Analysis Pragmatic Competence in Student Interviews With Foreign Tourists in Seminyak, Bali

Authors

  • Ni Luh Desy Suari Dewi universitas dhyana pura
  • I Gede Neil Prajamukti Wardhana Universitas Dhyana Pura
  • Yohanes Octovianus L. Awololon Universitas Dhyana Pura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jurribah.v4i1.5875

Keywords:

EFL Learners, Cooperative Principle, Grice’s Maxims, Pragmatics

Abstract

In Indonesia and many other EFL contexts, English is often taught in structured classroom settings that rely on scripted dialogues and controlled practice. This limits students’ exposure to spontaneous, real-life communication, reducing their ability to use English naturally and appropriately in authentic situations. This study investigates the pragmatic competence of Indonesian students during English interview interactions with foreign tourists, using Grice’s Cooperative Principle as the theoretical framework. Five video recordings were analyzed, featuring elementary and secondary students conducting unscripted interviews with tourists at Seminyak Beach, Bali. While the students generally demonstrated adequate grammatical control and vocabulary range, the findings reveal recurring challenges in sustaining natural and cooperative conversations. The most frequent violations involved the Maxims of Relation, Quantity, and Manner, with students often failing to respond appropriately to tourist answers, providing minimal elaboration, or speaking in unclear and disorganized ways. The results highlight the need for English language teaching to include explicit instruction in pragmatic skills, such as turn-taking, topic development, and interactional awareness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afendi, F. A., & Setiawan, D. (2021). A pragmatic analysis of speech acts in English for tourism conversations. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Linguistik dan Sastra, 1(1), 67–74. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/prosidingsemantiks/article/view/38998

Al-Zubeiry, H. Y. (2019). EFL students’ pragmatic failure in understanding implicatures in English. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 10(1), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol10no1.14

Bardovi‐Harlig, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Do language learners recognize pragmatic violations? Pragmatic versus grammatical awareness in instructed L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly, 32(2), 233–259.

Crystal, D. (2008). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (6th ed.). Blackwell.

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 41–58). Academic Press.

Herawati, A. (2013). The cooperative principle: Is Grice's theory suitable to Indonesian language culture? Lingua Cultura, 7(1), 43–48.

Hossain, M. I. (2021). Application of Grice’s maxims in students’ conversations: A pragmatic analysis. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 3(3), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.32996/jeltal.2021.3.3.4

Kasper, G. (1997). Can pragmatic competence be taught? NetWork #6. University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center. https://www.hawaii.edu/sls/uhwpesl/6/Kasper.pdf

Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman.

Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics: An introduction (2nd ed.). Blackwell.

Nunn, R. (2011). Intercultural communication and Grice’s cooperative principle: Language learning beyond the classroom. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 13(4), 7–20. https://www.asian-efl-journal.com

Paltridge, B. (2012). Discourse analysis: An introduction (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.

Putri, A. Y., & Widiati, U. (2020). Developing pragmatic awareness through classroom interaction: A case study of Indonesian EFL learners. TEFLIN Journal, 31(1), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v31i1.34-50

Retnowaty. (2017). Pragmatic competence of Indonesian EFL learners. Journal of English Language and Education, 3(2). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325249995_Pragmatic_competence_of_Indonesian_EFL_learners

Skelin, M. M. (2017). Misunderstandings in communication: Maxims of conversation and intercultural differences between interlocutors. Prague Journal of English Studies, 6(1), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjes-2017-0007

Taguchi, N. (2011). Pragmatic competence in Japanese as a second language: An introduction. Japanese Language and Literature, 45(2), 239–246. https://doi.org/10.2307/41459884

Taguchi, N. (2011). Teaching pragmatics: Trends and issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000018

Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in interaction: An introduction to pragmatics. Longman.

Wahyuni, S. (2013). Pragmatic competence in English as a foreign language: A study of Indonesian learners. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v3i2.277

Downloads

Published

2025-07-12

How to Cite

Ni Luh Desy Suari Dewi, I Gede Neil Prajamukti Wardhana, & Yohanes Octovianus L. Awololon. (2025). Analysis Pragmatic Competence in Student Interviews With Foreign Tourists in Seminyak, Bali. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Bahasa, 4(1), 747–754. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurribah.v4i1.5875