Akibat Hukum Terhadap Surat Kuasa Membebankan Hak Tanggungan Pasca Keputusan Pailit
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v5i4.9210Keywords:
Bankruptcy, Legal Analysis, Mortgage Authorization, Mortgage Rights, Unlawful ActAbstract
This study analyzes the legal validity of the Power of Attorney to impose Mortgage Rights executed after a bankruptcy decision.The research is based on a case study of the Commercial Court Decision of Semarang Number 11/Pdt.Sus-GLL/2023 in conjuction with previous related rulings. The background of this particularly when creditors attempt to secure their interest through unilateral legal actions after a bankriptcy declaration. This study aims to examine the legal consequences of post-bankruptcy Power of Attorney to impose Mortgage Rights execution and evaluate its compliance with Indonesian bankruptcy law and civil law priciples. The research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and case aaproaches. The findings indicate that the execution of Power of Attorney to impose Mortgage Rights and the subsequent establishment of mortgage rights after a bankruptcy decision are legally invalid. This is due to the debtor losing authority over their assets upon the declaration of bankruptcy, as regulated under Law Number 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations. Besides that the action also violates the subjective conditions of the agreement in Article 1320 of the Civil Code and is an act against the law. The implication of this research emphasizes the importance of protecting the pari passu pro rata parte principle to ensure fairnessfor all creditos in the bankruptcy process.
Downloads
References
Sutan Remy Sjahdeini, “Legal Position of Secured Creditors in Indonesian Bankruptcy Law,” Indonesia Law Review11, no. 2 (2021), https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v11n2.683.
J. Djohansah, "Pengadilan Niaga", di dalam Rudy Lontoh (ed), 2001, Penyelesaian Utang Melalui Pailit atau Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, Alumni, Bandung.
Fred B.G. Tumbuan, "Pokok-Pokok Undang-Undang Tentaug Kepailitan sebagaimana diubah oleh PERPU No. 1/1998", dalam Rudy Lontoh (ed), 2001, Penyelesaian Utang Melalui Pailit atau Pemndaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, Alumni, Bandung.
Kartini Mdjadi, "Pengertian dan Prinsip-prinsip Umum Hukum Kepailitan", dalam Rudy Lontoh (ed), 2001, Penyelesaian Utang Melalui Pailit atau Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, Alumni, Bandung.
David G. Epstein, Steve H. Nickles and James J. White, 1993, Bankruptcy, West Publishin? Co, USA.
Robertus Bilitea, 2003, "Beberapa Catatan BPPN Tentang Putusan-Putusan Pengadilan Niaga", Jurnal Huffurn Bisnis, Volume 22 No. 24 Tahun 2003.
Simanjuntak, PNH. (2007). Pokok Pokok Hukum Perdata Indonesia. Cet. 3. Jakarta : Djambatan.).
Nating, Imran. (2005). Peranan dan Tanggung Jawab Kurator Dalam Pengurusan dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit. ED. Revisi. Cet. 2. Jakarta : RajaGrafindo Persada.
Agus Wiyono, “Keududukan Hukum Akta Pemberian Hak Tanggungan Yang Terlambat didaftarkan, Jurtama I no.1 (2019).
Ana Silviana, Fungsi Surat Kuasa Memasang Hak Tanggungan (Skmht) Dalam Pemberian Hak Tanggungan (Studi Perspektif UU No.4 Tahun 1996 Tentang Hak Tanggungan Beserta Benda-Benda Yang Berkaitan Dengan Tanah), Diponegoro Private Law Review 7, no. 1 (2020): 676, http://lib.ui.ac.id/abstrakpdf.jspdetail?id=20199970.
Moses Nathanael and Benny Djaja, “Akibat Hukum Dari Perjanjian Yang Dibuat Dengan Tanggal Mundur ( Back Date ),” Unes Law Review 6, no. 1 (2023): 2869–82, https://learnquantum.com/EDU/index.html%0Ahttp://publications.lib.chalmers.se/ records/fulltext/245180/245180.pdf%0Ahttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12380/245180%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2011.03.003%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2017.08.001%0Aht.
Anthony, P., Markoni, Widarto, J., & Helvis. (2024). PEMENUHAN SYARAT DUA KREDITOR SEBAGAI DASAR PERMOHONAN PAILIT DI PENGADILAN NIAGA MELALUI CESSIE ATAS SEBAGIAN JUMLAH PIUTANG. 2(01).
Moh Harir et al., “Konflik Norma (Antinomy Normen) Sita Umum Dengan Sita Pidana Dalam Pemberesan Harta Pailit,” Jurnal USM Law Review8, no. 2 (2025): 1107–25, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v8i2.11384.
Tivana Arbiani Candini and Reisar Alka, “Insolvensi Tes Sebagai Dasar Permohonan Pailit Dalam Hukum Kepailitan Di Indonesia,” Gloria Justitia2, no. 2 (2022): 181–93, https://doi.org/10.25170/gloriajustitia.v2i2.3900.
Mulyatno, A. D. Kewenangan Kurator Untuk Mengurus Perseroan Terbatas Pailit. Asas Wa Tandhim: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan Dan Sosial Keagamaan (2022), 1(2). https://doi.org/10.47200/awtjhpsa.v1i2.1280
Ni Made Seri Wahyuni Dewi, I Nyoman Putu Budiartha, Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti, “Perjanjian Kredit Bank dalam hal surat kuasa membebankan hak tanggungan tidak diikuti dengan akta pemberian hak tanggungan, Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum vol 3 No.1 (2022).
Sri Y Wahyuni, Nurfaidah Said, and Marwah, “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pihak Debitur Dan Kreditur Baru Pada Proses Take Over Atas Roye HT-El Yang Dilakukan Oleh Kreditur Lama,” UNES Law Review 5, no. 4 (2023): 4397 4410,
Joko Subagyo, “Metode Penelitian Dalam Teori Dan Praktek,” (Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2004), https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1441&context=notary
Sri Mamudji dan Hang Rahardjo. “Metode Penelitian dan Penulisan Hukum.” (Jakarta: Badan Penerbit FH UI, 2005), https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1441&context=notary
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Troy Iversen Jayakusuma, Indra Yuliawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
