The Role of Kinesthetic Movements in Jolly Phonics Instruction: Supporting Letter Sound Awareness among Toddlers

Ni Putu Dian Agnessia; Ni Made Diana Erfiani; Yohanes Octovianus Lesu Awololon

doi:10.55606/jurribah.v5i2.9476

Authors

Ni Putu Dian Agnessia Universitas Dhyana Pura
Ni Made Diana Erfiani Universitas Dhyana Pura
Yohanes Octovianus Lesu Awololon Universitas Dhyana Pura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jurribah.v5i2.9476

Keywords:

Jolly Phonics, Kinesthetic Movements, Letter-Sound Awareness, Multisensory Learning, Toddlers.

Abstract

This study investigated the role of kinesthetic movements in supporting letter-sound awareness among toddlers aged 2 years at a child care center in Canggu, Bali. A qualitative descriptive design was employed to examine how movement-based phonics instruction facilitated early literacy development. Data were collected through classroom observations, field notes, and a Likert-scale observation checklist during eight instructional sessions involving 15 children. The analysis focused on four indicators: imitating the kinesthetic gesture, producing the letter sound, responding to a heard letter sound, and identifying the corresponding letter. The study was guided by the principles of structured teacher support and multimodal learning, which emphasize integrating verbal and physical experiences in early learning. Data were analyzed using an interactive qualitative approach involving data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings revealed a gradual improvement in children’s recognition of the five-target letter sounds across the instructional sessions. Letter sounds accompanied by more distinctive movements were acquired more quickly than those accompanied by less noticeable movements. The results suggested that kinesthetic movements effectively supported letter-sound awareness and contributed to early literacy development among toddlers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anthony, J. L., & Francis, D. J. (2005). Development of phonological awareness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5), 255–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00376.x

Ayuningtyas, T., Iswara, P. D., Sopandi, W., & Sujana, A. (2025). The Effect of the Phonics Method Using Beginning Reading Media on Primary School Students’ Beginning Reading Skills. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 12(1), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.53400/mimbar-sd.v12i1.81908

Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01320076

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2015). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publication. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8116-3.ch010

Ehri, L. (2020). The Science of Learning to Read Words: A Case for Systematic Phonics Instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(3).

Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Indriani, I. S., Christianti, M., & Hayati, N. (2025). Application of Phonics Method for Early Literacy Development of Preschool Children. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 15(1), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v15i1.pp119-138

Juan Rubio, A. D. (2025). Rise of Phonological Awareness in Spanish Early Childhood Education Students. Brno Studies in English, 50(2), 85–105. https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2024-2-4

Lloyd, S. (1998). The Phonics Handbook (3rd ed.). Jolly Learning Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003619185

Lonigan, C. J., & Shanahan, T. (2008). Developing Early Literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel. National Center Family Literacy, 2(1). National Institude for Literacy.

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publication. https://www.metodos.work/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Qualitative-Data-Analysis.pdf

Nafgerin, G. G., & Bakar, K. A. (2023). The use of the Jolly Phonics method in improving English reading and writing skills among preschool students. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(12), 3726–3738. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i12/20219

Ngura, E. T., Fono, Y. M., & Wea, H. R. (2025). Optimizing Children's Early Literacy Through Contextual Implementation of The Phonics Method in Rural Early Childhood Institutions. EDUKASIA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 6(2), 819–830. https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v6i2.1504

Paivio, A. (1990). Mental Representations: A dual coding approach. Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach, 1–322. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195066661.001.0001

Piasta, S. B., & Wagner, R. K. (2010). Learning letter names and sounds: Effects of instruction, letter type, and phonological processing skill. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105(4), 324–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2009.12.008

Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing Reading Difficulties in Young Children. National Academy Press.

Solichah, N., & Fardana, N. A. (2024). Exploring multisensory programs as early literacy interventions: a scoping review. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 13(5), 3411–3418. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i5.28991

Storch, S. A., & Whitehurst, G. J. (2002). Oral Language and Code-Related Precursors to Reading: Evidence from a Longitudinal Structural Model. Development Psychology, 38(6), 934–947.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Mental Processes. Harvard University Press. https://w.pauldowling.me/rtf/2021.1/readings/LSVygotsky_1978_MindinSocietyDevelopmentofHigherPsycholo.pdf