Waktu Skor Pemulihan Bromage 2 dengan Metode Enhanced Recovery After Caesarean Surgery (ERACS) dan Non ERACS di Rumah Sakit Emanuel
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/innovation.v4i3.9610Keywords:
Bromage Score, Cesarean Section, ERACS, Motor Recovery, Non-ERACSAbstract
Cesarean section (CS) is an obstetric surgical procedure whose incidence continues to rise, making it necessary to optimize postoperative recovery to support early mobilization and prevent complications. Most CS procedures are performed under spinal anesthesia, making motor recovery an important indicator assessed using the Bromage score. The ERACS method was developed to accelerate recovery through a multimodal approach. Data from Emanuel Hospital show that out of 223 CS cases, 70 cases used ERACS and 153 cases were non-ERACS; however, data on the time to achieve a Bromage score of 2 for both methods are not yet available. This study aims to determine the profile of the time to achieve a Bromage score of 2 in post-SC patients using the ERACS and non-ERACS methods. This study employed a quantitative descriptive design with a cross-sectional approach involving 55 respondents selected via consecutive sampling. Data were collected through observation until patients reached a Bromage score of 2 and were analyzed using univariate analysis. The results showed that the mean time to achieve a Bromage score of 2 in the ERACS group was 39.00 minutes (15–75 minutes), and in the non-ERACS group, it was 67.50 minutes (30–90 minutes). Respondents were aged 19–43 years, with the majority having an ASA II physical status (96.4%), and the most commonly used anesthetics were bupivacaine (56.4%) and lidocaine-morphine as an adjuvant (43.6%). In conclusion, the ERACS method showed a trend toward faster motor recovery, thereby potentially supporting early mobilization and the development of perioperative care protocols. These findings reinforce the importance of implementing ERACS in anesthetic practice to support early mobilization, serve as a basis for the development of hospital protocols, and open opportunities for further research with analytical designs to strengthen the scientific evidence.
Downloads
References
Aliyafih, M., Sintara, S., Merisdawati, M., Jamil, M., & Rodli, M. (2023). Hubungan Status Fisik American Society of Anesthesiologist Terhadap Waktu Pencapaian Bromage Score 2 Di Ruang Pemulihan Pada Pasien Sectio Caesarea Dengan Spinal Anestesi. Jurnal Kesehatan Hesti Wira Sakti, 11(2), 252–257. https://doi.org/10.47794/jkhws.v11i2.579
Arlena, N., Novitasari, D., & Burhan, A. (2024). Differences in the Time to Achieve Bromage Score (2) in Post-Spinal Anesthesia Caesarean Section Patients between the Use of Conventional Methods and Eracs. Indonesian Journal of Global Health Research, 2(4), 389–398. https://doi.org/10.37287/ijghr.v2i4.250
Artika, R. C., Riyadi, R. S., & Dewi, R. K. (2025). Correlation of ASA Physical Status With The Achievement of Bromage Score In Post Subarachnoid Block Anesthesia Patients. Journal Keperawatan, 4(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.58774/jourkep.v4i1.77
Barliana, P. C., Zulfariansyah, A., & Sitanggang, R. H. (2023). Perbandingan Morfin Dosis 0,05 Mg dengan 0,1 Mg Sebagai Adjuvan Bupivakain 0,5% 10 Mg Intratekal Terhadap Skala Nyeri dan Durasi Analgesia Pascaseksio Sesarea. Jurnal Anestesi Perioperatif, 11(2), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.15851/jap.v11n2.3395
Handoyo, D., Santoso, T. B., & Almas, A. (2024). Efektivitas Latihan ROM Pasif Ekstremitas Bawah terhadap Percepatan Bromage Score pada Pasien Post Spinal Anestesi. Detector: Jurnal Inovasi Riset Ilmu Kesehatan, 2(2), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.55606/detector.v3i1.4766
Handoyo, D., & Sarifah, S. (2021). Edukasi dan Penerapan Bromage Score dalam Penilaian Mobilitas Pasien Pasca Spinal Anestesi di Rumah Sakit Education and Application of Bromage Score in Post-Spinal Anesthesia Patient Mobility Assessment in Hospitals ITS PKU Muhammadiyah , Indonesia Mobili. 3(4). https://doi.org/10.57214/pengabmas.v6i4.755
Hanifah, A., Rostianingsih, D., & Siantar, R. L. (2023). Kemampuan Mobilisasi Dini Pada Ibu Post Sectio Caesarea (SC) Dengan Metode Eracs Di RSIJ Pondok Kopi Jakarta Timur Tahun 2023. Jurnal Bidang Ilmu Kesehatan, 13(4), 338–351. https://doi.org/10.52643/jbik.v13i4.3196
Hendrix, J. M., & Garmon, E. (2025). American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System.
Kementerian Kesehatan RI. (2021). Laporan situasi kesehatan ibu dan anak / data intervensi (termasuk kecenderungan persalinan caesar di Jawa Tengah). Jakarta: Kemenkes RI.
Kementrian kesehatan RI. (2024). Pelatihan Penatalaksanaan Keperawatan Perioperatif Bagi Perawat Kamar Bedah Di Rsud Simpang Lima Gumul Kediri.
Kumala, R., Apsari, F., Uyun, Y., & Suryasaputra, W. (2019). Tinjauan Pustaka Anestesi pada Pembedahan Non-Obstetri dalam Kehamilan. 7(November), 67–78.
Manurung, N., Suandika, M., & Burhan, A. (2020). Perbedaan Lama Rawat Inap Antara Metode Spinal Anastesi dan Metode Eracs. British Medical Journal, 2(5474), 1333–1336.
Molly, M, K., Merianti, L., Amelia, R., & Fitri, Y. (2023). Lama Hari Rawat Pasien Operasi Sectio Caesarea Metode Eracs dan Konvensional. Jurnal Keperawatan Medika, 2(1), 1–6.
Mubarokah, P. P., & Handayani, L. (2025). Enhanced Recovery After Caesarean Section (ERACS ): 6, 17858–17867.
Nurhayati, I., & Nadjib, M. (2023). Enhanced Recovery After Caesarean Delivery: A Narrative Review. 16, 99–104. https://doi.org/10.33086/jhs.v16.i01.3098
Prayanangga, K., & Nilasari, D. (2022). Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean Surgery (ERACS): Analisis Berbasis Bukti. JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia), 14(3), 274–287. https://doi.org/10.14710/jai.v0i0.50022
Rusmawati, A., Wijiastutik, T., Wijaya, W. A., & Fawzi, A. (2024). Tes Perbedaan Waktu untuk Mencapai Skor Bromage 0 Pasca- Operasi Caesar Menggunakan Metode Eracs dan Non Eracs Perempuan Terlantar di Simpang Lima Gumul ( SLG ) Rumah Sakit Kediri Machine. 8(1), 84–93.
Sudarsih, I., Agustin, & Ardiansyah. (2023). Hubungan Antara Komplikasi Kehamilan dan Riwayat Persalinan Terhadap Tindakan Sectio Caesarea. Jurnal Penelitian Perawat Profesional, 5(4), 1567–1576.
Supraptomo, R. (2021). Manajemen Anestesi untuk Seksio Sesarea pada Pasien Pre Eklampsia Berat yang Terinfeksi Covid-19. Jurnal Anestesi Obstetri Indonesia, 4(1), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.47507/obstetri.v4i1.59
Tanpomas, I., Valentia, C., Suparto, S., & Wijaya, M. A. (2025). Comparison of Motoric Block Duration between 0.5% Hyperbaric Bupivacaine and 0.5% Levobupivacaine Cesarean Section. Jurnal Kedokteran Meditek, 31(6), 349–356. https://doi.org/10.36452/jkdoktmeditek.v31i6.4022
Theofika, E., & Pujiyanto, P. (2023). Pengaruh Metode Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean Sectio (Eracs) Terhadap Tingkat Kemandirian Pasca Sectio Cesarea. Jurnal …, 4, 5195–5202.
Widjaja, Y. R., Adhirajasa, U., & Sanjaya, R. (2025). Analisis Efektivitas Biaya Dan Lamarawat Pada Ibu Melahirkan Melalui Operasi Sesar : Perbandingan Metode ERACS Dan Non-. 4(5), 2749–2757. https://doi.org/10.56799/jceki.v4i5.11439
World Health Organization. (2021a). Caesarean section rates continue to rise, amid growing inequalities in access.
World Health Organization. (2021b). Global patient safety action plan 2021–2030:Towards eliminating avoidable harm e health care. In World Health Organization.
Wulandari, F. C., & Fatmasari, N. (2023). Hubungan Usia Ibu Bersalin Dengan Persalinan Sectio Caesarea Di Rs Panti Waluyo Purworejo. Jurnal Komunikasi Kesehatan, 14(1), 12–18.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sulistyawati Geraldine Rambu Diki Ridja, Roro Lintang Suryani, Madyo Maryoto, Aris Rahmat

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








