Types of Slang Terms Found in The Movie Dope
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jurribah.v4i1.5072Keywords:
Movie, Slang, SociolingusticAbstract
This study investigates the types of slang terms found in the movie Dope by classifying them based on their linguistic characteristics and communicative functions. Using Green’s (2002) Slang Theory, the research identifies and categorizes slang into five types: innovative, group-identifying, evasive, reactive, and playful slang. A qualitative descriptive method was applied, with data collected through documentation and analyzed by examining how each slang type is formed and used in context. The findings reveal that innovative slang was the most frequently used, illustrating the dynamic and creative nature of youth language. By focusing on linguistic structure and function rather than cultural context, this study provides insights into how slang operates as a form of informal communication within media. The analysis demonstrates that slang in Dope serves various linguistic purposes such as expressing identity, humor, secrecy, and emotional response, contributing to a broader understanding of informal language use in modern youth discourse.
Downloads
References
Adams, M. (2009). Slang: The people's poetry. Oxford University Press.
Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden words: Taboo and the censoring of language. Cambridge University Press.
Ayto, J. (1998). The Oxford dictionary of slang. Oxford University Press.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Bucholtz, M. (2001). The whiteness of nerds: Superstandard English and racial marksmanship in the construction of identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5(2), 278–305.
Bucholtz, M. (2009). Style and sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge University Press.
Coleman, J. (2012). The life of slang. Oxford University Press.
Connell, K. (2022). Multicultural Britain. Hurst Publishers.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Crystal, D. (2003). The Cambridge encyclopedia of the English language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Eble, C. (1996). Slang and sociability: In-group language among college students. University of North Carolina Press.
Green, J. (2002). African American English: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Hasanah, U., Widodo, W., & Sulistyaningrum, D. (2018). The role of supporting characters in shaping the narrative: A study of the interaction dynamics in film. Journal of Cultural Studies, 3(1), 45–58.
Joseph, S. (2024). The use of slang as a linguistic resource in the creation of an Anglo-Indian identity: The case of Hyderabad Anglo-Indians. International Journal of Anglo-Indian Studies. https://www.international-journal-of-anglo-indian-studies.org/index.php/IJAIS/article/view/308/248
Kramsch, C. (1998). Language and culture. Oxford University Press.
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Rickford, J. R. (1999). African American Vernacular English: Features, evolution, educational implications. Blackwell Publishers.
Rickford, J. R., & Rickford, R. J. (2000). Spoken soul: The story of Black English. Wiley.
Sapir, E. (1921). Language: An introduction to the study of speech. Harcourt, Brace & Company.
Smith, J. (2020). Linguistic identity in African American cinema: Slang, AAVE, and cultural expression. Routledge.
Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan aneka teknik analisis bahasa: Pengantar penelitian wahana kebudayaan secara linguistis. Sanata Dharma University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Bahasa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
