (2010). Planning for retail development: A critical view of the British experience. Routledge.
Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.). Pearson Education.
Pemerintah Kota Medan. (2023). Rencana tata ruang wilayah Kota Medan 2023–2043. Pemerintah Kota Medan.
Podvezko, V. (2011). The comparative analysis of MCDA methods SAW and COPRAS. Inzinerine Ekonomika–Engineering Economics, 22(2), 134–146. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.22.2.310
Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
Sari, M., & Ramadhan, A. (2023). Analisis faktor penentu lokasi ritel modern di Kota Medan. Jurnal Riset Manajemen dan Bisnis, 11(2), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.33633/jekobs.v2i2.7323
Tsaqila, A., Winiarti, S., & Widaningrum, I. (2024). Penerapan metode COPRAS untuk menentukan lokasi optimal minimarket di wilayah perkotaan. Jurnal Teknologi dan Sistem Informasi, 12(1), 44–52.
Turskis, Z., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2009). COPRAS method application in multi-criteria evaluation of urban infrastructure development. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 4(4), 221–231. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648-4142.2009.24.221-231
Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2010.10
Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A., & Sarka, V. (1994). The new method of multi-criteria complex proportional assessment of projects. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 1(3), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/13928619408534622
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 JURNAL RISET RUMPUN MATEMATIKA DAN ILMU PENGETAHUAN ALAM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
