Alat Penilaian Integritas Organisasi dalam Kerangka Sistem Manajemen Integritas pada Organisasi Sektor Publik

Suatu Tinjauan Alternatif

Authors

  • Nur Irfan Dwi Nugroho Universitas Terbuka
  • Vivi Oktari Universitas Terbuka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrie.v5i1.7631

Keywords:

Integrity, Public Sector, Integrity Assessment Tool (IAT), OECD Integrity Framework, SMAP SNI ISO 37001

Abstract

Integrity is a fundamental value in realizing clean, transparent, and accountable public sector governance. Various integrity assessment instruments have been implemented in the public sector in Indonesia, such as the Integrity Assessment Survey (SPI) by the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), the Integrity Zone (ZI) by the Ministry of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform (PANRB), and IntoSAINT developed by INTOSAI. However, all three still have limitations. This study aims to analyze the strengths and weaknesses of these three instruments and develop an alternative assessment tool, the Integrity Assessment Tool (IAT), which can be an alternative choice to the integrity assessment model in Indonesia. This study uses a qualitative descriptive approach through literature studies and analysis of integrity policy documents, with a theoretical foundation of the OECD Integrity Framework and the Anti-Bribery Management System (SNI ISO 37001). The results show that the Integrity Assessment Tool is able to assess organizational integrity comprehensively and objectively through four main dimensions: history, performance, potential, and perception. This approach integrates quantitative, qualitative, and psychometric aspects to produce a more accurate and sustainable picture of the integrity position of public sector organizations. Theoretically, this research enriches the study of public sector integrity management, while practically, it provides guidance for government agencies in building a measurable, systematic, and sustainable integrity evaluation system as a basis for establishing a national model for integrity assessment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Angky Febriansyah, & Indirwan, I. (2022). Pengaruh Integritas Dan Pengendalian Internal Terhadap Pencegahan Fraud Dalam Pengelolaan Keuangan Negara (Studi Kasus KPP Pratama Bandung Bojonagara). JEMBA: Journal of Economics, Management, Business, and Accounting, 220–230.

Apriwandi, & Christine, D. (2023). Pengaruh Skeptisme Profesional, Integritas Dan Beban Kerja Terhadap Penilaian Risiko Kecurangan. Owner: Riset & Jurnal Akuntansi, 7(4), 3560–3568.

Arimuladi, S. U. (2022). Zona Integritas: Konsep Penegakan Dan Penerapan Asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik Untuk Mewujudkan Good Governance And Clean Government. Setara Press.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional. (n.d.). SNI ISO 37001: Sistem Manajemen Anti Penyuapan Persyaratan Dengan Panduan Penggunaan. BSN.

Fountain, L. (2017). Ethics And The Internal Auditor’s Political Dilemma: Tools And Techniques To Evaluate A Company’s Ethical Culture. CRC Press.

Hanafi, A. S., & Harsono, M. (2020). Pelaksanaan Reformasi Birokrasi Dengan Pembangunan Zona Integritas Pada Kementerian Perindustrian. JIKAP: Jurnal Informasi Dan Komunikasi Perkantoran, 31–37.

INTOSAI, & INTOSAI Development Initiative. (2010). IntoSAINT: Self Assessment Of Integrity By Supreme Audit Institutions – Implementation Handbook. Oslo.

International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions. (2016). ISSAI 130: Code Of Ethics (p. 5). https://www.intosai.org

Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2017). Buku Panduan KPK: Survei Penilaian Integritas. KPK.

Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2024). Laporan Survei Penilaian Integritas Tahun 2024. KPK.

Netherlands Court of Audit. (2013). Manual IntoSAINT: Integrity Self-Assessment For Supreme Audit Institutions.

OECD. (2009). Principles For Integrity In Public Procurement. OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2009). Towards A Sound Integrity Framework: Instruments, Processes, Structures And Conditions For Implementation. OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2018). Behavioral Insights For Public Integrity: Harnessing The Human Factor To Counter Corruption. OECD Public Governance Reviews. OECD Publishing.

Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara Dan Reformasi Birokrasi (Permenpan RB) Nomor 90 Tahun 2021 Tentang Pembangunan Dan Evaluasi Zona Integritas Menuju Wilayah Bebas Dari Korupsi (WBK) Dan Wilayah Birokrasi Bersih Dan Melayani (WBBM).

Susanto, Y. (2020). Integritas Auditor: Pengaruhnya Dengan Kualitas Hasil Audit. Deepublish.

Susilo, W. D., Angraeni, S., & Partohap, T. H. (2019). Survei Penilaian Integritas: Alternatif Pengukuran Kinerja Pemberantasan Korupsi. Jurnal Integritas – KPK, 165–189.

Suyono. (2022). Kajian Literatur: Konsep Integritas Bagi ASN. Cendekia: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan, 247–260.

Zulfa, L., & Muniroh, S. M. (2025). Pengembangan Model Asesmen Formatif Untuk Meningkatkan Integritas Akademik Dan Kejujuran Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Morfologi: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa, Sastra Dan Budaya, 311–319.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Nur Irfan Dwi Nugroho, & Vivi Oktari. (2026). Alat Penilaian Integritas Organisasi dalam Kerangka Sistem Manajemen Integritas pada Organisasi Sektor Publik: Suatu Tinjauan Alternatif. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Ekonomi, 5(1), 614–630. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrie.v5i1.7631

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.