Peran Siklus Hidup dan Bio Akuntansi Terhadap Produksi Ayam Broiler yang Berkelanjutan dengan Kecerdasan Lingkungan sebagai Variabel Moderasi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrie.v4i2.7481Keywords:
Bio-Accounting; Life Cycle; Livestock Sustainability; Sustainable Broiler Production; smart EnvironmentalAbstract
This study aims to examine the role of life cycle and bio-accounting in achieving sustainable broiler chicken production and to analyze whether environmental intelligence moderates these relationships. The life cycle approach is viewed as a comprehensive method for assessing resource efficiency, waste management, and environmental impacts throughout each stage of broiler production. Bio-accounting serves as a tool to measure and record biological aspects affecting livestock performance, feed consumption, emissions, and production efficiency. A quantitative method was employed through surveys distributed to small- and medium-scale broiler farmers. The results indicate that both life cycle and bio-accounting have a positive and significant effect on sustainable broiler production. Moreover, smart environmental strengthens these effects, as farmers with higher levels of environmental intelligence are better able to utilize bio-accounting information and life cycle assessments to manage resources efficiently and reduce environmental impacts. These findings highlight the importance of integrating life cycle analysis, bio-accounting practices, and environmental intelligence to enhance the sustainability of broiler production.
Downloads
References
Alfonso-Avila, A. R., Cirot, O., Lambert, W., & Létourneau-Montminy, M. P. (2022). Effect of low-protein corn and soybean meal-based diets on nitrogen utilization, litter quality, and water consumption in broiler chicken production: insight from meta-analysis. Animal, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2022.100458
Aureli, S., Foschi, E., & Paletta, A. (2023). Management accounting for a circular economy: current limits and avenue for a dialogic approach. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2022-5766
Farfan-Lievano, A., Ceballos, O. I., & Mejia Soto, E. (2024). Bioaccounting measurement of environmental assets: beyond environmental accounting. Meditari Accountancy Research, 32(6), 2001–2033. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-09-2022-1796
Guðjónsdóttir, S. B., Vásquez-Mejía, C. M., Shrivastava, S., & Ögmundarson, Ó. (2025). A life cycle assessment of broiler chicken meat and egg production in Iceland. Poultry Science, 104(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2025.105072
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
Ippolito, N. M., Amato, A., Ferella, F., Prisciandaro, M., Beolchini, F., Vegliò, F., & Innocenzi, V. (2024). The application of the life cycle assessment and life cycle costing for the treatment of microelectronic industry effluents. Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering, 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2024.100854
Iqbal Chaudhry, N., Asad, H., Amir Ch, M., & Imitiaz Hussian, R. (2020). Environmental Innovation and Financial Performance: Mediating Role of Environmental Management Accounting and Firm’s Environmental Strategy. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 4(3), 715–737.
Kadawo, A., Sadagopan, M., During, O., Bolton, K., & Nagy, A. (2023). Combination of LCA and circularity index for assessment of environmental impact of recycled aggregate concrete. Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials, 12(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650373.2021.2004562
Kazancoglu, I., Sagnak, M., Kumar Mangla, S., & Kazancoglu, Y. (2021). Circular economy and the policy: A framework for improving the corporate environmental management in supply chains. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 590–608. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2641
Khonitan, D., Ariyadi, B., & Dono, N. D. (2025). The Difference in Lighting Duration on Broiler Chicken Production and Carcass Quality. Proceeding of The 5th International Conference on Environmentally Sustainable Animal Industry (ICESAI2024), 124–141. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-670-3_14
Ošlovnik, T., & Denac, M. (2025). Agricultural and Food Product Assessment—Methodological Choices in Sustainability Reporting Using the LCA Method. Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17156837
Präger, L., Woytowicz, J., Reitberger, R., & Lang, W. (2025). LCA-based calculation of GHG Protocol Scope 3: A bottom-up approach to determine GHG emissions of the construction activity of municipalities. Building and Environment, 285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113502
Sugiharto, W. H., Susanto, H., & Prasetijo, A. B. (2024a). Evaluating Polynomial, and Gaussian Approaches for Temperature Change Sub Index of Water Quality Index for Smart Environmental Management. Mathematical Modelling of Engineering Problems, 11(9), 2425–2436. https://doi.org/10.18280/mmep.110915
Sugiharto, W. H., Susanto, H., & Prasetijo, A. B. (2024b). Selecting IoT-Enabled Water Quality Index Parameters for Smart Environmental Management. Instrumentation Mesure Metrologie, 23(4), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.18280/i2m.230401
Symeon, G. K., Akamati, K., Dotas, V., Karatosidi, D., Bizelis, I., & Laliotis, G. P. (2025). Manure Management as a Potential Mitigation Tool to Eliminate Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Livestock Systems. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 17, Issue 2). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17020586
Wehner, D., Prenzel, T., Betten, T., Briem, A. K., Hong, S. H., & Ilg, R. (2022). The Sustainability Data Science Life Cycle for automating multi-purpose LCA workflows for the analysis of large product portfolios. E3S Web of Conferences, 349. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202234911003
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Ekonomi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
